common sense media rotten websites wiki

Common Sense Media is a San Francisco-based non-profit organization that provides education and advocacy to families to promote safe technology and media for children.

Founded by Jim Steyer in 2003, Common Sense Media reviews books, movies, TV shows, video games, apps, music, and websites and rates them in terms of age-appropriate educational content, positive messages/role models, violence, sex and profanity, and more for parents making media choices for their children. Common Sense Media has also developed a set of ratings that are intended to gauge the educational value of videos, games, and apps. The nonprofit's "Learning Ratings" attempt to assess different types of learning qualities within various forms of media.

It is primarily used by parents to see if media is "appropriate" and educational for their children.

Since 2021, Common Sense Media charges for unlimited access to its media reviews to cover the organization's expenses on running their website.

• 1.1 Overall
• 1.2 Reviews
• 2 Redeeming Qualities
• 3 Reception
• 5 References

Why It Lacks Common Sense [ edit | edit source ]

Overall [ edit | edit source ].

• In addition to inserting biased wording in their content, they deceive parents into using the site by adding Parents Need to Know at their reviews and advertising the site as unbiased by encouraging parents to read their "unbiased" reviews and by claiming that the reviews were made by expert reviewers and weren't influenced by the creators, media partners, or funders. In reality, the reviews contain some form of bias toward their ideology.
• Their writers write things like they’re panning something just because it’s not appropriate for a certain age group. Reviewers try to be as critical as they can in providing their reviews, always inserting some wording in the description that gives it a downside, like the repetitive use of "iffy content" in reviews and blogs.
• The most common hypocritical message is the "kids should not get screen time" excuse. They heavily promote their ideology of limiting children's screen time even after the COVID-19 pandemic , through their blogs [3] and their digital citizenship lessons categorized into Media Balance and Well-Being [4] . However, they created a blog called Why We Shouldn't Demonize Kids' Screen Time which is contrary to the aforementioned message.
• Doom 3 was given a 1/5 because the game not being appropriate for children, when at the time the star ratings for their older reviews were affected by age appropriateness. Yet they give every Grand Theft Auto game either a 4/5 or a 5/5 on CSM. Even Dead Space 2 got a perfect five. Another example is that they gave SpongeBob SquarePants a 3/5 for not being educational. Yet they gave The Loud House a 4/5 and there's nothing educational in that show.
• They believe in protecting the privacy of minors, yet they believe that parents should violate the privacy of minors by monitoring their Internet use which is brazen hypocrisy . Not to mention, they promote the violation of children's freedom of expression by parents via the overpromotion of parental restrictions and surveillance of minors' use of media.
• Recently they have a paid subscription service, where non-subscribers can only read up to 3 reviews per month . Although its subscription service intends to cover its website operating expenses, the monthly and yearly cost is too overpriced and unnecessary as the site is only for looking up reviews and not something more worthwhile such as streaming shows/movies! This shows that they just care about money now!

Reviews [ edit | edit source ]

