e.g. ‘owing to the lack of extramural funding, other important factors such as and extra funding for travel costs to scientific meetings were not provided’
CMOCs indicated in bold highlight the three cross‐cutting themes of time, identity and relationships.
ECRs = early‐career researchers.
As Table Table1 1 shows, the same intervention can lead to positive or negative outcomes depending on the particular contexts and mechanisms triggered. This highlights greater complexity than is evident at first glance. Cross‐cutting these four interventions were three mechanisms that were regularly identified as critical to the success (or not) of a research environment: time; researcher identities, and relationships. We now present key findings for each of these cross‐cutting mechanisms and discuss how their inter‐relations lead to our modified programme theory (Fig. (Fig.3). 3 ). Note that although we have tried to separate these three mechanisms for ease of reading, they were often messily entangled. Table Table2 2 presents quotes illustrating the way in which each mechanism mediates outcomes within particular circumstances.
Modified programme theory. ECR = early‐career researcher
Time, identity and relationships as cross‐cutting mechanisms mediating successful research environments
Quote no. | Mechanism | Quote |
---|---|---|
1 | Time: efficient use of time | ‘I never say I need more time because you could use that as an excuse for anything… But I think support in terms of being quite smart at aligning research activity to other activity you're involved in is quite important’ |
2 | Identity: internal motivation | ‘[For teacher researchers] inherent satisfaction and reward from research, rather than external praise and feedback, was certainly an indication of moving towards a research identity’ |
3 | Relationships: leadership | ‘From an institutional perspective, much depends on the perceived value of research and how it is actively supported by management, for example, in terms of study leave, time allocated for research and the impact of financial savings’ |
4 | Time and identity | ‘I say personal determination and resilience is a big factor because there are people who have been given some time and have then not delivered… I mean some of them are keen, they will say they have got no time and you know that is an interesting question about whether you make time or whether you have to wait for time to be given to you’ |
5 | Identity and leadership | ‘…research leadership as a “process through which academic values and identities are constructed, promoted and maintained”. Leadership is, therefore, central to establishing a healthy and vibrant research culture’ |
6 | Time and relationships | ‘We recognise that the sense of community developed over time would not have been possible without mutual trust and respect. This has been instrumental in creating a safe environment for both academic and personal development, and has in turn made it “possible to share problems without feeling uncomfortable”. Without a sense of trust it would also have been impossible for us to become more confident both in ourselves, as emerging academics, and in our work’ |
Time was identified as an important mechanism for mobilising research outcomes across our three disciplines. Time was conceptualised severally including as: protected time; workload pressures influencing time available; efficient use of time; flexible use of time; making time, and time in career. The two most commonly considered aspects were protected time and workload implications. Protected time was largely talked about in the negative across a variety of contexts and disciplines, with lack of protected time leading to lack of researcher engagement or inactivity and reduced research productivity. 32 , 35 , 37 , 41 , 44 , 47 , 49 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 67 Also across a variety of contexts and disciplines, and acting as a positive mechanism, available protected time was found to lead to increased research productivity and active research engagement. 31 , 36 , 40 , 48 , 49 , 63 , 65 With regard to workload, limitations on the time available for research imposed by excessive other workloads led to reduced research activity, lower research productivity, poor‐quality research and reduced opportunity to attend research training. 40 , 41 , 47 , 49 , 60 , 67 Juggling of multiple responsibilities, such as clinical, teaching, administrative and leadership roles, also inhibited research productivity by diminishing the time available for research. 35 , 40 , 49 The alignment of research with other non‐research work was described as driving efficiencies in the use of time leading to greater research productivity (Table (Table2, 2 , quote 1).
Identity was also an important mechanism for mobilising research outcomes across our three disciplines. Interpretations included personal identities (e.g. gender), professional identity (e.g. as a primary practitioner or a primary researcher), and social identity (e.g. sense of belongingness). Researcher identity was often referred to in relation to first‐career practitioners (and therefore second‐career researchers). Sharp et al. 48 defined these as participants recruited into higher education not directly from doctoral study but on the basis of their extensive ‘first‐order’ knowledge and pedagogical expertise. These were also practitioners conducting research in schools or hospitals. Identities were also referenced in relation to early, mid‐career or senior researchers. Academic staff working in academic institutions needed to develop a sense of researcher identity, belongingness, self‐efficacy for research and autonomy to increase their satisfaction, competence and research activity. 39 , 40 , 44 , 46 , 51 , 67 For first‐career practitioners (i.e. teachers, doctors), the research needed to be highly relevant and aligned to their primary identity work in order to motivate them. 53 , 59 , 62 , 65 This alignment was described as having a strong research–teaching nexus. 40 , 48 Linked to this concept was the need for first‐career practitioners to see the impact of research in relation to their primary work (e.g. patient‐ or student‐oriented) to facilitate motivation and to develop a researcher identity (Table (Table2, 2 , quote 2). 36 , 37 , 41 , 49 , 53 , 54 , 67 Where research was seen as irrelevant to primary identity work (e.g. English language teaching, general practice), there was research disengagement. 37 , 48 , 52 , 59 , 67
For all researchers and across our three disciplines, relationships were important in the mediating of successful research environments. 31 , 34 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 44 , 57 , 60 , 66 , 67 Positive research relationships were characterised by mutual trust and respect, 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 54 , 66 , 72 whereas others described them as friendships that take time to develop. 51 Mutually supportive relationships seemed to be particularly relevant to ECRs in terms of developing confidence, self‐esteem and research capacity and making identity transitions. 35 , 43 , 48 , 58 , 67 Relationships in the form of networks were considered to improve the quality of research through multicentre research and improved collaboration. 33 , 60 Supportive leadership as a particular form of relationship was an important mechanism in promoting a successful research environment. Supportive leaders needed to monitor workloads, set the vision, raise awareness of the value of research, and provide positive role‐modelling, thereby leading to increased productivity, promoting researcher identities and creating thriving research environments (Table (Table2, 2 , quote 3). 31 , 34 , 37 , 38 , 40 , 41 , 43 , 44 , 46 , 48 , 49 , 53 , 55 , 62 Research leadership, however, could be influenced negatively by the context of compliance and counting in current university cultures damaging relationships, creating a loss of motivation, and raising feelings of devalue. Indeed, the failure of leaders to recognise researcher identities led to negative research productivity. 36 , 37 , 38 , 43 , 46 , 48 , 49
Time and identity.
