Restricted to Repository staff only until 15 November 2024.
This thesis is composed of four essays on urban and spatial economics. The first two papers are empirical studies evaluating the impact of public policies in England – one looking at transport infrastructure and the other at flood management. The last two papers leverage satellite imagery to investigate the effects of floods and flood risk on urbanisation in developing countries. The first paper focuses on the impact of cycling infrastructure on road traffic in London. It demonstrates that providing segregated cycling lanes increases cycling flows without impacting motorised traffic. Not only do the cycling flows increase immediately after the opening of the dedicated lanes, but they also appear to be on a permanent steeper growth path. One primary causal mechanism investigated is the reduction in accidents along the cycling routes. The second paper analyses the role of natural disasters in local election results in England. It finds that at the electoral ward level, electors punish the incumbent party after a flood during local elections in England – but they are much more likely to do so if the incumbent party aligns with the party in power, both at the local authority and national government levels. There is no evidence that the political party alignment of the incumbent is a significant driving force. However, there is a clear pattern of more votes going to the UK Independence Party in the wake of a flood shock. The third paper of the thesis investigates the causal role of land scarcity and path dependence on the expansion of Chinese cities into high flood risk land. It finds that a naïve OLS regression overestimates the role topographic constraints play in driving urbanisation in high flood risk areas. Once instrumented for, land scarcity due to topographic constraints is not a driver of urbanisation in high flood risk areas: cities expand into high flood risk land despite having safe land to expand on. The last paper explores the medium-term effect of flooding on population growth in Sub- Saharan Africa. It finds that large floods in rural areas have long-term persistent effects on population growth but that the effects are mitigated in large urban areas. Using Demographic and Health Survey data, the paper finds that experiencing a severe flood is associated with worse health outcomes and a higher probability of being classified in the poorest wealth bracket, especially in rural areas. In the medium-term, the analysis shows sorting of the poorest households in high-flood risk areas. This is consistent with a higher out-migration rate from rural areas.
Item Type: | Thesis (PhD) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | © 2022 Louise Alice Karine Bernard |
Library of Congress subject classification: | |
Sets: | |
Supervisor: | Overman, Henry G. |
URI: |
Record administration - authorised staff only |
Downloads per month over past year
View more statistics
Berkeley's PhD in City & Regional Planning provides training in urban and planning theory, advanced research, and the practice of planning.
Established in 1968, the program has granted more than 160 doctorates. Alums of the program have established national and international reputations as planning educators, social science researchers and theorists, policy makers, and practitioners. Today, the program is served by nearly 20 city and regional planning faculty with expertise in community and economic development, transportation planning, urban design, international development, environmental planning, and global urbanism. With close ties to numerous research centers and initiatives, the program encourages its students to develop specializations within the field of urban studies and planning and to expand their intellectual horizons through training in the related fields of architecture, landscape architecture and environmental planning, civil engineering, anthropology, geography, sociology, public policy, public health, and political science.
Completing a PhD in City & Regional Planning at UC Berkeley usually takes five years. The university requires all doctoral students to fulfill a minimum residency requirement of two years and 48 units of coursework. Full-time students are expected to take four courses, or 12 units, per semester. For the PhD in City & Regional Planning, students must complete various program requirements, including courses in planning and urban theory; research methods courses; and preparation and completion of two fields of specialization. They must also successfully complete an oral qualifying examination, which allows them to advance to candidacy and undertake dissertation research. A PhD is awarded upon completion of a written dissertation approved by the faculty supervisors of the dissertation.
The PhD program encourages its students to build intellectual community and to participate in national and international venues of scholarship. Doctoral candidates regularly present their research at the annual conferences of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Association of American Geographers, Association of European Schools of Planning, World Planning Schools Congress, Urban Affairs Association, and American Anthropological Association. They organize and participate in a weekly research colloquium and manage the Berkeley Planning Journal , a peer-reviewed academic publication. Such activities utilize the incredible intellectual resources available to doctoral students at UC Berkeley, both within their departments and programs and across the campus.
Admission to the PhD program is highly competitive. Applicants are required to have completed a master's degree in planning or a related field. They are expected to demonstrate capacity for advanced research and to present a compelling research topic as part of their application. Once admitted to the program, students are eligible to compete for various university fellowships, including the Berkeley Fellowship, Cota-Robles Fellowship, and the Foreign Language and Area Studies Fellowship. Students of the program have also been successful in securing funding for dissertation research from the National Science Foundation, Social Science Research Council, and the Fulbright scholarships.
The Department of City & Regional Planning and UC Berkeley offer multiple types of financial support to its graduate students.
Please note that admission decisions are not made by individual faculty, but rather an admissions committee. Our PhD admissions process begins with three initial reviews of your application: the two faculty members you list as preferred advisors and one member of the PhD admission committee. The admission committee then meets to review all applications as a cohort and make admission/denial decisions. More information can be found on the department admissions page .
The principal admission requirements to the doctoral program in City & Regional Planning are overall excellence in past academic work and research, demonstrated creativity and intellectual leadership in professional activity, and the strong promise of sustained intellectual achievement, originality, and scholarship. The emphasis in the doctoral program is upon scholarship and research. At the same time, because the doctorate is offered in the context of a professional school, doctoral students are challenged to undertake applied research relevant to city and regional planning and policy problems. If you do not want to teach in planning or a related field, or to do advanced research, please reconsider applying to this program. Most doctoral students enter the program with a master's degree in planning or a related field. The Master of City Planning is regarded as a terminal professional degree, and is not comparable to mid-study Master of Arts or Master of Science degrees offered in anticipation of the doctorate.
Admission to the doctoral program is very competitive. Only six to eight students are admitted each year, sometimes from a pool of as many as 80 applicants. For all applicants to the doctoral program (even those required to take an English-language competency exam (TOEFL, TOEFL CBT, iBT TOEFL, or IELTS) the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) is optional; although prospective students who choose to take the GRE should do so before December to ensure timely receipt of scores. Applicants must also secure at least three letters of recommendation that can explicitly evaluate their intellectual capability and past research and academic work.
Please note that admission decisions are not made by individual faculty, but rather an admissions committee. DCRP's PhD admissions process begins with three initial reviews of your application: the two faculty members you list as preferred advisors and one member of the PhD admission committee. The admission committee then meets to review all applications as a cohort and make admission/denial decisions.
Many PhD students choose to pursue one or more of the designated emphases (DEs) offered through programs across campus. These DEs are unrelated to the outside field required by the City & Regional Planning PhD, and can be thought of instead as elective "minors" which provide opportunities for focused interdisciplinary work, mentorship, conference funding, research fellowships and an extra credential along with the doctoral degree. Common DEs pursued by DCRP PhD students include:
Archnet-IJAR
ISSN : 2631-6862
Article publication date: 1 May 2020
Issue publication date: 11 November 2020
The purpose of this research is to improve the understanding of what constitutes a successful thesis proposal (TP) and as such enhance the quality of the TP writing in architecture, planning and related disciplines.
Based on extended personal experience and a review of relevant literature, the authors proposed a conception of a successful TP comprising 13 standard components. The conception provides specific definition/s, attributes and success rules for each component. The conception was applied for 15 years on several batches of Saudi graduate students. The implications of the conception were assessed by a students' opinion survey. An expert inquiry of experienced academics from architectural schools in nine countries was applied to validate and improve the conception.
Assessment of the proposed conception demonstrated several positive implications on students' knowledge, performance and outputs which illustrates its applicability in real life. Experts' validation of the conception and constructive remarks have enabled further improvements on the definitions, attributes and success rules of the TP components.
The proposed TP conception with its 13 components is limited to standard problem-solving research and will differ in the case of other types such as hypothesis-based research.
The proposed conception is a useful directive and evaluative tool for writing and assessing thesis proposals for graduate students, academic advisors and examiners.