• Some writers point out every little bad thing in a show they don't like because it often doesn't support their political opinions. But they fail to mention major bad things in shows they do like because they want to promote it and their political opinions. Then they give it 5 stars and mislead parents into letting their children watch it. This especially happens with one "writer" named Emily Ashby, and they rate content containing sexual misconduct against men positively because of their opinions, bashing entertainment that supports men's rights.
• Any websites, media, and articles that discredit politicians they don't like are immediately given five stars.
• Like IGN, it's at times a slave to Electronic Arts and Activision]].
• For instance, Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5 was given 3/5. Common Sense Media has also automatically given any Call of Duty game, almost any EA Sports game, and Star Wars Battlefront II (EA) 4/5.
• However, there are some EA Sports games that got a lower score than 4/5, examples are:
• Madden NFL 21
• The 2016 Ghostbusters game got 3/5 from Common Sense Media.
• Speaking of education, they think that every show must be educational and criticize ones that entertain rather than educate, due to their ideology of promoting educational values. Sometimes, they give niche audience shows a 4 or 5/5 solely because they are educational, which has no effect on the quality of a show.
• They gave A Christmas Story 5/5 because Ralphie "learned his lesson on swearing".
• It has also given Home Alone 4/5 because "it shows that kids can do just fine home alone and it shows that violence is a good way to solve problems". In reality, it is a bad idea to leave one's child behind when going on vacation. Additionally, if burglars break into your house, call the police .
• It gave Toddlers and Tiaras 2/5 but listed nothing about child abuse in their review. Judging by the review, they seem to have given it an extra star because it might teach children about pageants . Education is most certainly nowhere more important than having toddlers being sexualized, abused and treated like fashion accessories .
• They also gave Teen Titans Go! a 3/5 in positive messages, despite the show teaching children bad lessons and morals.
• Their review of Codename: Kids Next Door is a particularly bad offender, as they gave it a 1/5, referring to the series as "slapstick plus" and ignorantly claiming that it's little more than mean-spirited behavior and excessive violence.
• They gave 13 Reasons Why a 4/5, even though the show is infamous and controversial for glamourizing suicide into thinking it's a good thing when it really isn't.
• Similarly, they gave The Super Mario Bros. Super Show! a 1/5 for stereotyping Italians, which is ironic, considering Captain Lou Albano is Italian-American .
• They even gave the Jim Carrey movie Ace Ventura: Pet Detective a 1/5 because it's "dumb humor" and it doesn't really have any "positive messages" despite it being an OK movie in general. They also said it was "filled with gross-out humor", despite it mostly being slapstick comedy or just silly. (There is a scene where Ace throws up, but thankfully none is shown. The scene is also quite transphobic and hasn't aged well.)
• They gave many good shows including all 4 TMNT Animated Programs, a 2/5, saying that if it is not educational, they will get a bad score.
• They gave Crash of Cars a 1/5, even though the cars don't have any drivers visible in them, only shoot "blobs", and no blood/gore is shown.
• They gave the children's animated series Eliot Kid a 2/5, which is reasonable because the show's not very good in general, but it is because the protagonist's adventures involve breaking the rules.
• They are also overly sensitive sometimes, believing that slight crushes or relationships in children's media count as "sexy stuff". They also seem to think all insult words, exclamations, and potty words, such as, "stupid", "dumb", "jerk", "poop", "idiot", "shut up", "darn it", and even "heck", "loser" and "hopscotch" (which makes no sense since that's nowhere near a mean word) count as profanity.
• Whenever you search for something and you are not subscribed, most of the time, when you finally get to the page, an annoying low-quality pop-up appears telling you to subscribe in order to continue and blocks the entire view of the page.
• An example of a biased rating is their review of the 1995 Mortal Kombat film.
• Homestar Runner got a 15+, and the review is vague and short, only being two sentences long. As noted, the reviews also oppose the review. A post on Reddit mocks this as well.