Time and identity intersected in interesting ways. Firstly, time was a necessary enabler for the development of a researcher identity. 37 , 38 , 41 , 48 , 49 , 54 , 59 , 61 , 63 , 65 , 67 , 69 Secondly, those who identified as researchers (thus holding primary researcher identities) used their time efficiently to favour research activity outcomes despite a lack of protected time. 35 , 43 Conversely, for other professors who lacked personal determination and resilience for research, having protected time did not lead to better research activity. 43 This highlights the fact that time alone is insufficient to support a successful research environment, and that it is how time is utilised and prioritised by researchers that really matters (Table (Table2, 2 , quote 4).
Interventions aimed at developing researcher identity consistently focused on relationship building across the three disciplines. The interventions that supported identity transitions into research included formal research training, 44 , 48 , 52 , 68 mentoring, 41 , 48 , 57 , 65 , 72 writing groups, 72 and collaboration with peers and other researchers, 39 , 41 , 43 operating through multiple mechanisms including relationships. The mechanisms included self‐esteem/confidence, increased networks, external recognition as a researcher, belongingness, and self‐efficacy. 35 , 41 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 52 , 57 Furthermore, our data suggest that leadership can be an enabler to the development of a researcher identity. In particular, leadership enabled research autonomy, recognition and empowerment, and fostered supportive mentoring environments, leading to researcher identity development and research productivity (Table (Table2, 2 , quote 5). 34 , 38 , 46 , 48
Relationships were developed and sustained over time (Table (Table2, 2 , quote 6). Across the three disciplines, the role of leaders (managers, directors, deans) was to acknowledge and raise awareness of research, and then to prioritise time for research against competing demands, leading to effective research networks, cohesion and collaboration. 31 , 34 , 38 , 43 , 46 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 53 , 55 , 70 Second‐career PhD students who did not invest time in establishing relationships with researchers in their new disciplines (as they already had strong supportive networks in their original disciplines) found that they had limited research networks following graduation. 48
Our initial programme theory was based on previous literature reviews 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 and on the REF2014 criteria. 10 , 21 However, we were able to develop a modified programme theory on the basis of our realist synthesis, which highlights novel findings in terms of what really matters for successful research environments. Firstly, we found that key interventions led to both positive (subjective and objective) and negative (subjective and objective) outcomes in various contexts. Interestingly, we did not identify any outcomes relating to research impact despite impact nowadays being considered a prominent marker of research success, alongside quantitative metrics such as number of publications, grant income and h‐indices. 21 Secondly, we found that disciplinary contexts appeared to be less influential than individual, local and institutional contexts. Finally, our modified programme theory demonstrates a complex interplay among three cross‐cutting mechanisms (time, researcher identity and relationships) as mechanisms underpinning both successful and unsuccessful research environments.
Our research supports the findings of earlier reviews 1 , 5 , 6 , 7 regarding the importance of having a clear research strategy, an organisation that values research, research‐oriented leadership, access to resources (such as people, funding, research facilities and time), and meaningful relationships. However, our research extends these findings considerably by flagging up the indication that a clear linear relationship, whereby the presence of these interventions will necessarily result in a successful research environment, does not exist. For example, instituting a research strategy can have negative effects if the indicators are seen as overly narrow in focus or output‐oriented. 38 , 40 , 46 , 47 , 64 Similarly, project money can lead to the employment of more part‐time staff on fixed‐term contracts, which results in instability, turnover and lack of research team expertise. 40 , 67 , 71
Our findings indicate that the interplays among time, identity and relationships are important considerations when implementing interventions promoting research environments. Although time was identified as an important mechanism affecting research outcomes within the majority of papers, researcher identity positively affected research outcomes even in time‐poor situations. Indeed, we found that identity acted as a mechanism for research productivity that could overcome limited time through individuals efficiently finding time to prioritise research through their motivation and resilience. 35 , 43 Time was therefore more than just time spent doing research, but also included investment in developing a researcher identity and relationships with other researchers over time. 37 , 38 , 41 , 48 , 49 , 54 , 59 , 61 , 63 , 67 , 69 Relationship‐building interventions were also found to be effective in supporting difficult identity transitions into research faced by ECRs and those with first‐career practitioner backgrounds. Supportive leadership, as a particular form of relationship, could be seen as an enabler to the provision of protected time and a reasonable workload, allowing time for research and for researcher identity formation. 34 , 38 , 46 , 48 Indeed, our realist synthesis findings highlight the central importance of researcher identity and thus offer a novel explanation for why research environments may not flourish even in the presence of a research strategy, resources (e.g. time) and valuing of research.