The research contributes to improving the quality of thesis production process among the academic community in the built environment fields.
The paper is meant to alleviate the confusion and hardship caused by the absence of a consensus on what constitutes a successful TP in the fields of architecture, urban planning and related disciplines.
Abdellatif, M. and Abdellatif, R. (2020), "Successful thesis proposals in architecture and urban planning", Archnet-IJAR , Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 503-524. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-12-2019-0281
Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2020, Mahmoud Abdellatif and Reham Abdellatif
Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode .
After the postgraduate student completes her/his coursework in a master programme or passes the comprehensive exam and becomes a doctoral candidate in a doctoral programme, s/he is allowed to submit a “Thesis Proposal” (TP) to her/his department whose main concern is to assess whether the topic is suitable for a graduate study and for the time and resources available ( Afful, 2008 ; Kivunja, 2016 ; Reddy, 2019 ).
The department then sends the submitted TP to higher bodies for official approval. Once approved, the TP becomes a legal binding or “a formal contract” ( Walliman, 2017 ) and “a statement of intent” ( Hofstee, 2006 ) between the researcher and the university. If the student adheres to all prescribed TP requirements within the specified time, s/he will be awarded the degree ( Leo, 2019 ).
Guided by his/her academic advisor, the student prepares the TP within which the researcher explains the research problem, questions, aim and objectives, scope, and methodologies to describe, analyse and synthesize the research problem and develop solutions for it ( Paltridge and Starfield, 2007 ). In addition, the proposal includes a brief about research significance and expected contributions; a preliminary review of literature; thesis structure and approximate completion timeline; and a list of relevant references ( Kivunja, 2016 ; Thomas, 2016 ; Kornuta and Germaine, 2019 ).
After decades of writing, supervising and refereeing master and doctoral theses in the fields of Architecture and Urban Planning, the authors noticed that TP's differ in format and content from a school to another. This may be considered a healthy matter because it gives room for flexibility that absorbs the variety of research problems and techniques. Yet, the absence of a consensus on what constitutes a successful TP could cause confusion and hardship to both students and advisors ( Kamler and Thomson, 2008 ; Abdulai and Owusu-Ansah, 2014 ). The review of literature indicates that TP writing has been tackled in depth in many fields (see for instance Gonzalez, 2007 ; Balakumar et al. , 2013 ; Eco, 2015 ; Kivunja, 2016 ; Glatthorn and Randy, 2018 ; Kornuta and Germaine, 2019 ). Apart from thesis proposal instruction and guideline manuals posted on universities' websites, the authors believe that there is a lack of in-depth research on the issue of producing successful thesis proposals in the fields of Architecture and Planning.
To propose a successful TP conception which determines the standard components of TP and sets specific definitions, attributes and rules of success for each component.
To apply the proposed conception on several batches of graduate students, then assess its impact on students' performance and output along the years of application.
To validate the proposed conception by getting the insights of experienced academics from architecture and planning schools worldwide, and as such, improve and finalize the conception.
To propose the Successful TP Conception , the authors relied on two sources: knowledge extracted from their extended experience and a review of relevant studies and instruction manuals and guidelines for preparing TP in several worldwide universities. The Conception has been applied on several batches of master and doctoral students from IAU, KSA for almost 15 years between 2005 and 2020 during their enrolment in three courses in the College of Architecture and Planning, IAU, KSA. These courses are “ARPL 603 Research Methods” and “BISC 600 Research Methods” for the master's level and “URPL 803 Seminar (3): Doctoral Research Methods” for the doctoral level.
From a total of 60 students, 39 students (65%) completed the survey; of whom 12 students (31%) were doctoral and 27 students (69%) were masters students.
- Improve their understanding of the components of a successful TP.
- Enhance their performance in developing their TP's.
- Conduct a more effective self-assessment of their developed TP's.
- Enhance their performance along other stages of producing their theses and dissertations.
- Maintain any other benefits adding to students' research capabilities.
The first part recorded the general characteristics of respondents.
The second inquired about experts' viewpoints on the definitions, attributes and the rules of success of the components of the proposed TP conception.
2.1 components of a tp for a standard problem-solving research type.
A review of thesis writing guidelines posted on universities' websites and other related literature has indicated that the number of components of a masters' or doctoral thesis proposal varies. After a thorough review of related literature and with their experience, the authors have been convinced that, in its standard form, a TP should include 13 components. Chronically arranged, as appearing in the proposal, they are: title page, abstract, keywords, background, statement of the problem, research questions, research aim and objectives, research scope, research significance and contributions, preliminary review of literature, research methodology, thesis structure and timeline, and references list ( Ostler, 1996 ; Simpson and Turner, 2004 ; Zhou, 2004 ; Davies, 2011 ; Axelrod and Windell, 2012 ; Donohue, 2018 ; Glatthorn and Randy, 2018 ; Kornuta and Germaine, 2019 ). It is worth mentioning that these 13 components will differ in the case of a hypothesis-based research whose aim is to validate a specific hypothesis that a specific variable/s is/are or is/are not the main cause/s of an investigated research problem. This paper is limited only to the standard problem-solving research type.
Setting a general definition for each component including its meaning, importance, functions and contents.
Outlining the most important attributes that must be considered when writing the component.
Based on step 1 and 2, the authors extracted a list of success rules which provides a concise definition for each component of the TP, and/or describes the relationship between the component and other components of the TP (the list is summarized at the end of Part 2).
This is the first item that appears to the reader. It invites or detains him/her from proceeding to other contents ( Blaxter et al. , 2010 ). The research title is positioned in the title page along with several basic data, namely, the title; the names of the Department, College, University, study programme, researcher and advisory committee; and submission date.
The research title should be useful, discussing an issue critical to society; true, conveying a real message about the investigated problem ( Donohue, 2018 ); concise, presenting the message with the minimum number of words; adequate, using the right wording to explain the intended meaning; and attractive , stimulating the reader's attention. Iterations in refining the research title go hand-in-hand with refining the research question ( Groat and Wang, 2013 ).
It is the first item that appears in the TP after the title and of the same significance; yet, it is the last to be written ( Kornuta and Germaine, 2019 ). It has a marketing function ( Lamanauskas, 2019 ); it calls the reader in or alienates him out. A comprehensive abstract contains a summary of the problem, aim, scope, methodology, importance, contributions and outline ( Koopman, 1997 ).
The Abstract should be concise or brief with a maximum of 200–300 words; adequate, including profiles of all parts of the proposal; clear, expressing its message without ambiguity; and interrelated, serving as a body of sequential, coherent and connected ideas ( Blaxter et al. , 2010 ).
These are a set of words or terms used for archiving, tabulation and electronic search on databases. They should include essential “subject terms” describing the research topic, the unique sub-specializations and focus of the research (what is researched), the contextual scope of the research (where and when), and the used research methodology (how to conduct the research) ( Lamanauskas, 2019 ). They are better written by splitting the title into its separate single words or terms which must be found in the abstract, as well ( Mack, 2012 ).
Keywords should be brief, not more than 8–12 words; adequate, conveying the research theme, scope, aim and approach; exact, focusing on the investigated topic and scope; and standard, using scientific terminology used in the field.
This is a gradual preparation of the reader from the larger scientific field to the specific field, from the wider geographic area to the immediate area, and from the larger timeframe to the immediate one. It starts from the strategic level and general scope of the research and gradually reaches the level closer to the examined problem ( Abdellatif and Abdellatif, 2005 ). It places the study within the larger context of the research, creates interest to the reader and catches his attention, and includes quotations and statistics leading the reader to proceed ( Babbie, 2014 ).
The background statement should be striking, drawing the reader's attention to the research; brief, not lengthy; gradual, moving from the general level surrounding the investigated issue to the specific level; and careful, not speeding up in disclosing the study problem, aim or methodology to the reader ( Axelrod and Windell, 2012 ; Pautasso, 2013 ).