• Their reviews for Godzilla: King of the Monsters and Godzilla vs. Kong are extremely biased. As they gave Godzilla: King of the Monsters and Godzilla vs. Kong a 2/5 just because they were focused more on the monsters and action and didn't have a complex plot. Do they seriously want a melodramatic soap opera about love triangles and politics in a giant monster movie?
• They are ridiculously biased towards Disney. They always give Disney movies and TV shows a 4/5 or 5/5 just because they are Disney. Even some mediocre or bad Disney movies like Chicken Little or Jonas Brothers: The 3D Concert Experience have good scores (more specifically a 3/5)!
• They actually give Child's Play or other movies a 2 or 1-star rating just because it's so-called dumb, they did this to other movies, here are some examples.
• They base many of their movie reviews more on ideology than on quality. For example, they gave The Red Pill a bad review and called Cassie Jay a bad role model simply because they didn't agree with her ideology.
• As for media aimed at teenagers and adults, Common Sense Media tends to treat them like children's media as well and hardly ever gives them positive reviews.
• Their 10 Worst TV Role Models list includes Seth MacFarlane characters, although his shows are not even intended for children . Heck, even CSM knows that by giving his shows 14-16+ age ratings.
• Their annual video game alternatives tend to be a joke. For example, the 2014 list Lego Marvel Super Heroes as a substitute for Grand Theft Auto V , even though it feels nothing like the latter, and Lego City Undercover would've been a better choice, since the whole game was meant to be a spoof of GTA, even if they may have mistook Lego City Undercover for Lego Marvel Super Heroes .
• In their "Violent Video Games of 2013 List", they put Gears of War 3 in it even though that game was released in 2011 .
• They think Avatar: The Last Airbender is anime. Anime means cartoon in Japanese, which means that an anime is a cartoon made in Japan, not because it has a detailed art style with jerky movements. In fact, Avatar is a Western cartoon just like SpongeBob SquarePants . Similarly, Panty & Stocking with Garterbelt , despite being animated in Flash, can be called an anime because it is Japanese.
• The Battle Cats ' App Details section is truly nightmare fuel, with a lot of false information about the game .
• The age ratings of some media are unfitting, like giving Warcraft 3 an 18+ when it has a T rating, or giving Silicon Valley , Schitt's Creek and F is For Family 14+ ratings even though all of them are rated TV-MA. It may have been lower due to the 2016 revamp, as Mad Max: Fury Road originally had an 18+, but reduced to 16+ after the revamp. Prior to the revamp, they would give M-rated games 18+ most of the time.
• Half of the things they say about the YouTubers are just either to keep hating with reasons that aren't true or just pure nonsense (which according to them is actually "common sense" apparently).
• They practically gave up on reviewing music, since their last reviewed album was 1000 Forms of Fear by Sia, released back in 2014.
• Some of the posters they use in their reviews lack research. A prominent one is used in the Cartoon Network website review, which is normal at first glance, but if one looks closely, SpongeBob is in it for some reason, although he is a Nickelodeon character.
• Being an American non-profit company, CSM rarely reviews content from other countries. For example, they cannot review a Canadian TV show aimed at kids called Being Ian even though it contains nudity!
• They gave the controversial French film Cuties on Netflix a 4/5 and gave it a 15+ age rating and kneeled to the extremely hypocritical message of the film. There isn't anything else to say about that.
• They claim they review websites, movies, TV shows, apps, video games, books, and even music, but they barely ever review books, apps, websites, or (and especially rarely) music. Most of them only review movies, TV shows, or video games.
• Ironically, they gave Halo 5: Guardians , which has pretty much the same levels of violence as the rest of the Halo games, a 13+ rating. They also gave it a perfect 5, despite it basically being the weakest game in the series.
• This could also mean that they did this to avoid criticism from parents that are against Cuties which they created the subscription service after they reviewed it.
• Some of the articles are either short, poorly made or incomplete.
• They gave the movie Foodfight a 2-star rating on their website which is considered one of the worst movies of all time, while movies that look superior compared to it such as Escape from Planet Earth were given a 1-star rating just because it is "violent" and forgettable, while Foodfight has tons more iffy and even worse stuff compared to Escape from Planet Earth.