Researcher identity is complex and intersects with other identities such as those of practitioner, teacher, leader and so on. Brew et al. 39 , 73 , 74 explored researcher identification and productivity by asking researchers if they considered themselves to be ‘research‐active’ and part of a research team. Those who identified as researchers prioritised their work differently: those who were highly productive prioritised research, whereas those in the low‐productivity group prioritised teaching. 73 Interestingly, highly productive researchers tended to view research as a social phenomenon with publications, presentations and grants being ‘traded’ in academic networks. Brew et al. 39 explain that: ‘…the trading view relates to a self‐generating researcher identity. Researcher identity develops in the act of publication, networks, collaborations and peer review. These activities support a person's identification as a researcher. They also, in turn, influence performance measures and metrics.’ Although the relationships among identity, identification and productivity are clearly complex, we explored a broader range of metrics in our realist synthesis than just productivity.
This is the first study to explore this important topic using realist synthesis to better understand the influence of context and how particular interventions lead to outcomes. We followed RAMESES 20 guidelines and adopted a rigorous team‐based approach to each analytic stage, conducting regular quality checks. The search was not exhaustive as we could have ‘exploded’ the interventions and performed a comprehensive review of each in its own right (e.g. mentoring). However, for pragmatic reasons and to answer our broad research questions, we chose not to do this, as suggested by Wong et al. 20 Although all members of the team had been involved in realist syntheses previously, the process remained messy as we dealt with complex phenomena. The messiness often lies in untangling CMOCs and identifying recurrent patterns in the large amounts of literature reviewed.
Our findings suggest that interventions related to research strategy, people, IIF and collaboration are supported under the ‘right’ conditions. We need to focus on time, identity and relationships (including leadership) in order to better mobilise the interventions to promote successful research environments.
Individuals need to reflect on how and why they identify as researchers, including their conceptions of research and their working towards the development of a researcher identity such that research is internally motivated rather than just externally driven. Those who are second‐career researchers or those with significant teaching or practitioner roles could seek to align research with their practice while they establish wider research networks.
We recommend that research leaders support individuals to develop their researcher identity, be seen to value research, recognise that research takes time, and provide access to opportunities promoting research capacity building, strong relationships and collaboration. Leaders, for example, may introduce interventions that promote researcher identities and build research relationships (e.g. collaborations, networking, mentoring, research groups etc.), paying attention to the ways in which competitive or collaborative cultures are fostered. Browne et al. 75 recently recommended discussions around four categories for promoting identity transition: reflection on self (values, experiences and expectations); consideration of the situation (circumstances, concerns); support (what is available and what is needed), and strategies (personal strategies to cope with change and thrive). With the professionalisation of medical education, 76 research units are increasingly likely to contain a mixture of first‐ and second‐career researchers, and our review suggests that discussions about conceptions of research and researcher identity would be valuable.
Finally, organisations need to value research and provide access to resources and research capacity‐building activities. Within the managerialist cultures of HEIs, compliance and counting have already become dominant discourses in terms of promotion and success. Policymakers should therefore consider ways in which HEIs recognise, incentivise and reward research in all its forms (including subjective and objective measures of quantity, quality and impact) to determine the full effects of their policies on research environments.
Future research would benefit from further exploration of the interplay among time, identities and relationships (including leadership) in different contexts using realist evaluation. 77 Specifically, as part of realist approaches, longitudinal audio‐diaries 78 could be employed to explore researcher identity transitions over time, particularly for first‐career practitioners transitioning into second‐career researchers.
RA and CER were responsible for the conception of the synthesis. All authors contributed to the protocol development. RA and PESC carried out the database searches. All authors sifted for relevance and rigour, analysed the papers and contributed to the writing of the article. All authors approved the final manuscript for publication.
Ethical approval.
not required.
Table S1. Definitions of key terms.
Table S6. Contexts, interventions, mechanisms and outcomes identified in individual studies.
we thank Andy Jackson, Learning and Teaching Librarian, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK, for his advice and help in developing our literature searches. We also thank Laura McDonald, Paul McLean and Eilidh Dear, who were medical students at the University of Dundee, for their help with database searches and with sifting papers for relevance and rigour. We would also like to thank Chau Khuong, Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, for her work in designing Figs Figs1 1 and and3 3 .
Understanding ecosystems for a sustainable future, search form.
Visitors: The SERC campus is open Monday-Saturday, 8:00am-5:30pm. We're closed Sundays and federal holidays. Please do a health self-check before arriving, and stay home if feeling sick. Read Plan Your Visit for information on where to park, updated maps and hours, safety, and more.
Our trails are closed due to downed debris from a recent storm. For your safety, please do not hike the trails until further notice. We appreciate your patience while we work to clear the debris.
In the event of a government shutdown, SERC will remain OPEN for our normal Monday - Saturday hours through at least Saturday, October 7, by using prior year funds. Visit si.edu for updates.
The Reed Education Center is back open! Parking is available in the paved lot in front of the building. Please watch your step as you walk around the building - Remnant construction debris may be present.
Read Plan Your Visit for information on where to park, updated maps, safety, and more. Find out when to visit the Woodlawn History Center .