Statement of the General Research Problem is a narrative describing a negative aspect/s prevailing in the investigated urban environment/ecosystem or architectural setting; it is equivalent to the negative wording of the research aim ( Abdellatif and Abdellatif, 2005 ). It stimulates interest in the study; scientifically explained to convey a simple, clear and specific issue to which a reader can relate and is useful to the society at large ( Balakumar et al. , 2013 ). In the humanities and social sciences many dissertations endeavour to establish the conditions of the problem, not to solve it ( Dorst, 2011 ).
In formulating the research problem, it is useful to consider it a problem which hinders the natural development of the society and/or environment and leads to a decline in the Quality of Life (QOL) or Quality of Environment (QOE) or both. A development problem is a factor/cause leading to either a quantitative or qualitative deficiency in satisfying a human need or both such as a lack of certain service or inadequate provision of the service ( Abdellatif, 2015 ). To arrive at a successful statement of the general problem, the researcher should pinpoint the main cause/s behind the study problem. All what comes next depends on the clarity of the problem statement.
Technically oriented research (TOR), which places emphasis on the process and procedures as the primary basis of effective design, TOR can be either systematic, or computational, or managerial.
Conceptually driven research (CDR), which can be either psychological or person–environment. The psychological type is driven by the goal of matching knowledge with the nature of the design problem, its components, context and social and environmental requirements. Whereas, the person–environment type places emphasis on the socio-cultural and socio-behavioural factors as they relate to the design process itself and to settings, buildings and urban environments.
Classify the investigated situation to branched dimensions, e.g. demographic, planning, regulatory, economic, social, environmental, etc.
Trace the causes or the influencing factors that lead to the emergence or aggravation of the problem/s in each dimension.
Clarify the problem more by identifying the consequences or adverse effects (the symptoms of the problem) that resulted from those causes. This helps isolate the causes from the consequences to focus on treating the causes not the consequences. Using temporary painkillers will not eliminate the disease; it only tranquilizes the symptoms.
Statement of the consequences of the problem is a narrative that describes the negative effects caused by sub-problems on the investigated environment ( Goetz et al. , 2005 ).
The statement of consequences of the problem should be focused, where each consequence focuses on one independent sub-problem; articulate, not overlapping with other consequences; rooted, relating to one of the roots of the general problems; deep, providing description for specific symptom; and comprehended, could be perceived, described and determined ( Abdellatif, 2015 ).
What is the nature of the development problem as defined by the latest findings of previous literature, similar studies and published statistical reports?
What are the key features of the investigated problem according to a direct field survey?
What are the appropriate links between different variables of the study (causes, consequences, etc.) according to the information gathered from the theoretical review and field surveys?
What are the extracted results and the appropriate solutions and/or recommendations to deal with the general research problem and its sub-problems?
What are the critical contributions of the research findings on the life and/or environmental qualities?
How can the research increase the benefits of research results on the ground?
What are the research areas/points that need further investigation?
Research questions should be specific, each question addresses one sub-problem; unduplicated, each question does not repeat itself in a different format; sequential, or arranged according to their importance and order; and interrelated, where each question relates to other questions.
The general aim of the research is a specific and clear statement presenting the overall purpose of the study. It is directed to find an appropriate and effective solution to the general research problem ( Donohue, 2018 ). It is an attempt to fill a gap between a negative reality of an environment/ecosystem/or development situation and a desired positive future to be achieved at the end of the research process ( Glatthorn and Randy, 2018 ). The aim should be properly stated to ensure the success of all the following stages of the scientific research process.
Exploring the problem by defining the research problem, formulating aim and objectives, designing the methodology, defining the scope, and highlighting the expected contributions.
Collecting secondary data by defining basic concepts and terms, reviewing relevant literature and previous studies, and describing the most important characteristics of the investigated environment from secondary sources and statistical reports.
Collecting primary data via direct field surveys and based on the views of concerned population, experts and officials to describe the characteristics of the investigated development problem.
Analysing the gathered data by using theoretical and field data to determine the appropriate links among different variables of the study (e.g. causes, consequences, etc.).
Synthesizing the gathered data by integrating the findings of analysis to build appropriate approaches or solutions to deal with the general problem.
Extracting conclusions and writing recommendations to highlight research findings and make them more useful and effective.
A micro level objective contributes to solving the specific investigated problem (e.g. a specific quantitative or qualitative problem that hinders the development of a sector of society, environment, or eco-system).
A macro level objective contributes to realizing a higher goal (e.g. improving the overall quality of life of a larger community, upgrading the quality of the larger environment, etc.).
Development objectives should apply the SMART goal rule (previously explained); and be non-overlapping by ensuring that each objective is focused and not conflicting with other objectives.
Thematic scope clarifies the general and specific areas of the research (e.g. the research falls within the field of sustainable development in general and focuses on social sustainability).
Geographic/Spatial scope specifies the spatial boundaries of the physical environment within which the research is applied (e.g. a specific local or regional setting).
Temporal scope shows the past, present and future spans the research will cover indicating the number of years from the historical information inventory until the expected completion date. If the research aim is to develop future strategies or policies, the span will extend to future target point.
Research Scope should be categorized, by being classified by subject, place and time; focused, by reaching the closest limits of the investigated research problem, environment and time; and clear, by not being so general or ambiguous.
They highlight the most important benefits and the main beneficiaries from solving the research problem; the potential positive impacts of the study on the life and environmental qualities ( Groat and Wang, 2013 ). Contributions differ in nature (theoretical or applied or both) and in size (huge, average, or marginal). There is a positive relationship between the size of contributions and the size of impacted beneficiaries (individuals, groups, institutions, communities, societies), the scale of the impacted geographic boundaries (local, national or global), the type of impacted development sectors (service, production, etc.) and the numbers of the impacted sectors (one, a few, or all sectors). Research significance increases as the size of contributions increases. Specifying the research significance, expected contributions and potential beneficiaries helps promote the research and provides rational justifications for conducting it. The higher the contributions and the greater the sectors of the beneficiaries, the more significant the research is ( Abdellatif and Abdellatif, 2005 ). According to Balakumar et al. (2013) research significance justifies the need for the research that is being proposed.
Research significance and expected contributions should be categorized, in terms of type (theoretical or applied contribution or both), size and nature of the beneficiaries (individuals, institutions, communities, etc.) and geographical extent (small site, district, city, region, nation, etc.); clear, simple and comprehensible to the reader; and realistic, real, accurate and not exaggerated.
This is an initial review of literature dealt with relevant problems. It aims to build an initial understanding of the problem, identify the most important variables that have been considered, cite methodologies used to deal with the problem; make use of the latest findings and record the various recommendations/solutions suggested to deal with the problem ( Hart, 1998 ; Grix, 2001 ). According to Dunleavy (2003) , it is a critical review on related recent research that is well documented, structured, analysed and synthesized. It offers the researcher an opportunity to engage with other scholars in one's disciplinary community.
In addition to having a separate part, it is useful to combine the literature review with other components of the TP (e.g. the research problem, questions, aim and objectives, and methodology). It is important that the review presents differing perspectives or contrasting views of the topic and reports the complexities of the issue ( Kornuta and Germaine, 2019 ). By conducting the review, the researcher becomes able to build an initial but comprehensive understanding of the causes and consequences of the problem, the methodologies used to study and analyse the problem and the solutions proposed to deal with it by synthesizing various viewpoints of previous studies, thereby, supporting her/his principle argument about the study problem with the results derived from previous literature ( Pautasso, 2013 ).
Definitions of key terms and concepts; standard terms to appear in the research and special concepts which are not formally provided by previous scholars. The definitions must be logic and derived from scientifically recognized sources.