Redeeming Qualities [ edit | edit source ]

• Sometimes it provides good information, such as listing actual inappropriate moments in media rather than just slight crushes or mild insults, and their articles sometimes give good tips on how to choose good media for children (for instance, how to take your kid to a movie theater for the first time).
• NBA 2K23 got a 4/5.
• Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare got a 4/5.
• The Legend of Zelda: Breath of The Wild got a 5/5.
• The reason that they mark normal non-physical relationships or general insults as profanity or sex can be attributed to the fact that they need to be really careful because there are parents out there who hate that stuff and don't want their children getting exposed to it.
• Their "expert review" videos, while they don’t show up a lot and are biased, are fairly well-edited.
• They can be considered a "so bad it's good" company.

Reception [ edit | edit source ]

Despite favorable reviews from some parents, Common Sense Media has been panned by the majority of the Internet, due to poor research, frequent errors, the introduction of costly paywalls, being too picky/gullible about lessons and educational values (like the majority of the reviews for Oggy and the Cockroaches), forcing parents to become more cautious about children's media usage, pitting children against parents, and indoctrinating children from their K-12 digital citizenship program. [5]

Trivia [ edit | edit source ]

• Almost all the reviews shown on the images in the gallery are from Rebecca Spark's alt accounts/main account.

References [ edit | edit source ]

• ↑ https://www.oif.ala.org/oif/common-sense-media-promoting-family-values-dictating/
• ↑ https://www.alsc.ala.org/blog/2016/04/reviews-common-sense-media/
• ↑ https://www.commonsensemedia.org/blog/screen-time?page=1
• ↑ https://www.commonsense.org/education/digital-citizenship/curriculum
• ↑ https://www.sitejabber.com/reviews/commonsensemedia.org

Videos [ edit | edit source ]

Comments [ edit | edit source ].

<comments/>

• Featured articles
• Critique websites
• Reliable Sources That Don't Qualify As Reliable Sources
• Propagandist Sites
• Mean-spirited websites
• Moral guardians
• Racist Websites
• Organizations

Navigation menu

Log in or sign up for Rotten Tomatoes

Trouble logging in?

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from the Fandango Media Brands .

By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and to receive email from the Fandango Media Brands .

By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes.

Email not verified

Let's keep in touch.

Sign up for the Rotten Tomatoes newsletter to get weekly updates on:

• Upcoming Movies and TV shows
• Rotten Tomatoes Podcast
• Media News + More

By clicking "Sign Me Up," you are agreeing to receive occasional emails and communications from Fandango Media (Fandango, Vudu, and Rotten Tomatoes) and consenting to Fandango's Privacy Policy and Terms and Policies . Please allow 10 business days for your account to reflect your preferences.

OK, got it!

• About Rotten Tomatoes®
• Login/signup

Movies in theaters

• Opening this week
• Top box office
• Coming soon to theaters
• Certified fresh movies

Movies at home

• Fandango at Home
• Prime Video
• Most Popular Streaming Movies
• Certified Fresh Movies
• What to Watch New

Certified fresh picks

• 81% Alien: Romulus Link to Alien: Romulus
• 88% Between the Temples Link to Between the Temples
• 100% Daughters Link to Daughters

New TV Tonight

• 93% Chimp Crazy: Season 1
• 100% Pachinko: Season 2
• -- That '90s Show: Season 3
• -- OceanXplorers: Season 1
• -- Classified: Season 1
• -- Reasonable Doubt: Season 2
• -- The Anonymous: Season 1
• -- Face to Face With Scott Peterson: Season 1
• -- Wyatt Earp and the Cowboy War: Season 1

Most Popular TV on RT

• 92% Bad Monkey: Season 1
• 78% Star Wars: The Acolyte: Season 1
• 96% Industry: Season 3
• 86% Average Joe: Season 1
• 54% The Umbrella Academy: Season 4
• 100% Dark Winds: Season 2
• 100% Supacell: Season 1
• 82% A Good Girl's Guide to Murder: Season 1
• 78% Presumed Innocent: Season 1
• Best TV Shows
• Most Popular TV
• TV & Streaming News

Certified fresh pick

• 92% Bad Monkey: Season 1 Link to Bad Monkey: Season 1
• All-Time Lists
• Binge Guide
• Comics on TV
• Five Favorite Films
• Video Interviews
• Weekend Box Office
• Weekly Ketchup
• What to Watch

Andrew Garfield Movies and Series Ranked by Tomatometer

30 Most Popular Movies Right Now: What to Watch In Theaters and Streaming

What to Watch: In Theaters and On Streaming

Awards Tour

Renewed and Cancelled TV Shows 2024

Edgar Wright Surprises Shaun of the Dead Superfans

• Trending on RT
• Re-Release Calendar
• Popular TV Shows
• Renewed and Cancelled TV
• Best New Horror Movies

Navigation menu

• Create account
• Contributions

Media Choice

Digital equity, digital literacy and citizenship, tech accountability, healthy childhood.

• 20 Years of Impact

London School of Economics Evaluation of Our Digital Citizenship Curriculum

AI Ratings and Reviews

• Our Current Research
• Past Research
• Archived Datasets

Getting Help Online: How Young People Find, Evaluate and Use Online Mental Health Tools and Information

Teen and Young Adult Perspectives on Generative AI: Patterns of Use, Excitements, and Concerns

• Press Releases
• Our Experts
• Our Perspectives
• Public Filings and Letters

Common Sense Media Announces Framework for First-of-Its-Kind AI Ratings System

Protecting Kids' Digital Privacy Is Now Easier Than Ever

• How We Work
• Diversity and Inclusion
• Meet Our Team
• Board of Directors
• Board of Advisors
• Our Partners
• How We Rate and Review Media
• How We Rate and Review for Learning
• Our Offices
• Join as a Parent
• Join as an Educator
• Sign Up for Our Newsletters
• Request a Speaker
• Partner With Us
• We're Hiring

Most technology wasn't built with kids in mind. We're on a mission to change that.