Photo by Mary Best
Photo by Emily Li
Photo by Emily Li
Get Involved Menu
Internship opportunities
SERC is seeking interns to join us for summer 2024! Interns at SERC conduct independent projects over 10 -16 weeks on a wide range of topics including some of the most profound issues challenging our world today, including habitat loss, climate change, and invasive species. Choose from a variety of opportunities including research labs, environmental education, Participatory Science, and science communications. Our intern alumni have used our professional-training programs as a stepping-stone to pursue a wide range of STEM careers.
Although students will become familiar with much of the research of SERC in general, individuals will devote most of their time to an independent research project. Students will have the opportunity to expand their knowledge in a selected field of study and to learn a variety of research techniques through firsthand experience. At the conclusion of the internship, student participants will be expected to present the findings of their independent projects in a formal seminar to the SERC community.
Please submit your application by February 15, 2024, using the SOLAA web portal .
The serc internship experience.
The Smithsonian Environmental Research Center's (SERC) Internship Program offers undergraduate and beginning graduate students a unique opportunity to gain hands-on experience in the fields of environmental research and public engagement. This program enables students to work on independent research projects under the direction of a SERC mentor.
Since 2001 the SERC internship program has been a National Science Foundation REU (Research Experience for Undergraduates) site. With this funding, along with generous donations from sources like the Smithsonian Women's Committee and university partnerships, we are able to provide internship opportunities to qualified students looking to further their knowledge in the natural sciences.
Internship projects span the range of research conducted at SERC, including environmental chemistry, marine and estuarine ecology, molecular ecology, and terrestrial ecology. Projects are also offered in public engagement, with opportunities in environmental education, Participatory Science, and science writing. Although students will become familiar with much of the research of SERC in general, individuals will devote most of their time to an independent research project. Students will have the opportunity to expand their knowledge in a selected field of study and to learn a variety of research techniques through firsthand experience. At the conclusion of the internship, student participants will be expected to present the findings of their independent projects in a formal seminar to the SERC community. As an additional educational benefit, SERC maintains an ongoing seminar program that is designed to bring in noted outside speakers on a variety of topics in the environmental sciences. When conditions permit, we also offer experiential field trips to the Smithsonian museums and galleries on the National Mall.
The SERC community recognizes the value of diversity in promoting innovative science and creative solutions, and we strongly encourage candidates from all backgrounds to apply. Internships are designed as training and skill-building opportunities for students and recent grads still in the early stages of their careers. We recognize that each applicant will bring unique skills, knowledge, experiences and background to these positions, including experience that may not be directly related to science or research.
Pro tip for applicants: Don't just talk about your past experience. Show us how a SERC internship would give you something new! Smithsonian internships are meant to be learning experiences, especially for students who have had fewer opportunities outside schoolwork. Let your application reviewers know how this experience would benefit you beyond another line on a resume. See more tips for applying on our Internships FAQ page .
Tuition & fees.
Additional program details, tuition and financial aid, start your antioch journey, phd in environmental studies, find solutions to crucial environmental challenges.
Our doctoral program is founded on the conviction that theory and practice go hand-in-hand and that our most essential research questions arise from integrating professional experiences and scholarship. Approach your research with a multidisciplinary perspective, integrating science, policy, humanities, education, and service to pursue sustainable solutions to pressing local, national, and international environmental challenges. Our innovative low residency model allows you to pursue your PhD without putting your life on hold.
This degree is offered by AU New England in a low residency format.
The doctoral program in Environmental Studies is a 66-credit program that can be completed in 4-5 years. It utilizes a cohort-based low residency model to provide a rich learning experience accessible to working professionals.
In this program, you’ll engage in coursework and seminars with a diverse and supportive group of students and faculty whose experience and wide-ranging interests will augment your own. Specialize in the research area for which you have a passion and apply the theories and methods best suited to your research interests. Study with faculty who bridge disciplinary and methodological boundaries, who model the integration of scholarship and practice, who emphasize the role of service, and who are recognized locally, nationally, and internationally.
Environmental Studies integrates a wide range of concepts and ideas and embraces multiple methodological approaches to understanding and solving critical and emerging environmental challenges. The current areas of research interest and expertise among ES PhD students and faculty overlap significantly and intentionally and indicate the richness of content, dialog, scholarship, and practice in our program. The following illustrates the research areas of our students and faculty:
Phd program director, core faculty.
Environmental Studies & Sustainability
Speak to the Program Director
Our learning community encourages free and open inquiry, a sustained and challenging discourse, the consideration of diverse and multiple perspectives, issues of mutual interest, an awareness of the learning process, and room for self-reflection. Each entering class travels through the four phases of the program together as a cohort group, developing a deep interest in each others’ work, establishing lifelong bonds of friendship and collegiality, and developing measures of support and critique that are invaluable learning tools.
The program uses a hybrid delivery model. Students undertake their coursework through a combination of 1 on-campus residency per semester for the first three phases, along with synchronous and asynchronous online engagement. This hybrid approach allows students to participate in the program without having to uproot themselves and put their careers on hold.
Mentoring and advising are crucial aspects of our learning community. The faculty cultivates strong mentoring relationships. During the first year of the program, students are encouraged to work closely with all of the faculty. Through coursework, they learn about each faculty member’s research interests and teaching approaches. Throughout all four phases of the program, students and faculty work very closely together in small classes, becoming intimately familiar with their common interests and ideas.
Upon entering the program, students are placed with an academic advisor who helps guide them through the initial phases of the program. During the second year, students typically chose a faculty member to serve as their dissertation chair. The chair is deeply interested in the student’s work, providing support and encouragement, helping the student develop substantive expertise, as well as exploring issues of voice and expression. Through various consultations, the student and chair become a learning team, thinking through scholarly choices and directions.