Review of previous studies; focusing on identifying several issues, namely, the most important dimensions and variables of the research problem (the causes of the problem; why the problem has emerged or aggravated; the most important consequences of this problem on the human and/or physical environment); the methods used to deal with the problem; the latest findings of previous studies and the various approaches/solutions suggested to deal with the problem.
Contextual aspects of the investigated development situation; including a review of relevant characteristics of the researched environment (its basic dimensions and elements) as found in previous studies. Contextual aspects may be classified into physical and human components; or into environmental, functional, aesthetic, structural, economic and social design determinants; or into demographic, planning, regulatory, economic, social, environmental sectors or other classifications.
Preliminary review of literature should be indexed, from reliable scholarly sources; categorized or documented according to standard classification system; employed, used wisely to achieve a desired purpose; up to date, recent, however, in topics which address chronological development or evolutionary aspects references could be recent and old; and related, relevant to the study problem ( Hart, 1998 ).
Data collection methods including office methods used to collect secondary data from previous literature and case studies as well as field methods used to gather original data through field visits, surveying, questionnaires, interviews with stakeholders, etc.
Data analysis methods including methods used to analyse both the secondary and primary information collected from office and the field surveys such as Statistical Analysis, Environmental Scanning (SWOT), Development Components Analysis, etc.
Data synthesis methods including methods used to compile, synthesize the analysis and develop appropriate alternative scenarios or solutions to deal with the problem.
Data presentation methods including methods to present the research process and findings such as scientific research paper containing narratives, tables, figures, forms, maps, results and recommendations as well as final visual presentation to review panel to get remarks and write the last version of the TP.
Research methodology should be appropriate, aligned with the purpose/s in which they will be used; achievable, within the reach of the researcher; effective, achieving the purpose fast and with high quality; reliable, previously tested, applied and approved in similar cases; and precise, accurate and specific.
This is a brief statement of the main sections of the master's/doctoral thesis with tentative dates for completing the various stages of the research. Careful preparation of research structure and timeline ensures the effectiveness and integrity of the plan of actions towards the completion of the study ( Kivunja, 2016 ). It is also a criterion to judge the achieved progress and seriousness of the researcher.
Research structure and timeline should be sequential, arranged according to a standard scientific research process; logical, proportionate to the total period available for completion; and balanced, distributing time properly among various stages.
This is a list which contains a reasonable number of relevant references on the topic which were actually cited in the TP ( Kornuta and Germaine, 2019 ). Including a list of the references about the topic demonstrates that the researcher is familiar with the basic and latest knowledge on his/her problem.
The list of references should be relevant, closely related to the investigated subject; up to date, recent yet containing old and new according the topic and context; and reliable, published in dependable vessels.
Based on the above definitions and attributes provided for each of the 13 TP components, the authors were able to extract a number of success rules that took the form of equations, each of which describes an equality function between each component and its counterpart component/s as shown in Table 1 . For instance, rule #1 shows that “research title” is equal to “the general aim of the research” and is equal to “the negative wording of the research problem”.
They better understood the meanings of each component (97% agree and strongly agree and 3% neutral).
They better understood the attributes of each component (94% agree and strongly agree and 6% neutral).
They better understood the rules which control the relations between the various components of the TP (87% agree and strongly agree and 13% neutral).
The process of writing the proposal has become easier and more convenient (100% agree and strongly agree).
The effort, cost and time spent in submitting the proposal have been substantially saved (87% agree and strongly and 12% neutral).
The relationship with academic advisor has improved (87% agree and strongly agree and 12% neutral).
The students' confidence in advancing their own learning abilities has improved (93% agree and strongly agree and 7% neutral).
The students' abilities to address the strengths and weaknesses of their personal skills have improved (93% agree and strongly agree and 7% neutral).
The students' abilities to manage their learning process more independently have improved (90% agree and strongly agree, 7% neutral and 3% disagree).
The students have created a clearer and better mutual understanding with their academic advisors (90% agree and strongly agree and 10% neutral).
The students have reduced their distraction from the original target set out in the proposal (81% agree and strongly agree, 16% neutral and 3% disagree).
The students have been able to finish their research on time (78% agree and strongly agree, 19% neutral and 3% disagree).
They gained better analytical skills (87% agree and strongly agree, 10% neutral and 3% disagree).
They gained better problem-solving skills (87% agree and strongly agree, 10% neutral and 3% disagree).
They gained better critical thinking skills (87% agree and strongly agree, 10% neutral and 3% disagree).
Having proposed, applied and assessed the Successful TP Conception, it becomes important to validate it using the insights of experienced academics from Architectural and Planning schools worldwide. This part summarizes the results of the experts' inquiry survey conducted in November 2019 to February 2020. It shows the characteristics of experts and their viewpoints and remarks on the originally proposed definitions, attributes and success rules.
They were from nine countries, namely, the United States of America, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Bahrain.
About 75% of the experts were males and 25% were females. About 5% were 35–45 years old, 20% were 45–55 years, 55% were 55–65 years and 20% were 65 years and over.
About 5% were Assistant Professors, 10% Associate Professors and the majority (85%) were Professors.
The experts had teaching experiences in undergraduate and graduate levels (masters, doctoral, diploma, postdoctoral and continuing professional development).
The general specialization of 70% of the experts was Architecture and 30% of experts were specialized in Urban Planning. They taught in several built environment fields (Architecture, Interior Design, Building Technology, Urban Design, Landscape Architecture and Urban and Regional Planning).
The experts had several focus areas, namely, Architecture, History and Theories of Architecture, Assessment of Designed Environments, Design Methods, Pedagogy, Architecture and Digital Technologies, Heritage Conservation, Middle East Architecture and Cities, Construction Project Management, Urban Design, Spatial Development Planning, Landscape, Built Environment and Behaviour, Urban Studies, Techniques and Quantitative Methods of Urban Planning, Urban Conflict, Urban Justice, Community Development, Environmental Management and Planning and Development Approaches.
About 10% of the experts supervised 5 theses, 5% supervised 6–10 theses, 50% supervised 11–20 theses and 35% supervised more than 20 theses.
Concerning the proposed definitions of the TP components, the experts expressed their agreement which ranged between 73 and 96%. Some experts provided additional remarks to help improve the definitions. Table 2 presents the originally proposed definitions, the percentages of agreed experts and their additional remarks.
Regarding the attributes of each component of the TP, the original conception proposed 38 attributes, the experts added 18 attributes resulting in a total of 56 attributes. Table 3 presents a matrix showing the percentages of experts' agreement of the originally proposed attributes as well as the added attributes. The lowest agreement percentage was 59% and the highest was 96%.
Concerning the proposed success rules which were called “equations” in the originally proposed conception, the experts suggested to change the expression into “rules”; which is more appropriate for subjective contents than mathematical expression. Table 4 presents the final 19 success rules for the components/sub-components of a TP and the percentage of experts' agreement which ranged between 57 and 95%.
Based on their experience in preparing and supervising masters and doctoral theses and after a thorough review of the literature on preparing thesis proposals, the authors drafted a conception of a successful thesis proposal comprising specific definitions, attributes and rules for each of the 13 components of a standard TP. The conception had been applied over a duration of 15 years (2005–2020) on several batches of master and doctoral students in IAU, KSA. Through an online survey, the majority of students (78–100%) have indicated that understanding and applying the conception helped them improve their performances and outputs during the TP development process and beyond.
The conception was then validated by getting the insights of 39 experienced academics from worldwide architectural schools. The experts accepted the proposed definitions with (73–96%) agreement rate. The experts also accepted the proposed attributes with (59–96%) agreement rate. As for the success rules, the experts' agreed as well with an acceptance rate ranging from (57–95%). The experts suggested constructive remarks which were considered in writing the final version of the conception.
