Grading Rubric | |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
|
Teaching excellence & educational innovation, creating and using rubrics.
A rubric is a scoring tool that explicitly describes the instructor’s performance expectations for an assignment or piece of work. A rubric identifies:
Rubrics can be used to provide feedback to students on diverse types of assignments, from papers, projects, and oral presentations to artistic performances and group projects.
Here we are providing a sample set of rubrics designed by faculty at Carnegie Mellon and other institutions. Although your particular field of study or type of assessment may not be represented, viewing a rubric that is designed for a similar assessment may give you ideas for the kinds of criteria, descriptions, and performance levels you use on your own rubric.
See also " Examples and Tools " section of this site for more rubrics.
CONTACT US to talk with an Eberly colleague in person!
Resource library.
Feel free to modify this sample rubric for assessing group work to meet your teaching needs.
Skills | 4 Advanced - Exceeds expectations | 3 Competent - Meets expectations | 2 Progressing - Does not fully meet expectations | 1 Beginning - Does not meet expectations |
---|---|---|---|---|
Contributions, Attitude | Always willing to help and do more. Routinely offered useful ideas. Always displays positive attitude. | Cooperative. Usually offered useful ideas. Generally displays positive attitude. | Sometimes cooperative. Sometimes offered useful ideas. Rarely displays positive attitude. | Seldom cooperative. Rarely offers useful ideas. Is disruptive. |
Cooperation with Others | Did more than others–highly productive. Works extremely well with others. Never argues. | Did their part of the work-cooperative. Works well with others. Rarely argues. | Could have done more of the work–has difficulty. Requires structure, directions, and leadership. Argues sometimes. | Did not do any work–does not contribute. Does not work well with others. Usually argues with teammates. |
Focus, Commitment | Tries to keep people working together. Almost always focused on the task and what needs to be done. Is very self-directed. | Does not cause problems in the group. Focuses on the task and what needs to be done most of the time. Can count on this person. | Sometimes not a good team member. Sometimes focuses on the task and what needs to be done. Must be prodded and reminded to keep on task. | Often is not a good team member. Does not focus on the task and what needs to be done. Lets others do the work. |
Team Role Fulfillment | Participated in all group meetings. Assumed leadership role as necessary. Did the work that was assigned by the group. | Participated in most group meetings. Provided leadership when asked. Did most of the work assigned by the group. | Participated in some group meetings. Provided some leadership. Did some of the work assigned by the group. | Participated in few or no group meetings. Provided no leadership. Did little or no work assigned by the group. |
Ability to Communicate | Always listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Provided effective feedback to other members. Relays a great deal of information–all relates to the topic. | Usually listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Sometimes talks too much. Provided some effective feedback to others. Relays some basic information–most relates to the topic. | Often listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Usually does most of the talking–rarely listens to others. Provided little feedback to others. Relays very little information–some relates to the topic. | Rarely listens to, shares with, or supports the efforts of others. Is always talking and never listens to others. Provided no feedback to others. Does not relay any information to teammates. |
Correctness | Work is complete, well organized, has no errors and is done on time or early. | Work is generally complete, meets the requirements of the task, and is mostly done on time. | Work tends to be disorderly, incomplete, not accurate, and is usually late. | Work is generally sloppy and incomplete, has excessive errors and is mostly late or not at all. |
Total Score: |
Questions & answers, laurel barnes.
As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:
To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
entation RubricFraming LanguageThis rubric is intended to guide faculty in scoring a group presentation and allow instructors to score groups both as a unit and for individual stud. nt's skills and contributions. The rubric emphasizes that an effective group presentation requires coordinati.
Group Presentation Rubric The teacher will use this rubric to evaluate each group's presentation. Students can look at this rubric so they may understand what they are being graded on. The Group Presentation Rubric will be combine with the Teammate Participation Rubric to determine your final grade for the project. Trait Criteria Points 1 2 3 4
> Group presentation rubric. Group presentation rubric. This is a grading rubric an instructor uses to assess students' work on this type of assignment. It is a sample rubric that needs to be edited to reflect the specifics of a particular assignment. Students can self-assess using the rubric as a checklist before submitting their assignment.
Group Classroom Presentation Sample Rubric Page 1Gro. p Classroom Presentation Sample Rubric - Page 1*Please note that this is a sample of a group presentation scoring rubric for y. ur reference and is not from any Graziadio class. Check with your professor for their sco. ExemplaryPresentation Content (Group grade) Presentation c.
iRubric EX647A3: This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your PowerPoint presentation project and group interaction. Each category in the far left column represents a component of the project that will be taken into consideration when calculating the final grade for this assignment. Review the rubric carefully before, during and after the creation of the PowerPoint presentation ...