Students who pursue AUNE’s PhD in Environmental Studies are united by the desire to research and move forward crucial environmental issues. They have diverse academic, professional, and personal experiences that add value to the comprehensive curriculum. Our students’ and graduates’ backgrounds include:
Take a look at our current students and the work they are doing
Explore examples of student dissertations
Environmental studies info session | aune, a talk on environmental justice by mia montoya hammersley, an environmental justice conversation with jacqui patterson, environmental justice: agency and environmental joy with gerald torres, degree requirements.
Students have a maximum limit of ten years from the date of entry to complete all degree requirements, including the dissertation, and 66 semester-hour credits beyond a Master’s. The program is organized into four phases: Foundation Courses, Research Strategies and Learning Domains, Candidacy, and Dissertation. Each phase is described below. Students must complete the Qualifying Exam and successfully defend their Dissertation Proposal before admission to the Dissertation Phase. A listing of specific courses and course descriptions can be found in the Academic Catalogue .
The initial phase of AUNE’s doctoral program in environmental studies instills the foundations of interdisciplinary environmental studies and scholarship through intensive, integrative, theoretically oriented courses. Topics include research design, ecological thought, applied ecological analysis, global environmental change, political economy and sustainability, and environmental history.
On Campus Residencies
The program’s second phase includes a series of seminars about scientific research where students focus on methodologies, literature, and theoretical frameworks to guide their research interests. They discuss their work with leading scholars and writers and learn how others frame and execute their research. Students also design and complete four individual “learning domain” courses, each with an individual mentor, that allow them to focus and deepen their knowledge and research skills in their specific area of future dissertation research.
During the candidacy phase (or the dissertation phase), students complete a service learning project related to their academic goals. In this phase, students also write and submit their qualifying exam in the form of an integrated essay about their area of research interests. Finally, students prepare and defend their dissertation proposals. The timing and sequence of the candidacy phase will vary for each student, depending on her or his own pace.
On Campus Residency
During the fourth and final phase of the program, students participate in seminars designed to support all aspects of the dissertation process. They design and conduct original research and analyses that have direct social, environmental, political, and educational impacts. Finally, they write and defend their doctoral dissertation. This phase of the program can be completed entirely online with no required residencies on campus.
Faculty spotlights.
Core faculty.
Centers, & institutes, & student groups.
The Department’s many centers, institutes, and student groups offer students diverse and compelling opportunities to further their scholarship and practice while contributing to tangible positive change.
Center for climate preparedness & community resilience, institute for international conservation (iic), conservation psychology institute, the herbarium, keene community garden connections, monadnock ecological research & education project, wild treasures: sustainably, naturally, student alliance.
How to Apply
Antioch University New England processes applications for most programs on a rolling basis, so we encourage you to apply as early as possible. All application materials should be received in Admissions by the dates listed below. If you have any questions, please get in touch with the Admissions Department.
Program | Term | Deadline |
---|---|---|
PhD Environmental Studies | Summer | February 1 |
Fall | June 15 |
Official transcripts should be emailed to [email protected] or mailed to the Office of Admissions Antioch University New England 40 Avon Street Keene, New Hampshire 03431-3516. All application materials submitted become part of an applicant’s file and cannot be returned.
As a graduate school providing doctoral-level education, Antioch University New England assesses each applicant’s academic experience and promise, personal and interpersonal competence, and professional experience and promise. Our aim is to attract a talented, committed student body marked by professional, ethnic, and cultural diversity. All doctoral students must maintain a full-time course load. Waiving required courses will be approved only in exceptional situations. Transfer coursework from another accredited doctoral program will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
Requirements
The Doctoral Program in Environmental Studies requires an application portfolio, which must be received by the application deadline. The application portfolio includes seven documents:
Doctoral education is an investment in your future. Let us help you understand the costs and explore the resources available to help make your college education even more affordable. The majority of AUNE students finance their education through some form of financial aid. You may not be sure which federal, state, public, and private aid packages – such as loans, scholarships, and grants – are right for you. Our staff is here to help you so you can focus on what’s most important: beginning your academic program at AUNE.
Tuition & Fees Financial Aid
Department/Program Name | Tuition Cost per Credit | Total Program Credits |
---|---|---|
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES | ||
Degrees: | ||
Resource Management and Administration, MS Leadership & Management of Sustainable Systems | $1,168 | 30 |
Resource Management and Administration, MS *concentrations in International Sustainable Development & Climate Change, or Sustainable Development and Climate Change | $1,168 | 36-38 (with Professional Science Management designation) |
Environmental Studies, MS *consult academic catalog for concentrations available within the degree | $1,168 | 36 |
Environmental Studies, PhD | $1,564 | 66 |
Take your next step – talk to our admissions team to find the right program for you.
A 'safe and just space' transformation. Science informed artwork created by Superflux for Earth Commission/Global Commons Alliance
Research published in The Lancet Planetary Health shows that the planet will only remain able to provide a basic standard of living for everyone in the future if economic systems and technologies are dramatically transformed and critical resources more fairly used, managed and shared.
The report, co-authored by over 60 leading natural and social scientists from the Earth Commission, including academic experts from the University of Exeter, builds on research into ‘Safe and Just Earth System Boundaries’ published last year in Nature , which found that most of the vital limits within which people and the planet can thrive have been surpassed.