We believe in media that inspires and entertains families of all kinds. In technology that protects privacy and supports communities. In learning tools that prepare students and teachers for success in a connected world. Discover how we're working to make the digital world better for kids and families.

Discover our media ratings and reviews at Common Sense Media

Find our curriculum and classroom resources at Common Sense Education

See our most  recent research   on the impact of media on kids

Explore our advocacy efforts around   digital equity and  tech accountability

Our Approach

Together with our partners, we're working at every level to build a more healthy, equitable, and empowering future for all kids in the digital age.

Age-based reviews and ratings

Every day, families rely on our reviews of movies, apps, and more to make choices for their kids. We meet families where they're watching, reading, and buying with relevant, research-backed guidance.

Common Sense Media offers 45K trusted, independent ratings.

And reaches millions of parents at the point of decision via our business development partners.

Common Sense Media ratings and advice appear on platforms of 12 major distribution partners

reaching millions of parents and caregivers at the point of decision.

Curriculum, tools, and training

Now that there's a smartphone in almost every pocket, we need media literacy and digital citizenship in every school. We prepare educators and students for success.

1 million educators globally use digital citizenship resources from Common Sense Education .

75% of Title 1 schools in the U.S. teach digital citizenship with Common Sense Education .

Partnerships for positive impact

To meet the unique needs of diverse and underserved families, we work with a network of community partners to expand our reach and provide research-informed advice and education to support kids' healthy development.

Our Family and Community Engagement team reaches thousands of advocates, educators, and caregivers in their communities nationwide with support and information on media, tech, and kids.

Through our Tips By Text program, we have sent  nearly 1 million tips, advice, and information directly to parents and caregivers who need it.

Advocacy and policy change

Safeguarding online privacy. Closing the digital divide. Ensuring paid family leave and early childcare. We can achieve all this and more when we work together.

Our efforts were instrumental in passing the California Consumer Privacy Act which has set a blueprint for privacy legislation in the U.S.

Our team lobbied for the $100 billion included in the 2022 bipartisan infrastructure bill to connect homes, schools, and communities to high-speed internet.

10 million families

connected to high-speed internet thanks to the federal Affordable Connectivity Program, which Common Sense actively supported

124 million families

making informed choices about what to watch, read, and play

95% of students

confident in digital citizenship after learning with our curriculum

From high-quality media recommendations to internet access for all learners, we're making media and technology safer, healthier, and more equitable for kids everywhere. Learn about the issues we stand for below.

Reviews that make it easier to choose high-quality, age-appropriate, and diverse content for kids at home and in school.

Access to technology—and the support and tools to use it—for kids, families, schools, and communities.

Habits and skills that give young people agency over their digital lives and help them succeed online and in life.

Public- and private-sector reforms to safeguard privacy, minimize harm, and support healthy media and tech for all.

Advice, research, and community outreach to support kids' mental, physical, and emotional health and explore tech's effects on well-being.

The issues we stand for inform the work we do under our core brands:

Discover media you feel good about sharing with your kids and students.

Prepare your students to thrive in a digital world.

Recent Press & News

Top 5 Myths About Kids' Online Safety Legislation

Common Sense Media Beats Back Tech Lobby in New York With the Passage of Two Online Child Safety Bills

Social Media Helps and Hurts Youth. A New Report Shows How

Now, it’s your turn. Will you join us?

Donations power our essential programs and free resources for families and schools.

Philanthropic foundations and major media companies help sponsor and share our work.

Talk with one of our subject matter experts to cover our work and amplify our impact.