The extracted success rules combine the definitions and attributes of each component of the TP and present them in a concise statement which defines the component and, where applicable, exemplifies its relationship to another corresponding or counterpart component of the TP. For example, rule #1 shows that “research title” should reflect “the general aim and scope of the research” and should also reflect “the negative wording of the research problem”. Extracted also is rule #14 which indicates that “the whole thesis proposal” written in future tenses, should resemble “the introduction of the final thesis” written in past tenses.
A directive tool that assists the researcher in writing a sound TP. Combining the last three tables (2, 3 and 4) into a comprehensive checklist would aid the students in preparing their TP's; enhancing the quality of their performance and outputs.
An evaluative tool that helps in assessing the validity and integrity of the submitted TP's that can be used by the researcher for self-assessment, or by the academic advisor, or by an examiner/evaluator before sending the proposal to higher authorities for approval.
The findings of this paper could be useful not only in evaluating thesis proposals, but also, with proper modifications, in assessing various scientific research documents, including scientific thesis, research papers and others; which is another research topic that will be addressed in the future.
The stages of developing the successful thesis proposal conception
Proposed list of success rules for the TP components
# | Research proposal component | Equals | The corresponding component |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Research title | = | The general aim of the research |
= | Solving the main research problem | ||
2 | The abstract | = | Profiles of all components of the research proposal |
3 | Keywords | = | Title in a fragmented manner |
= | Words that compose the research title | ||
4 | Background | = | Gradual preparation of the reader to enter the study |
5 | The statement of the problem | ||
5–1 | General problem of research | = | The main cause of quantitative or qualitative deficiency in the investigated environment |
5–2 | Research sub-problems | = | The secondary causes of each sub-problem of the general problem |
5–3 | Research consequences | = | Subsidiary symptoms of the general illness of the examined environment |
6 | Research questions | = | Presenting general problem and sub-problems of the research in the question format |
7 | Research aims, goals and objectives | = | Specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and timely goals |
7–1 | General aim of the research | = | Solving the general problem of the research |
7–2 | Procedural objectives of the research | = | Research stages |
= | Sections or chapters of the thesis | ||
7–3 | Development objectives of the research | = | Solving sub-problems of the study |
= | Finding a cure for the secondary causes of the problem | ||
8 | The scope of the research | = | Thematic, geographical and temporal limits of the study |
9 | Importance of the study and expected contributions | = | expected positive impacts of research (theoretical, practical or both) |
10 | Preliminary review of literature | = | Building a comprehensive conception from previous studies about the causes and consequences of the problem, the methodologies used to understand and analyse it, the most important findings and the solutions developed to deal with it |
11 | Research methodology | = | Techniques, methods and tools used in each stage of study |
12 | Research skeleton and completion timeline | = | Main chapters of research along the completion timeline |
= | Stages of the scientific research process along the completion timeline | ||
12 | List of references | = | Latest local and international references about the research |
14 | Thesis proposal (using future tenses) | = | General introduction of the final thesis (Using past tenses) |
# | Component of a thesis proposal | % of experts agreement of | Experts additional remarks | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Proposed definition | % | |||
1 | Research title | The first item that appears to the reader. It invites the reader to proceed to other contents | 73 | It should be reflective of research topic, questions, objectives, content and approach and convey the aim, the purpose, the scope and the outcome |
2 | The abstract | The first item that appears in the TP after the title and of the same significance. It calls the reader in or alienates him out | 79 | Although some experts commented that in several schools an abstract is not a compulsory component of TP, 79% of the experts agreed that the abstract is needed |
3 | Keywords | A set of words or terms used for archiving, tabulation and electronic search on databases | 75 | Keywords are better written by splitting the title into its separate single words or terms. They should include essential terms describing the research topic, the unique sub-specializations and focus of the research (what is researched), the contextual scope of the research (where and when) and the used research methodology (how to conduct the research) |
4 | Background | A gradual preparation from the larger scientific field to the specific field, from wider geographic area to the immediate area, and from the strategic level to the level closer to the examined problem | 74 | The background should place the study within the larger context of the research, create interest to the reader and catch his attention, help him understand why the study is significant, include limitation and arguments of pervious research, and include quotations and statistics leading the reader to go to the next component of the TP |
5 | Statement of the problem | |||
5–1 | Statement of the general research problem | A narrative describing a negative situation prevailing in the investigated urban environment/ecosystem or architectural setting | 92 | A statement which stimulates interest in the study; scientifically explained to convey a simple, clear and specific issue to which a reader can relate”; “equivalent to the negative wording of the research aim”; and “in the humanities and social sciences many dissertations endeavour to establish the conditions of the problem, not to solve it |
5–2 | Statement of the research sub-problems | A narrative that describes the general problem in detail; sub-problems are simply the various causes of the general problem | 84 | One expert commented that “the above definition is valid and useful in causal research types only; other research types might consider different approaches” |
5–3 | Consequences of the problem | A narrative that describes the effects of sub-problems on the investigated environment | 83 | None |
6 | Research questions | A set of questions the research tries to answer. Each question usually covers one of the research sub-problems | 96 | None |
7 | Research aim/goal/objectives | The goal should be Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Timely | 96 | None |
7–1 | General aim of the research | A specific and clear statement presenting the overall purpose of the study | 96 | None |
7–2 | Procedural objectives of the research | The sub-goals emanating from the main aim of the study. They provide a roadmap and illustrate important stages leading to sequential targets towards achieving the general aim | 79 | They are articulated sub-goals that in their totality compose the main research aim |
7–3 | Development objectives of the research | The objectives which focus on solving the research sub-problems and eventually solving the main problem of the investigated situation | 74 | None |
8 | Research scope | A statement which defines the thematic, geographical/spatial and temporal limits of research | None | |
9 | Research significance and contributions | Highlight potential positive impacts of the study on the life and environmental qualities | 87 | Expected contributions can only be tentative in the early research proposal stage, the researcher must remain open to unexpected findings upon the finishing stage of his/her study |
10 | Preliminary review of literature | Builds an initial understanding of the problem, identify the most important variables considered, cite methodologies used; make use of the latest findings and record the various recommendations/solutions suggested | 91 | Related directly to the stated research questions; identify areas of controversy in the literature; describe the relationship of each work to others; point the way forward for further research; and be organized into categories or themes |
11 | Research methodology | Contains explanation of the appropriate methods to be used in data collection, analysis, synthesis and presentation; for the extraction of results; and for the development of appropriate approaches or solutions to deal with the research problem | 82 | None |
12 | Research structure and timeline | A brief statement of the main sections of the master's/doctoral thesis arranged on the tentative dates for completing the various stages of the research | 95 | None |
13 | List of references | A list which contains a reasonable number of relevant references on the topic | 82 | None |
An extracted list of success rules for thesis proposals
Rule # | % of experts agreed | Success rule | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Component of a thesis proposal | Relationship nature (→) | Its concise definition (and/or) its relationship to another component/s | ||
1 | 60% | Research title | Should reflect | The general aim and scope of the research |
The negative wording of the research problem | ||||
2 | 75% | The abstract | Should be | A concise brief of all necessary components of the research proposal |
3 | 74% | Keywords | Should include | Terms representing research title, topic, unique sub-specializations, methodology and scope |
4 | 74% | Research background | Should cover | A gradual contextual literary analysis relevant to the study preparing the reader to enter the study |
5 | The statement of the problem | |||
5–1 | 73% | Statement of the general research problem | Should reflect | The main cause of a quantitative and/or qualitative deficiency in the environment under investigation |
The negative wording of the research aim | ||||
5–2 | 80% | Research sub-problems | Should describe | The subsidiary causes of the main problem |
5–3 | 79% | Consequences of the Problem | Should describe | Subsidiary symptoms of the general illness of the examined environment |
6 | 79% | Research questions | Should rephrase | The research sub-problems in a question format |
The research objectives in a question format | ||||
7 | 63% | Research aims, goals and objectives | Should be | SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and timely) |
7–1 | 63% | General aim of the research | Should reflect | A target responding to the general research problem/question |
A potential alternative scenario that may enable the development of solutions | ||||
The research title with the same or different wording | ||||
7–2 | 57% | Procedural objectives of the research | Should articulate/represent | The sub-goals that compose the main research aim |
The stages of the research | ||||
The sections or chapters of the thesis | ||||
7–3 | 70% | Development objectives of the research | Should reflect | Targeted solutions to the sub-problems of the study |
Targeted possible cures/fixes for the subsidiary causes of the problem | ||||
8 | 83% | Research scope | Should cover | Thematic, geographic and temporal limits of the study |
9 | 87% | Research significance and contributions | Should highlight | The expected positive theoretical or practical impacts of the research or both |
10 | 95% | Preliminary review of literature | Should cover | A well-documented, structured, analysed and synthesized critical review of relevant research |
11 | 82% | Research methodology | Should explain | The methods, techniques and tools used to accomplish the research objectives in each stage of the study |
12 | 82% | Research structure and timeline | Should articulate/represent | The stages/phases of the research and their expected completion dates |
The main chapters of the research distributed along the completion timeline | ||||
13 | 77% | List of references | Should present | The references relevant to the research problem |
14 | General rule | The thesis proposal (using future tenses) | Should resemble | The general introduction of the final thesis (using past tenses) |
Source(s) : Prepared by the authors based on the above analysis and the results of expert inquiry
Abdellatif , M. ( 2015 ), The Simplifying-Integrating Approach to Deal with Contemporary Design, Planning and Urban Development Problems , Scientific Publication Center, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University , Dammam .