The new report identifies the “Safe and Just Space” – within which harm to humans and nature can be minimised while everyone can be provided for – and sets out the paths to reach and stay within this space.
It finds that although it remains possible for all humans to escape poverty and be safe from the harm caused by Earth system change, the planet’s ability to provide and protect is being stretched past its limits.
The scientists warn that future projections to 2050 show that the Safe and Just Space will shrink over time, driven by inequality, unless urgent transformations take place.
For climate specifically they found that if significant changes aren’t made now, by 2050 there will be no Safe and Just Space left.
This means that even if everyone on the planet only had access to the resources necessary for a basic standard of living in 2050, the Earth will still be outside the climate boundary.
Inequalities and overconsumption of finite resources by a minority were found to be key drivers of this shrinking.
The report states that providing minimum resources for those who don’t currently have enough would add much less pressure on the Earth system than that currently caused by the minority who use far greater resources.
It warns that Earth systems face the risk of crossing dangerous tipping points which would cause further significant harm to people around the world – unless energy, food and urban systems are urgently transformed.
The scientists say the only way to provide for everyone and ensure societies, businesses and economies thrive without destabilising the planet is to reduce inequalities in how critical Earth system resources, such as freshwater and nutrients, are accessed and used – alongside economic and technological transformation.
Cities and businesses can play a crucial role in this and become the stewards of our critical Earth systems, and the report provides a guide to how they can reduce their impact on the planet.
The Earth System Boundaries published last year can be seen as the “ceiling” for human extraction of natural resources and pollution, within which the Earth systems can remain stable and resilient, and people can be safe from harm.
Now, scientists have added a “foundation” by showing us what the global population needs from the Earth system to live a life free from poverty.
This is the first time scientists have quantified safety (a stable planet) and justice (people being protected from harm) in the same units – demonstrating that justice is a prerequisite for the safety of the planet and people. The paper builds on fundamental ideas of Earth System Justice, published in Nature Sustainability and Environmental Politics .
The research also looks at where on the planet the Safe and Just boundaries have been breached, and overlayed this with people living in poverty who are exposed to harm from climate change, biodiversity loss, pollution and water shortages.
The findings show that already vulnerable communities are often the most affected by Earth system change that impacts the health of people and ecosystems – but everyone, including the wealthy, is at risk.
Joyeeta Gupta, former co-chair of the Earth Commission, and Professor of Environment and Development in the Global South at the University of Amsterdam, said: “We’re beginning to realise the damage that inequality is doing to the Earth. Increasing pollution and poor management of natural resources is causing significant harm to people and nature. The longer we continue to widen the gap between those who have too much and those who don’t have enough, the more extreme the consequences for all, as the support systems which underpin our way of life, our markets and our economies begin to collapse.”
Johan Rockström, co-chair of the Earth Commission, Director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and Professor in Earth System Science at the University of Potsdam, said: “For the first time, scientists have quantified safety and justice using the same units in order to determine the path forward to a stable and resilient future in which we can all thrive. This paper shows that justice is a prerequisite for the safety of the planet and people. It looks at the risk for further decline of the Earth system, the harm communities are experiencing as a result, but also seeks to identify how resources need to be fairly distributed. Communities, poor and rich, across the world are already vulnerable and will become more exposed – but we have a window to act now and change course.”
University of Exeter co-authors of the report include Professor Tim Lenton, Dr Jesse Abrams and Dr David Armstrong McKay from the Global Systems Institute, and Professor Gail Whiteman from the University of Exeter Business School.
Dr Jesse Abrams said: “Our research demonstrates that justice isn’t just a moral imperative – it’s essential for the planet’s stability. We must urgently address inequality – we’ve found that providing basic resources for those in need would put far less pressure on Earth’s systems than the overconsumption by a minority. This will require formative changes to our economies and technologies to better share and manage the resources and the life support system that we all depend on. The Safe and Just Space is shrinking. However, our findings also offer hope – with concerted action from governments, businesses, and communities, we can create a world that provides for everyone.”
The Safe and Just Space is the only remaining space rich in opportunities – in which people and the planet will remain able to thrive. To reach this space, the paper calls for change in three areas:
Businesses and cities in particular have a leading role to play in reducing the pressure on the planet. By operationalising the Earth system boundaries and using them as a basis for science based targets, they can become better stewards of Earth’s natural resources.
Xuemei Bai, member of the Earth Commission, Distinguished Professor at Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, said: “Companies and cities have a huge potential to make a difference, especially if they work towards the same goal – ensuring the planet can provide for everyone long-term. They are more nimble and flexible than states, and can reduce their pressure on the planet by setting science-based targets in line with our findings.”
Jump to content
Pro tem research assistant/associate/postdoctoral pool (environmental studies) - open pool.
Apply now Job no: 534503 Work type: Faculty - Pro Tempore Location: Eugene, OR Categories: Research/Scientific/Grants, Environmental Studies
Department: CAS Environmental Studies Rank: Research Assistant (Type B) Annual Basis: 12 Month
Applications will be reviewed as needs arise
Please apply online with a resume/CV. Applications will be accepted on a continuous basis. Screening of applications will occur as positions become available and continue until positions are filled.