Discuss this rubric with other members. iRubric B3WA45: This rubric is designed to assess the presentation of the group activity. The rubric should consider the performance of the group as a whole, as well as individual contributions.. Free rubric builder and assessment tools.
This year, we're excited to share a brand new printable group presentation rubric for teachers. It simplifies the grading process by providing clear, structured criteria to assess various aspects of student presentations. This rubric is divided into several key categories, each with specific performance indicators and corresponding point ranges.
Create free account. Teacherbot 30 Aug, 15:13:12. A rubric for a group presentation typically includes the following criteria: Content Knowledge: Assess the group's understanding and mastery of the topic. Are they able to explain and discuss the key concepts and ideas accurately and comprehensively?
BCom Learning Objective 5c. Plan and lead a seminar or tutorial discussion or work constructively in groups. Trait. Exemplary. Satisfactory. Unsatisfactory. E/S/U. Presenting: clarity of presentation. Tightly focussed; Well structured, theme is clear; Message very clear; Good timing.
Group Rubric for Presentations Group Members 4 3 2 1 Puntos Organization and Presentation of Topic Well-developed and organized presentation of topic; listeners are able to follow along easily; all important information is presented thoroughly and accurately. Developed and organized ...
Scoring Rubric for Group Presentations Competence Weighting /100 Criteria Comments A A- B+ B and below Introduction 10 Clearly defined background and relevance of policy issue. States objective precisely Defined background and general relevance of policy issue. Stated objectives General description of background and relevance of policy.
4- The group clearly worked together, with each team member making an important contribution to the eventual goal. 3- The group worked together some of the time, and most of the team members made ...
for the group to present (20 minutes total). All group members presented and preparation was evident for the most part. Highly effective in delivering a well-polished oral presentation within the time limit for the group to present (20 minutes total). All group members presented equally. Preparation was strongly evident.
Group often is not effective in delegating tasks and/or sharing responsibility. Voice Over Presentation or Oral Presentation. Presentation is clear and has no grammatical errors. Presentation has been rehearsed and there is eye contact with audience. Presentation is clear and has less than 2 grammatical errors.
iRubric A78826: This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your PowerPoint presentation project. Each category in the far left column represents a component of the project that will be taken into consideration when calculating the final grade for this assignment. Review the rubric carefully before, during and after the creation of ...
Majority of questions answered by only one member or majority of information incorrect. Presentation Skills. Regular/constant eye contact, The audience was engaged, and presenters held the audience's attention. Appropriate speaking volume & body language. Most members spoke to majority of audience; steady eye contact.
Title: Sample Rubric for PowerPoint Presentation Author: jessikle Subject: Sample rubric to outline the quality, content, and effectiveness expected of a well-constructed presentation as opposed to a weak one
A rubric is a scoring tool that explicitly describes the instructor's performance expectations for an assignment or piece of work. A rubric identifies: ... Example 3: Group Presentations This rubric describes a set of components and standards for assessing group presentations in history (Carnegie Mellon).
The first category for this type of rubric focuses on delivery, which looks at the skills needed for presenting ideas. Since a PowerPoint is meant to be shared with an audience, a part of your ...
PK !N·Bí¨ [Content_Types].xml ¢ ( ´•MOÂ@ †ï&þ‡f¯†.z0ÆPøqT 1ñºìNau¿²;¨ü{§ C€¢ÐK :ó¾ï³³¡3¸ù¶&û„˜´w ;Ïû, '½ÒnR°×ÑCïŠe …SÂx ›Cb7ÃÓ"Áh e¤v©`SÄpÍy'S°"å>€£Jé£ H?ã„ !?Ä øE¿ É¥w {Xy°áà J13˜Ý Óë É{€ Ën UVÁ´ ê ߢù³$‚Ik ‚ÑR Õù§Sk‡é- '"²îIS Ò 5lI¨*Û -º'º ¨ dÏ"⣰ÔÅ¿|T ...
Sample group work rubric - Center for Teaching Innovation
Sample Group Presentation Rubric - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. This rubric evaluates group presentations on several criteria including presentation content, design, oral delivery, notes/transcript, individual contribution, and timeliness. For each criterion, performance is rated on a scale from unsatisfactory to exemplary.
More fromLaurel Barnes. Description. A rubric to help making grading Group Presentations much easier! Total Pages. 1 page. Answer Key. N/A. Teaching Duration. N/A.
Other comments: Explain what you have learned about presentations from this experience. what I learned about presentations is to prepare as much as you can and make sure to time yourself when you preparing so you are on time and to look at the rubric and make sure you have everything you need for your presentation. To also balance out your evidence, your writing and your explanation.