- PRO Courses Guides New Tech Help Pro Expert Videos About wikiHow Pro Upgrade Sign In
- EDIT Edit this Article
- EXPLORE Tech Help Pro About Us Random Article Quizzes Request a New Article Community Dashboard This Or That Game Happiness Hub Popular Categories Arts and Entertainment Artwork Books Movies Computers and Electronics Computers Phone Skills Technology Hacks Health Men's Health Mental Health Women's Health Relationships Dating Love Relationship Issues Hobbies and Crafts Crafts Drawing Games Education & Communication Communication Skills Personal Development Studying Personal Care and Style Fashion Hair Care Personal Hygiene Youth Personal Care School Stuff Dating All Categories Arts and Entertainment Finance and Business Home and Garden Relationship Quizzes Cars & Other Vehicles Food and Entertaining Personal Care and Style Sports and Fitness Computers and Electronics Health Pets and Animals Travel Education & Communication Hobbies and Crafts Philosophy and Religion Work World Family Life Holidays and Traditions Relationships Youth
- Browse Articles
- Learn Something New
- Quizzes Hot
- Happiness Hub
- This Or That Game
- Train Your Brain
- Explore More
- Support wikiHow
- About wikiHow
- Log in / Sign up
- Education and Communications
- Critical Reviews
How to Write an Article Review (With Examples)
Last Updated: August 26, 2024 Fact Checked
Preparing to Write Your Review
Writing the article review, sample article reviews, expert q&a.
This article was co-authored by Jake Adams . Jake Adams is an academic tutor and the owner of Simplifi EDU, a Santa Monica, California based online tutoring business offering learning resources and online tutors for academic subjects K-College, SAT & ACT prep, and college admissions applications. With over 14 years of professional tutoring experience, Jake is dedicated to providing his clients the very best online tutoring experience and access to a network of excellent undergraduate and graduate-level tutors from top colleges all over the nation. Jake holds a BS in International Business and Marketing from Pepperdine University. There are 12 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page. This article has been fact-checked, ensuring the accuracy of any cited facts and confirming the authority of its sources. This article has been viewed 3,135,705 times.
An article review is both a summary and an evaluation of another writer's article. Teachers often assign article reviews to introduce students to the work of experts in the field. Experts also are often asked to review the work of other professionals. Understanding the main points and arguments of the article is essential for an accurate summation. Logical evaluation of the article's main theme, supporting arguments, and implications for further research is an important element of a review . Here are a few guidelines for writing an article review.
Education specialist Alexander Peterman recommends: "In the case of a review, your objective should be to reflect on the effectiveness of what has already been written, rather than writing to inform your audience about a subject."
Article Review 101
- Read the article very closely, and then take time to reflect on your evaluation. Consider whether the article effectively achieves what it set out to.
- Write out a full article review by completing your intro, summary, evaluation, and conclusion. Don't forget to add a title, too!
- Proofread your review for mistakes (like grammar and usage), while also cutting down on needless information.
- Article reviews present more than just an opinion. You will engage with the text to create a response to the scholarly writer's ideas. You will respond to and use ideas, theories, and research from your studies. Your critique of the article will be based on proof and your own thoughtful reasoning.
- An article review only responds to the author's research. It typically does not provide any new research. However, if you are correcting misleading or otherwise incorrect points, some new data may be presented.
- An article review both summarizes and evaluates the article.
- Summarize the article. Focus on the important points, claims, and information.
- Discuss the positive aspects of the article. Think about what the author does well, good points she makes, and insightful observations.
- Identify contradictions, gaps, and inconsistencies in the text. Determine if there is enough data or research included to support the author's claims. Find any unanswered questions left in the article.
- Make note of words or issues you don't understand and questions you have.
- Look up terms or concepts you are unfamiliar with, so you can fully understand the article. Read about concepts in-depth to make sure you understand their full context.
- Pay careful attention to the meaning of the article. Make sure you fully understand the article. The only way to write a good article review is to understand the article.
- With either method, make an outline of the main points made in the article and the supporting research or arguments. It is strictly a restatement of the main points of the article and does not include your opinions.
- After putting the article in your own words, decide which parts of the article you want to discuss in your review. You can focus on the theoretical approach, the content, the presentation or interpretation of evidence, or the style. You will always discuss the main issues of the article, but you can sometimes also focus on certain aspects. This comes in handy if you want to focus the review towards the content of a course.
- Review the summary outline to eliminate unnecessary items. Erase or cross out the less important arguments or supplemental information. Your revised summary can serve as the basis for the summary you provide at the beginning of your review.
- What does the article set out to do?
- What is the theoretical framework or assumptions?
- Are the central concepts clearly defined?
- How adequate is the evidence?
- How does the article fit into the literature and field?
- Does it advance the knowledge of the subject?
- How clear is the author's writing? Don't: include superficial opinions or your personal reaction. Do: pay attention to your biases, so you can overcome them.