With 26 core faculty, more than 100 participating faculty from 30 campus departments and programs, more than 600 undergraduate majors, and a strong cohort of masters and doctoral graduate students, the Environmental Studies Program sets the standard in interdisciplinary dialogue and collaboration. Our teaching and research spans across the humanities, social sciences, natural sciences, design fields, and education. Research and graduate education in the Department of Geography focuses on the following subfields: (a) Geographic information science: cartography, GIS, data analysis and visualization, spatial analysis and modeling; (b) Human geography: political-ethnic, cultural, human-environment relations, and behavioral geography; (c) Physical geography: Quaternary studies, biogeography, climatology and climatic change, geomorphology; (d) Environmental studies: forest and ecosystem issues, river and watershed issues, biodiversity and global environmental change, policy and law, environmental applications of GIS; and (e) Geographic education
The Department of Environmental Studies is seeking applicants for its open research assistant, research associate, and postdoctoral scholar pool. Positions are limited-duration appointments potentially renewable. Research Assistant positions will conduct research under the direction of the Principal investigator (PI). Research Associate positions will be conducting research with only general guidance from the PI. Postdoctoral Scholar positions conduct research under the mentorship of a faculty member for the purpose of acquiring additional research experience. All positions receive supervision from the Department Head or Principal Investigator. The University of Oregon and the Department of Environmental Studies are committed to creating a more inclusive and diverse institution and seek candidates with demonstrated potential to contribute positively to its diverse community.
Minimum qualifications by rank: • Research Assistant (Type B): Bachelor's degree in environmental studies or related field. • Senior Research Assistant I (Type B): Bachelor's degree in environmental studies or related field plus 6 years of applicable work experience post degree. • Senior Research Assistant II (Type B): Bachelor's degree in environmental studies or related field plus 12 years of applicable work experience post degree. • Research Assistant (Type C): Master's degree in environmental studies or related field. • Senior Research Assistant I (Type C): Master's degree in environmental studies or related field plus 6 years of applicable work experience post degree. • Senior Research Assistant II (Type C): Master's degree in environmental studies or related field plus 12 years of applicable work experience post degree. • Postdoctoral Scholar: Doctoral degree in environmental studies or related field. • Research Associate: Terminal degree in environmental studies or related field. • Senior Research Associate I: Terminal degree in environmental studies or related field plus 6 years of applicable work experience post degree. • Senior Research Associate II: Terminal degree in environmental studies or related field plus 12 years of applicable work experience post degree.
• Research background in environmental studies or a related field. • Ability to contribute positively to our diverse community. • Ability to work independently and as part of a team.
All offers of employment are contingent upon successful completion of a background check.
The University of Oregon is proud to offer a robust benefits package to eligible employees, including health insurance, retirement plans, and paid time off. For more information about benefits, visit https://hr.uoregon.edu/about-benefits .
The University of Oregon is an equal opportunity, affirmative action institution committed to cultural diversity and compliance with the ADA. The University encourages all qualified individuals to apply and does not discriminate on the basis of any protected status, including veteran and disability status. The University is committed to providing reasonable accommodations to applicants and employees with disabilities. To request an accommodation in connection with the application process, please contact us at [email protected] or 541-346-5112.
UO prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, pregnancy (including pregnancy-related conditions), age, physical or mental disability, genetic information (including family medical history), ancestry, familial status, citizenship, service in the uniformed services (as defined in federal and state law), veteran status, expunged juvenile record, and/or the use of leave protected by state or federal law in all programs, activities and employment practices as required by Title IX, other applicable laws, and policies. Retaliation is prohibited by UO policy. Questions may be referred to the Office of Investigations and Civil Rights Compliance. Contact information, related policies, and complaint procedures are listed here .
In compliance with federal law, the University of Oregon prepares an annual report on campus security and fire safety programs and services. The Annual Campus Security and Fire Safety Report is available online at https://clery.uoregon.edu/annual-campus-security-and-fire-safety-report .
Advertised: September 10, 2024 Pacific Daylight Time Applications close: September 10, 2025 Pacific Daylight Time
Back to search results Apply now Refer a friend
We will email you new jobs that match this search.
Great, we can send you jobs like this, if this is your first time signing up, please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.
The email address was invalid, please check for errors.
You must agree to the privacy statement
Position | Location | Closes |
---|---|---|
Eugene, OR | ||
The Department of Environmental Studies at the University of Oregon invites applications for potential research assistants, research associates and postdoctoral scholar positions. |
Powered by PageUp
Site navigation.
COMMENTS
Environmental science is the multidisciplinary study of all aspects of the Earth's physical and biological environments. It encompasses environmental chemistry, soil science, ecology ...
F inding and choosing a strong research topic is the critical first step when it comes to crafting a high-quality dissertation, thesis or research project. Here, we'll explore a variety research ideas and topic thought-starters related to various environmental science disciplines, including ecology, oceanography, hydrology, geology, soil science, environmental chemistry, environmental ...
environmental studies. Environmental studies articles from across Nature Portfolio. ... Research Open Access 10 Sept 2024 Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. Volume: 11, P: 1171.
Environmental Research is a multi-disciplinary journal publishing high quality and novel information about anthropogenic issues of global relevance and applicability in a wide range of environmental disciplines, and demonstrating …. View full aims & scope. $3590. Article publishing charge. for open access.
But research shows this approach can boost greenhouse-gas emissions and threaten the health of local communities. ... Environmental scientist Anya Sherman studies how microplastics can be taken up ...
Overview. The Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences offers a venue where relevant interdisciplinary research, practice and public policies can be recognized and evaluated. Increasingly, environmental studies integrate many different scientific and professional disciplines.
Environmental studies (EVS or EVST) is a multidisciplinary academic field which systematically studies human interaction with the environment.Environmental studies connects principles from the physical sciences, commerce/economics, the humanities, [1] and social sciences [2] to address complex contemporary environmental issues. It is a broad field of study that includes the natural environment ...