Abdellatif , M. and Abdellatif , R. ( 2005 ), Scientific Research Methods and Techniques in Architecture and Urban Planning , Unpublished Textbook for Graduate Students in Abdulrahman bin Faisal University , Dammam .
Abdulai , R.T. and Owusu-Ansah , A. ( 2014 ), “ Essential ingredients of a good research proposal for undergraduate and postgraduate students in the social sciences ”, SAGE Open , Vol. 4 No. 3 , pp. 1 - 15 .
Afful , J.B. ( 2008 ), “ Research proposal and thesis writing: narrative of a recently graduated researcher in applied linguistics ”, Nebula , Vol. 5 No. 4 , pp. 193 - 211 .
Axelrod , B. and Windell , J. ( 2012 ), Dissertation Solutions: A Concise Guide to Planning, Implementing, and Surviving the Dissertation Process , Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. , Plymouth .
Babbie , E. ( 2014 ), The Basics of Social Research , 6th ed. , Wadsworth Cengage Learning , Belmont, CA .
Balakumar , P. , Inamdar , M. and Jagadeesh , G. ( 2013 ), “ The critical steps for successful research: the research proposal and scientific writing ”, Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics , Vol. 4 No. 2 , pp. 130 - 138 .
Blaxter , L. , Hughes , C. and Tight , M. ( 2010 ), How to Research , Open University Press MaGraw-Hill Education , New York, NY .
Davies , W.M. ( 2011 ), Study Skills for International Postgraduate Students , Palgrave, MacMillan , Basingstoke .
Donohue , M. ( 2018 ), “ Research proposal toolkit: design tools for developing multi-stakeholder research proposals ”, available at: https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/files/neu:m044c6541 ( accessed 24 October 2019 ).
Doran , G.T. ( 1981 ), “ There's, a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives ”, Management Review , Vol. 70 No. 11 , pp. 35 - 36 .
Dorst , K. ( 2011 ), “ The core of “design thinking” and its application ”, Design Studies , Vol. 32 No. 6 , pp. 521 - 532 .
Dunleavy , P. ( 2003 ), Authoring a PhD: How to Plan, Draft, Write and Finish a Doctoral Thesis or Dissertation , Macmillan International Higher Education , Hampshire .
Eco , U. ( 2015 ), How to Write a Thesis , MIT Press, ProQuest Ebook Central , Cambridge .
Experts_Survey ( 2019 ), “ Opinion poll on definitions, attributes and equations of the successful thesis proposal ”, available at: https://www.questionpro.com/t/AOkM7ZdeXy ( accessed 01 November 2019 ).
Glatthorn , A.A. and Randy , L.J. ( 2018 ), Writing the Winning Thesis or Dissertation; a Step-by-step Guide , Corwin , Thousand Oaks, CA .
Goetz , S.J. , Shortle , J.S. and Bergstrom , J.C. ( 2005 ), Land Use Problems and Conflict: Causes, Consequences and Solutions , Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group , London .
Gonzalez , A.M. ( 2007 ), Shaping the Thesis and Dissertation: Case Studies of Writers across the Curriculum , Texas Christian University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing , Fort Worth, TX .
Grix , J. ( 2001 ), Demystifying Postgraduate Research from MA to PhD , University of Birmingram Press , Birmingham .
Groat , L. and Wang , D. ( 2013 ), Architectural Research Methods , Wiley & Sons, Inc. , Hoboken, NJ .
Hart , C. ( 1998 ), Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination , Sage Publications , London .
Hofstee , E. ( 2006 ), Constructing a Good Dissertation: A Practical Guide to Finishing a Master's, MBA or PhD on Schedule , EPE , Sandton .
Kamler , B. and Thomson , P. ( 2008 ), “ The failure of dissertation advice books: toward alternative' ”, Educational Researcher , Vol. 37 No. 8 , pp. 507 - 514 .
Kivunja , C. ( 2016 ), “ How to write an effective research proposal for higher degree research in higher education ”, International Journal of Higher Education , Vol. 5 No. 2 , pp. 163 - 172 .
Koopman , P. ( 1997 ), “ How to write an abstract ”, available at: http://users.ece.cmu.edu/∼koopman/essays/abstract.html ( accessed October 2019 ).
Kornuta , H.M. and Germaine , R.W. ( 2019 ), A Concise Guide to Writing a Thesis or Dissertation Educational Research and beyond , Routledge , New York, NY .
Lamanauskas , V. ( 2019 ), “ Scientific article preparation: title, abstract and keywords ”, Problems in Education in the 21st Century , Vol. 77 No. 4 , pp. 456 - 462 .
Leo , S. ( 2019 ), “ Pitfalls of tourism graduate students in presenting the ingredients of research proposals ”, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sports and Tourism Education , Vol. 24 , pp. 178 - 189 .
Mack , C. ( 2012 ), “ How to write a good scientific paper: title, abstract, and keywords ”, Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS , Vol. 11 No. 2 , pp. 1 - 5 .
Ostler , E. ( 1996 ), Guidelines for Writing Research Proposals, Reports, Theses, and Dissertations , The Educational Resources Information Center (Eric) , Washington, DC .
Paltridge , B. and Starfield , S. ( 2007 ), Thesis and Dissertation Writing in a Second Language: A Handbook for Supervisors , Routledge , London .
Pautasso , M. ( 2013 ), “ Ten simple rules for writing a literature review ”, PLoS Computational Biology , Vol. 9 No. 7 , pp. 1 - 4 .
Reddy , C.D. ( 2019 ), “ Thinking through a research proposal: a question approach ”, in 18th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies , Academic Conferences International Limited , Johannesburg , pp. 271 - 277 .
Salama , A.M. ( 2019 ), “ Methodological research in architecture and allied disciplines: philosophical positions, frames of reference, and spheres of inquiry ”, Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research , Vol. 13 No. 1 , pp. 8 - 24 .
Simpson , D.D. and Turner , L.W. ( 2004 ), “ Guide for preparing a thesis or dissertation ”, American Journal of Health Behavior , Vol. 28 No. 5 , pp. 477 - 478 .