Thank you to our generous partners who make our work possible:

See all partnerships

Common Sense Media

Movie & TV reviews for parents

• For Parents
• For Educators
• Our Work and Impact

Or browse by category:

• Movie Reviews
• Best Movie Lists
• Best Movies on Netflix, Disney+, and More

Common Sense Selections for Movies

50 Modern Movies All Kids Should Watch Before They're 12

• Best TV Lists
• Best TV Shows on Netflix, Disney+, and More
• Common Sense Selections for TV
• Video Reviews of TV Shows

Best Kids' Shows on Disney+

Best Kids' TV Shows on Netflix

• Book Reviews
• Best Book Lists
• Common Sense Selections for Books

8 Tips for Getting Kids Hooked on Books

50 Books All Kids Should Read Before They're 12

• Game Reviews
• Best Game Lists

Common Sense Selections for Games

• Video Reviews of Games

Nintendo Switch Games for Family Fun

• Podcast Reviews
• Best Podcast Lists

Common Sense Selections for Podcasts

Parents' Guide to Podcasts

• App Reviews
• Best App Lists

Social Networking for Teens

Gun-Free Action Game Apps

Reviews for AI Apps and Tools

• YouTube Channel Reviews
• YouTube Kids Channels by Topic

Parents' Ultimate Guide to YouTube Kids

YouTube Kids Channels for Gamers

• Preschoolers (2-4)
• Little Kids (5-7)
• Big Kids (8-9)
• Pre-Teens (10-12)
• Teens (13+)
• Screen Time
• Social Media
• Online Safety
• Identity and Community

How to Prepare Your Kids for School After a Summer of Screen Time

• Family Tech Planners
• Digital Skills
• All Articles
• Latino Culture
• Black Voices
• Asian Stories
• Native Narratives
• LGBTQ+ Pride
• Best of Diverse Representation List

Multicultural Books

YouTube Channels with Diverse Representations

Podcasts with Diverse Characters and Stories

• Common Sense Says
• Parents Say 15 Reviews
• Kids Say 43 Reviews

Common Sense Media Review

Compelling concept, so-so execution; disturbing scenes.

Parents Need to Know

Parents need to know that writer-director M. Night Shyamalan's Old is a thriller that explores what happens when vacationing strangers are stranded on a beautiful beach that ages them at a remarkable rate. Like all of Shyamalan's movies, there are plot twists and turns, as well as a sustained sense of peril…

Why Age 14+?

High body count: Characters succumb to everything from water (drowning) to one a

Brief shot of a woman's bare back and butt as she undresses to swim in the nude.

Occasional "damn," "goddamn," and one use of "f--king."

Adults get special cocktails when they arrive at the resort.

Any Positive Content?

Guy and Prisca try to protect their kids and calm people when they can. Patricia

Not many overtly positive messages, but it does explore moral ambiguity of certa

Violence & Scariness

High body count: Characters succumb to everything from water (drowning) to one another (one person is stabbed to death, one is slashed but survives, another dies from blood poisoning). People have epileptic seizures, have emergency surgery, experience a host of other terrible things. Several dead bodies are shown; they decompose to bones and ash incredibly quickly.

Did you know you can flag iffy content? Adjust limits for Violence & Scariness in your kid's entertainment guide.

Sex, Romance & Nudity

Brief shot of a woman's bare back and butt as she undresses to swim in the nude. A woman flirts with a server. A married couple embraces and kisses. Teens hold each other; they have sex off camera and a teen girl gets pregnant.

Did you know you can flag iffy content? Adjust limits for Sex, Romance & Nudity in your kid's entertainment guide.

Did you know you can flag iffy content? Adjust limits for Language in your kid's entertainment guide.

Drinking, Drugs & Smoking

Did you know you can flag iffy content? Adjust limits for Drinking, Drugs & Smoking in your kid's entertainment guide.

Positive Role Models

Guy and Prisca try to protect their kids and calm people when they can. Patricia and Jarin try to gather everyone, ask them to voice their feelings, work together. As a nurse, Jarin helps take care of everyone as they get sick and exhibit symptoms. Trent and Maddox are devoted siblings. Main cast is moderately racially/ethnically diverse, including an interracial couple (Black and Asian), a Black musician, two White families, a couple of BIPOC supporting characters. Everyone is heterosexual. Several characters have different chronic illnesses or invisible disabilities. A man seems to have early onset dementia but turns out to be schizophrenic and behaves in a way that's drawn from stereotypes about mental illness (he's homicidal).