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability publishes new, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research on environmental sustainability. This includes focus on a broad range of topics from; the science of complex, self-organizing and adaptive systems to the sustainable management of natural resource systems (for example agriculture ...
June 26, 2024. By Roxana Shafiee and Dan Schrag. Electrification through heat pumps is a primary strategy for decarbonizing residential heating in Massachusetts. The state has announced ambitions for 65% of residential-scale heating to be heat pump equipment by 2030 and 90% by 2040, earmarking nearly 4 billion dollars in incentives between 2022 ...
Environmental Studies refers to an interdisciplinary field that encompasses research and education on environmental issues, drawing from natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities to address environmental challenges and promote sustainability. AI generated definition based on: International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 2009.
Qualitative research methods examine a wide range of topics in the study of environment and resource management. This first review on the topic highlights innovative and impactful research over the past few decades, drawing from social science disciplines that include sociology, geography, anthropology, political science, public policy, and psychology. We describe qualitative research methods ...
Addresses environmental concerns and research with coverage from more than 300 environmental studies journals and book reference content. Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints Supports science, current events, and language arts and presents all sides of important issues, empowering learners to develop information literacy and critical-thinking ...
The undergraduate program in Environmental Science and Studies introduces students to the Earth's living and nonliving systems and how humans interact with and affect those systems. ... Students can take advantage of opportunities such as research, internships, and study abroad to enrich their education and set them up for success after ...
Yang et al. reviewed the research on interactions between climate change and agriculture's environmental impacts and found that most of this work suggests even greater challenges to come. —Bianca Lopez ... 45 Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955 ...
The methodological needs of environmental studies are unique in the breadth of research questions that can be posed, calling for a textbook that covers a broad swath of approaches to conducting research with potentially many different kinds of evidence. Written specifically for social science-based research into the environment, this book ...
Research. The faculty and students of the Environmental Studies Department engage in research, scholarship, and creative work aimed at understanding and governing the complex relationships between society and the environment. Our work integrates concepts and methods from a variety of fields in the biophysical sciences, the social sciences, and ...
The International Journal of Environmental Studies is an international, peer-reviewed journal which publishes original research. All manuscript submissions are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees.
Hydro power equipment can block migratory fish like salmon from being able to reproduce, causing fisheries to suffer. Even solar power can block sunlight from reaching plants. Developing a truly green future means identifying these potential threats and figuring out how to reduce or eliminate them. 4. Urban Ecology.
Environmental Education (EE) is a transdisciplinary conservation strategy that facilitates place-based and nature-centric learning to develop future environmentalists, scientists, decision-makers, and active community members (Ardoin et al., 2013, 2020).Many studies have shown that environmental education can improve participants' science knowledge, environmental awareness, and environmental ...
Here, the authors study impact craters on the Moon with ages up to 800 million years ago and present a cross correlation to Earth, linking up to mass extinction events throughout Earth's history ...
Therefore, research topics, including environmental science topics, are those about which there are ample questions yet to be definitively answered. Taking time to develop a thoughtful research question will provide the necessary focus and structure to facilitate meaningful research. 10 Great Environmental Science Research Topics (With ...
Abstract. Environment study deals with the processes in water, air, land, soil, and organisms which cause pollution or degradation of the environment. It is an interdisciplinary approach and its ...
Introduction. Research environments matter. Environmental considerations such as robust cultures of research quality and support for researchers are thought to be the most influential predictors of research productivity.1, 2 Over 25 years ago, Bland and Ruffin1 identified 12 characteristics of research‐favourable environments in the international academic medicine literature spanning the ...
The Smithsonian Environmental Research Center's (SERC) Internship Program offers undergraduate and beginning graduate students a unique opportunity to gain hands-on experience in the fields of environmental research and public engagement. This program enables students to work on independent research projects under the direction of a SERC mentor ...
How do global environmental processes impact the health and wellbeing of populations in different places? Our programs focus on teaching and research for social change using a range of geographic methods. Our department offers a BA in Environmental Studies and a MA and PhD in Geography and Urban Studies.
The MS in Environmental Studies begins with a core of six courses that establish a foundation based in climate science, policy, ethics, history, ecology. and leadership. Students develop specific depth through their choice of concentration: Conservation Biology, Environmental Communications, or a Self-designed path developed in collaboration ...
Program Overview Additional Program Details Centers & Student Groups Admissions Tuition and Financial Aid Start your Antioch Journey PhD in Environmental Studies Home › Program Finder › PhD in Environmental Studies Find Solutions to Crucial Environmental Challenges Our doctoral program is founded on the conviction that theory and practice go hand-in-hand and that our most
Research published in The Lancet Planetary Health shows that the planet will only remain able to provide a basic standard of living for everyone in the future if economic systems and technologies are dramatically transformed and critical resources more fairly used, managed and shared.. The report, co-authored by over 60 leading natural and social scientists from the Earth Commission, including ...
• Senior Research Assistant II (Type C): Master's degree in environmental studies or related field plus 12 years of applicable work experience post degree. • Postdoctoral Scholar: Doctoral degree in environmental studies or related field. • Research Associate: Terminal degree in environmental studies or related field. • Senior Research ...
In a cutting-edge study published in the journal Energy & Environmental Science, researchers from the Interface Science Department at the Fritz Haber Institute have introduced a novel method for ...