Students_Survey ( 2020 ), “ Implication of the successful thesis proposal conception on the students' performance and output ”, available at: https://www.questionpro.com/t/AOkM7ZgieG ( accessed 02 February 2020 ).
Thomas , D. ( 2016 ), The PhD Writing Handbook , Palgrave, Macmillan Publisher Limited , New York, NY .
Walliman , N. ( 2017 ), Research Methods: The Basics , Routledge , New York, NY .
Zhou , A.A. ( 2004 ), Writing the Dissertation Proposal: A Comparative Case Study of Four Nonnative- and Two Native -English -speaking Doctoral Students of Education , University of Toronto, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing , Toronto .
The authors acknowledge the sincere assistance provided by the team of experts from several Architectural Schools worldwide to verify and improve the TP Conception. Appreciation is also extended to the post graduate students of the College of Architecture and Planning, IAU, who have positively responded to the students' opinion survey.
About the authors.
Mahmoud Abdellatif is a Professor of Urban and Regional Planning, College of Architecture and Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU), Dammam, Saudi Arabia. He received an MSc from Assuit University, Egypt in 1977 and another MSc from Iowa State University in 1981 and a PhD degree from Texas A&M University in 1985. He has taught and practiced Architecture and Urban Planning for more than 45 years in Egypt, United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. His main research focus is on research methods, strategic planning and design and development approaches. He is currently the adviser of IAU Vice President for Studies, Development and Community Services. His last book (published in Arabic) entitled The Simplifying-Integrating Approach to Contemporary Design, Planning and Urban Development articulates his own problem-solving approach. He is the principle editor of the Strategic Plan of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University 2018–2025.
Reham Abdellatif is an Assistant Professor in Architecture, College of Design, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU), Dammam, Saudi Arabia. She obtained an MSc degree from Assiut University in 2003 and a PhD degree from Newcastle University, UK, in 2012. She has taught and practiced Architecture and Interior Design for more than 22 years in Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Her main research focus is on Architectural Education and Curriculum Development, Analysing Design Learning Activities, Distant/Online Learning, Communication and Computation, VR and Information Technologies in Architecture. She ran the interior design curriculum development committee in Assiut University and in IAU.
All feedback is valuable.
Please share your general feedback
Contact Customer Support
Our systems are now restored following recent technical disruption, and we’re working hard to catch up on publishing. We apologise for the inconvenience caused. Find out more: https://www.cambridge.org/universitypress/about-us/news-and-blogs/cambridge-university-press-publishing-update-following-technical-disruption
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings .
Research in urban history: recent ph.d. theses on heritage and the city in britain.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 July 2018
Writing in Urban History in the spring of 1991, Peter Borsay considered how the gap between the ‘popular presentations of the urban past’ produced by the growing heritage industry and ‘the booming academic study of urban history’ might be bridged. Heritage, he argued, was ‘deeply bound up with the meanings and functions of towns’ and urban historians should play a crucial role within communities ‘engaged in a complex discourse with the past . . . that for many was fundamental to their livelihood and identity’. Borsay's concerns 27 years later continue to be mirrored in academic discussions surrounding heritage and materiality, echoing wider questions that surround the relevance of urban history beyond the academy. Recent conferences have also demonstrated the continued salience of Borsay's argument, considering the potential of the study of cities to shape approaches to their management through work with local communities, heritage partners, cultural institutions and professional groups. This emphasis on knowledge exchange and partnership has also attracted the support of funding bodies through collaborative doctoral awards that have sought to ‘increase opportunities for all researchers to develop their work in collaboration with public, private and third sector partners that increase the flow, value and impact of world-class arts and humanities research from academia to the UK's wider creative economy and beyond’. This has included the author's own work on the heritage of Middlesbrough's iron and steel industries, which has involved working collaboratively with local archives and heritage partners.
1 Borsay , P. , ‘ History or heritage: perceptions of the urban past: a review essay ’, Urban History , 18 ( 1991 ), 32 – 40 CrossRef Google Scholar .
2 Ibid ., 39.
3 For discussion of approaches to materiality and heritage in urban history, see Fennelly , K. , ‘ Materiality and the urban: recent theses in archaeology and material culture and their importance for the study of urban history ’, Urban History , 44 ( 2017 ), 564 –73 CrossRef Google Scholar .
4 ‘Urban History Group Conference Programme 2016’, www2.le.ac.uk/departments/urbanhistory/uhg/past-conferences/2016/uhg-booklet-2016 accessed 2 Dec. 2017; European Association of Urban History Conference 2016: Session Papers, https://eauh2016.net/programme/sessions/ accessed 4 Dec. 2017.
5 ‘Knowledge Exchange and Partnerships’ AHRC, www.ahrc.ac.uk/innovation/knowledgeexchange/ accessed 21 Nov. 2017.
6 T. Warwick, ‘Middlesbrough's steel magnates: business, culture and participation’, University of Huddersfield Ph.D. thesis, 2016.
7 S. O'Connor, ‘Architecture, power and ritual in Scottish town halls, 1833–1973’, University of Bath Ph.D. thesis, 2016.
8 Ibid ., 2.
9 Ibid ., 141.
10 Ibid ., 143–4.
11 Ibid ., 164–5.
12 D. Georgiou, ‘From the fringe of London to the heart of fairyland: suburban community leisure, voluntary action and identities in the Ilford Carnival, 1905–1914’, Queen Mary University of London Ph.D. thesis, 2016.
13 Ibid ., 236.
14 Ibid ., 237.
15 Ibid ., 253.
16 For example, see the AHRC-supported ‘The redress of the past: historical pageants in Britain, 1905–2016’ project which has produced a number of articles, exhibitions and digital resources offering insights into ‘the role of heritage in leisure activities, the interaction between local, national and imperial identities, and the changing character of community life in twentieth and early twenty-first century Britain’: www.historicalpageants.ac.uk/about/ www.historicalpageants.ac.uk/about/ accessed 12 Dec. 2017.
17 Colenutt , B. , Shabetiz , S. Coady and Ward , S.V. , ‘ New towns heritage research network ’, Planning Perspectives , 32 ( 2017 ), 281 –3 CrossRef Google Scholar . The network is timely given the changes to the new town urban landscape posed by debates around refurbishment, renewal and threat of demolition coupled with a number of significant anniversaries.
18 L. Piko, ‘Mirroring England? Milton Keynes, decline and the English landscape’, University of Melbourne Ph.D. thesis, 2017.
19 Ibid ., 119–20.
20 Ibid ., 138–9.
21 Ibid ., 296.
22 D. Matless, Landscape and Englishness (London, 1998).
23 Piko, ‘Mirroring England?’, 297–300.
24 McClelland , A. , ‘ A “ghastly interregnum”: the struggle for architectural heritage conservation in Belfast before 1972 ’, Urban History , 45 ( 2018 ), 150 –72 CrossRef Google Scholar .
25 A. McClelland, ‘Contesting destruction, constructing heritage: the social construction of architectural heritage values in Belfast, circa 1960–1989’, University of Ulster Ph.D. thesis, 2014.
26 Ibid ., 32–3, 152–4.
27 Ibid ., ch. 5, 155–88.
28 Ibid ., 244–5.
29 B. Rosa, ‘Beneath the arches: re-appropriating the spaces of infrastructure in Manchester’, University of Manchester Ph.D. thesis, 2013.
30 Ibid ., 147.
31 Ibid ., 149.
32 Ibid ., 152.
33 Ibid ., 161–3.
34 Ibid ., 168.
35 S.A. Murray, ‘Bankside Power Station: planning, politics and pollution’, University of Leicester Ph.D. thesis, 2014.
36 Ibid ., 32, 248.
37 Ibid ., 248–54.
38 Ibid ., 257.
39 Ibid ., 272–8.
40 Ibid ., 292
41 H.V. Connelly, ‘Ground-breaking: community heritage on Glasgow's allotments’, University of Glasgow Ph.D. thesis, 2017.