Positive Messages

Not many overtly positive messages, but it does explore moral ambiguity of certain kinds of research, as well as importance of truth-telling within families and sticking together in difficult circumstances.

Parents need to know that writer-director M. Night Shyamalan 's Old is a thriller that explores what happens when vacationing strangers are stranded on a beautiful beach that ages them at a remarkable rate. Like all of Shyamalan's movies, there are plot twists and turns, as well as a sustained sense of peril throughout. There's a considerably high body count, with several disturbing scenes of dead bodies/characters getting sick, a surprise pregnancy and birth, emergency surgery, and the implications of children growing into young adults in a matter of hours. Various characters have chronic illnesses that manifest themselves in frightening ways. While the only sex in the movie takes place off camera, there's kissing and a scene of a woman stripping to swim in the nude (her bare back and butt are visible). Language is fairly tame except for a few uses of "damn," "goddamn," and one "f--king." Adults get special cocktails. To stay in the loop on more movies like this, you can sign up for weekly Family Movie Night emails .

Where to Watch

Videos and photos.

Parent and Kid Reviews

• Parents say (15)
• Kids say (43)

Based on 15 parent reviews

Another great movie that makes us think from M. Knight Shyamalan

A wildly underrated thiller, what's the story.

M. Night Shyamalan 's creepy mystery/thriller OLD, based on the graphic novel Sandcastle , follows four groups of vacationing strangers who are visiting their resort's special private beach together for the day when they realize that something is going irrevocably wrong. A family of four -- dad Guy ( Gael García Bernal ), mom Prisca (Vicky Krieps), 11-year-old Maddox (Alexa Swinton), and 6-year-old Trent (Nolan River) -- arrives at a tropical resort in an unspecified location. The manager recommends an exclusive excursion to a private nature preserve's nearby beach. They join a wealthy multigenerational family that includes an English chief of surgery ( Rufus Sewell ), his elderly mother (Kathleen Chalfant), trophy wife Chrystal (Abbey Lee), and their 5-year-old girl, Kara. They also realize that there's a single man there, whom tween Maddox identifies as rapper Mid-Sized Sedan ( Aaron Pierre ). Soon after, young Trent discovers a dead woman in the water: the fellow resort-goer who'd gone to the beach with Mid-Sized Sedan earlier in the day. A final married couple -- nurse Jarin ( Ken Leung ) and psychologist Patricia (Nikki Amuka-Bird) -- appear amid the chaos, and it's soon clear that the beach has unthinkable effects on everyone. They're all aging approximately two years per hour, leading the kids to quickly morph into teen versions of Maddox ( Thomasin McKenzie ), Trent ( Alex Wolff ), and Kara ( Eliza Scanlen ).

Is It Any Good?

Shyamalan's thriller has a strong cast and an initially riveting concept, but it's uneven, and most of the best parts are revealed in the trailer. The performances are serviceable -- particularly Wolff, who's become an expert at the emotional range necessary for creepy horror/psychological thrillers. McKenzie is also notably good at portraying someone who's aged too quickly and is having trouble processing all of her complicated feelings. The adults range in effectiveness, with the striking Pierre (who's excellent in The Underground Railroad ) having little to do as the confused and quiet rapper, Sewell chewing up the scenery as an arrogant surgeon, and Bernal and Krieps trying to telegraph how a marriage on the rocks would react when faced with an unthinkable crisis. Stand-outs include Leung and Amuka-Bird, who play the story's sole likable and stable couple.

As in all of his films, Shyamalan also cast himself in a notable, more-than-cameo role, and, while it was predictable, he should have given himself an even smaller part. The twists here, once the titular premise is revealed, are underwhelming (and one is as obvious as Chekhov's gun). There's no gasp-worthy Sixth Sense or The Others moment, which is fine, but the "aha!" doesn't even matter much, because audiences may no longer be invested in the outcome. The best, freakiest parts of the movie rely mostly on the kids' accelerated growth, along with the physiological abnormalities that different characters face while aging a lot in one day (not a spoiler; it's right there in the title). Old ranks somewhere in the bottom half of Shyamalan's filmography, but even so it's worth a look -- if only to see the kids fast-forward into teens.

Talk to Your Kids About ...

Families can talk about the violence in Old . How much takes place on screen vs. off? How does that affect the way you feel about it? What's the impact of media violence on kids?

How does Old compare to Shyamalan's other movies? What are some of his movies' signature elements?

In this story, how do the diverse characters work together toward a common goal? Do they succeed? What do you think about the outcome?

Who, if anyone, do you consider a role model in the movie? What character strengths are on display?

Movie Details

• In theaters : July 23, 2021
• On DVD or streaming : October 19, 2021
• Cast : Gael Garcia Bernal , Vicky Krieps , Embeth Davidtz , Thomasin McKenzie , Alex Wolff
• Director : M. Night Shyamalan
• Inclusion Information : Indian/South Asian directors, Latino actors, Female actors
• Studio : Universal Pictures
• Genre : Thriller
• Topics : Brothers and Sisters
• Run time : 108 minutes
• MPAA rating : PG-13
• MPAA explanation : strong violence, disturbing images, suggestive content, partial nudity and brief strong language
• Last updated : August 5, 2024

Did we miss something on diversity?

Research shows a connection between kids' healthy self-esteem and positive portrayals in media. That's why we've added a new "Diverse Representations" section to our reviews that will be rolling out on an ongoing basis. You can help us help kids by suggesting a diversity update.

Suggest an Update

What to watch next.

The Sixth Sense

Thriller Movies

Related topics.

• Brothers and Sisters

Want suggestions based on your streaming services? Get personalized recommendations

Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

• Cast & crew
• User reviews

Alien: Romulus

While scavenging the deep ends of a derelict space station, a group of young space colonists come face to face with the most terrifying life form in the universe. While scavenging the deep ends of a derelict space station, a group of young space colonists come face to face with the most terrifying life form in the universe. While scavenging the deep ends of a derelict space station, a group of young space colonists come face to face with the most terrifying life form in the universe.

• Fede Alvarez
• Rodo Sayagues
• Dan O'Bannon
• Cailee Spaeny
• David Jonsson
• Archie Renaux
• 801 User reviews
• 211 Critic reviews
• 64 Metascore
• 1 nomination

Top cast 15

• 10-Year Old Punk #1
• 10-Year Old Punk #2
• 10-Year Old Punk #3

• Voice of MU

• Rook (facial and vocal reference)

• Rook (facial and vocal performance)
• All cast & crew
• Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

All 'Alien' Movies Ranked by IMDb Rating

More like this

Did you know

• Trivia Director Fede Alvarez sought out the special effects crew from Aliens (1986) to work on the creatures. Physical sets, practical creatures, and miniatures were used wherever possible to help ground later VFX work.
• Goofs When the characters first enter the space station, the artificial gravity briefly turns on and then off again. Shortly thereafter, they enter a room where several objects are hovering in mid-air. If the objects had momentum immediately after the gravity switched off they should be moving on a trajectory, and if not they should still be against the floor. Either way, they should not be unmoving several feet off the floor.

Andy : The solution for a claustrophobic astronaut is to give him more space.

• Crazy credits The 20th Century Studios fanfare freezes and turns ominous, as in Alien³ (1992) , leading into the film's opening scene. The logo itself suffers a burst of static and turns green.
• Connections Featured in Nerdrotic: The Acolyte: Force is Female CONFIRMED? The Death of Theaters - The Real BBC @MauLer @HeelvsBabyface (2024)
• Soundtracks Theme from Alien Written by Jerry Goldsmith

User reviews 801

• jtindahouse
• Aug 13, 2024

Women in Science Fiction

• When was Alien: Romulus released? Powered by Alexa
• When does this film take place in the Alien timeline?
• August 16, 2024 (United States)
• United States
• United Kingdom
• New Zealand
• Official Website
• Quái Vật Không Gian: Romulus
• Origo Studios, Budapest, Hungary
• 20th Century Studios
• Scott Free Productions
• Brandywine Productions
• See more company credits at IMDbPro
• $80,000,000 (estimated)
• $45,759,088
• $42,003,361
• Aug 18, 2024
• $113,846,699

Technical specs

• Runtime 1 hour 59 minutes
• Dolby Atmos
• IMAX 6-Track

Related news

Contribute to this page.

• See more gaps
• Learn more about contributing

More to explore

Recently viewed.