42 For more information on The Heritage Consortium, visit http://www.heritageconsortium.ac.uk/ accessed 12 Dec. 2017.
View all Google Scholar citations for this article.
To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle .
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox .
To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive .
- No HTML tags allowed - Web page URLs will display as text only - Lines and paragraphs break automatically - Attachments, images or tables are not permitted
Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.
Conflicting interests.
Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Eugene McCann
Benigno C. Balgos
Implosion/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, ed. Neil Brenner
Kanishka Goonewardena
Margit Mayer
Neil Brenner
Byron Miller
Thomas Smith
Society and Space
Ross E Adams
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Solomon J Benjamin
Public Culture
Vyjayanthi Rao
Christian Schmid , Neil Brenner
Radical Philosophy
David Cunningham
Habtamu Wondimu
Sharon Meagher
Published in S. Veca (ed.) The Many Faces of Sustainability, Milan: Feltrinelli, 2015, pp. 329 -358.
Allen Scott
michael goldman , Eric Sheppard , Helga Leitner
Kate Derickson
Cyntia López
Karl W Butzer
Open Philosophy
Sanna Lehtinen
Brieuc Bisson
Adriana Allen
Berkeley Planning Journal
Mireia Belil
Pieter Cardoen
David Wachsmuth
Martín Arboleda
Michael Storper , Allen Scott
Aditya Mohanty
Arghya Saha
Urban Studies
Austin Zeiderman
Ucla urban planning theses and projects.
For research from students in UCLA's Urban Planning Program, see the below instructions for searching the Library Catalog . Some of the projects are available full-text online, others are deposited in the SRLF.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
The urban has become a keyword of early twenty-first-century economic, political, and cultural discourse. ... This is t he core thesis of D iener et al. 20 01. rura l, wilderness, or otherwise) as ...
Anderson, Raven. "Policy Levers and Urban Growth: A Study o Rapid Urbanization and its Manaement in Ulaanbaatar, Monolia." (Advisor: Michael Hooper) arrera, Mariana. "Añelo, Arentina, and the Urban hallenes o a Shale oom Town." (Advisor: Diane Davis) Hwan, hristine. "Unluin Detroit's Stained-Glass Mosaic: Parochial Schools as
The following are doctoral theses completed by individual students in the Department of Urban and Regional Planning at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Please see Find Dissertations for more details about locating doctoral theses in general. Check the online catalog for doctoral theses not listed here.. Most call numbers and locations are given after each entry; if not available ...
I dedicate this thesis to my grandmother, Katherine (Mac) Anderson. She was the strongest and kindest woman I knew, and I am proud to carry on her legacy. There are so many people and organizations who helped make my PhD research possible. First and foremost, thank you to the entire EvoEco lab, past and present. This incredible research
Delhi without borders: A critique of everyday life under extended urbanisation. Doctoral Thesis, Zurich, ETH Zurich, 2022. Concomitant with India's spectacular economic growth following the 1990s liberalisation reforms, the Indian countryside, too, has witnessed exceedingly profound transformations. Departing at this spatio-historical ...
PhD thesis, University of Leeds. Abstract. This thesis investigates how rapid urbanisation changed the daily life of residents on the periphery of Chongqing, Southwest China. It examines how the vision of urban modernity promoted by the local state compares to the reality of urbanisation on the edge of the city. It considers how informal ...
Green Mind Gray Yard: Micro Scale Assessment of Ecosystem Services, Erin Jolene Kirkpatrick (Thesis) PDF. The Impacts of Urban Renewal: The Residents' Experiences in Qianmen, Beijing, China, Yongxia Kou (Dissertation) PDF. The Dynamics of Creating Strong Democracy in Portland, Oregon : 1974 to 2013, Paul Roland Leistner (Dissertation)
The Political Economy of Urbanization and Development in sub-Saharan Africa (PhD Thesis) Sean Fox The first provides an interdisciplinary, historical perspective on the dynamics of urbanisation and urban growth in the region from the colonial era to the present day.
This thesis consists of material all of which I authored or co-authored: see Statement of Contributions included in the thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public.
Towards a narratology of planning - stories of a South African gold mining town. Tesner-Smith, Desirée (University of Pretoria, 2019) The study had a dual objective, namely 1) to add to the body of knowledge of South African planning stories and 2) to consider the possibility of a narratology of planning.
Urbanization is one of the biggest social transformations of modern time, driving and driven by multiple social, economic, and environmental processes. The impacts of urbanization on the environment are profound, multifaceted and are manifested at the local, regional, and global scale. This article reviews recent advances in conceptual and empirical knowledge linking urbanization and the ...
PhD thesis, University of Sheffield. Abstract. Abstract Sustainable urbanisation (SU) has become a major preoccupation for many cities worldwide in light of projections that the urban population will keep increasing by 2050 to 68 percent of the world's total population as per UNDESA's statistics in 2014. ... PhD Thesis - SUSTAINABLE ...
Abstract. This PhD dissertation examines the impact of rapid urbanization on land use changes and farmers livelihood in Ethiopia, to better understand urban development in developing countries and ...
Revisiting "Slums", Revealing Responses. Urban Upgrading in Tenant Dominated Inner-City Settlements of Addis Ababa. (Elias Yitbarek Alemayehu. 2008. PhD. Thesis to be finalized March 2008.) Problem: About 50% of the population of Addis, most of whom are low-income, live in 'non-planned' and physically deteriorated areas of the inner city.
This thesis is composed of four essays on urban and spatial economics. The first two papers are empirical studies evaluating the impact of public policies in England - one looking at transport infrastructure and the other at flood management. The last two papers leverage satellite imagery to investigate the effects of floods and flood risk on urbanisation in developing countries.
For the PhD in City & Regional Planning, students must complete various program requirements, including courses in planning and urban theory; research methods courses; and preparation and completion of two fields of specialization. They must also successfully complete an oral qualifying examination, which allows them to advance to candidacy and ...
Mahmoud Abdellatif is a Professor of Urban and Regional Planning, College of Architecture and Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU), Dammam, Saudi Arabia. He received an MSc from Assuit University, Egypt in 1977 and another MSc from Iowa State University in 1981 and a PhD degree from Texas A&M University in 1985.
Writing in Urban History in the spring of 1991, Peter Borsay considered how the gap between the 'popular presentations of the urban past' produced by the growing heritage industry and 'the booming academic study of urban history' might be bridged. Heritage, he argued, was 'deeply bound up with the meanings and functions of towns' and urban historians should play a crucial role ...
Urban Planning and Everyday Urbanisation: A Case Study on Bahir Dar, Ethiopia Appelhans, Nadine Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Dissertation / phd thesis Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: transcript Verlag Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Appelhans, N. (2017).
9. Urbanization contains two dialectically intertwined moments—concentration and extension.20 Urban theory has long conceived urbanization primarily in terms of agglomeration — the dense concentration of population, infrastructure, and investment at certain locations on a broader, less densely settled territorial plane.
PhD RESEARCH PROPOSAL (ENVIRONMENT) Topic Sustainable urbanization in Ghana: The role of integrated land use planning March 2020 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28734.23368
Thesis: Ph. D. in Urban and Regional Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, 2016. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references. This dissertation is a collection of three essays on urbanization and migration. The first essay is a treatment on the urbanization theory.
To locate a UCLA U.P. dissertation: Do an Any Field search for dissertations urban planning ucla. To see the most recent dissertations, Sort by Date — newest. You can also browse dissertations by call number. From the Browse search screen, copy and paste the following call number LD791.9 U7; select Call Number from the drop-down menu.