- For example, in MLA , a citation may look like: Duvall, John N. "The (Super)Marketplace of Images: Television as Unmediated Mediation in DeLillo's White Noise ." Arizona Quarterly 50.3 (1994): 127-53. Print. [9] X Trustworthy Source Purdue Online Writing Lab Trusted resource for writing and citation guidelines Go to source
- For example: The article, "Condom use will increase the spread of AIDS," was written by Anthony Zimmerman, a Catholic priest.
- Your introduction should only be 10-25% of your review.
- End the introduction with your thesis. Your thesis should address the above issues. For example: Although the author has some good points, his article is biased and contains some misinterpretation of data from others’ analysis of the effectiveness of the condom.
- Use direct quotes from the author sparingly.
- Review the summary you have written. Read over your summary many times to ensure that your words are an accurate description of the author's article.
- Support your critique with evidence from the article or other texts.
- The summary portion is very important for your critique. You must make the author's argument clear in the summary section for your evaluation to make sense.
- Remember, this is not where you say if you liked the article or not. You are assessing the significance and relevance of the article.
- Use a topic sentence and supportive arguments for each opinion. For example, you might address a particular strength in the first sentence of the opinion section, followed by several sentences elaborating on the significance of the point.
- This should only be about 10% of your overall essay.
- For example: This critical review has evaluated the article "Condom use will increase the spread of AIDS" by Anthony Zimmerman. The arguments in the article show the presence of bias, prejudice, argumentative writing without supporting details, and misinformation. These points weaken the author’s arguments and reduce his credibility.
- Make sure you have identified and discussed the 3-4 key issues in the article.
You Might Also Like
- ↑ https://libguides.cmich.edu/writinghelp/articlereview
- ↑ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548566/
- ↑ Jake Adams. Academic Tutor & Test Prep Specialist. Expert Interview. 24 July 2020.
- ↑ https://guides.library.queensu.ca/introduction-research/writing/critical
- ↑ https://www.iup.edu/writingcenter/writing-resources/organization-and-structure/creating-an-outline.html
- ↑ https://writing.umn.edu/sws/assets/pdf/quicktips/titles.pdf
- ↑ https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_works_cited_periodicals.html
- ↑ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548565/
- ↑ https://writingcenter.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/593/2014/06/How_to_Summarize_a_Research_Article1.pdf
- ↑ https://www.uis.edu/learning-hub/writing-resources/handouts/learning-hub/how-to-review-a-journal-article
- ↑ https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/editing-and-proofreading/
About This Article
If you have to write an article review, read through the original article closely, taking notes and highlighting important sections as you read. Next, rewrite the article in your own words, either in a long paragraph or as an outline. Open your article review by citing the article, then write an introduction which states the article’s thesis. Next, summarize the article, followed by your opinion about whether the article was clear, thorough, and useful. Finish with a paragraph that summarizes the main points of the article and your opinions. To learn more about what to include in your personal critique of the article, keep reading the article! Did this summary help you? Yes No
- Send fan mail to authors
Reader Success Stories
Prince Asiedu-Gyan
Apr 22, 2022
Did this article help you?
Sammy James
Sep 12, 2017
Juabin Matey
Aug 30, 2017
Vanita Meghrajani
Jul 21, 2016
Nov 27, 2018
Featured Articles
Trending Articles
Watch Articles
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Policy
- Do Not Sell or Share My Info
- Not Selling Info
wikiHow Tech Help Pro:
Develop the tech skills you need for work and life
How to Write an Article Review: Template & Examples
An article review is an academic assignment that invites you to study a piece of academic research closely. Then, you should present its summary and critically evaluate it using the knowledge you’ve gained in class and during your independent study. If you get such a task at college or university, you shouldn’t confuse it with a response paper, which is a distinct assignment with other purposes (we’ll talk about it in detail below).
In this article, prepared by Custom-Writing experts, you’ll find:
- the intricacies of article review writing;
- the difference between an article review and similar assignments;
- a step-by-step algorithm for review composition;
- a couple of samples to guide you throughout the writing process.
So, if you wish to study our article review example and discover helpful writing tips, keep reading.
❓ What Is an Article Review?
- ✍️ Writing Steps
📑 Article Review Format
🔗 references.
An article review is an academic paper that summarizes and critically evaluates the information presented in your selected article.
The first thing you should note when approaching the task of an article review is that not every article is suitable for this assignment. Let’s have a look at the variety of articles to understand what you can choose from.
Popular Vs. Scholarly Articles
In most cases, you’ll be required to review a scholarly, peer-reviewed article – one composed in compliance with rigorous academic standards. Yet, the Web is also full of popular articles that don’t present original scientific value and shouldn’t be selected for a review.
Not sure how to distinguish these two types? Here is a comparative table to help you out.
🗞️ Popular articles are: | 🎓 Scholarly articles are: |
---|---|
Written by a professional or non-professional author. | Written by someone with academic credentials. |
Meant for the general audience. | Published for the peer academic community. |
Featuring reader-friendly, simple language. | Containing professional jargon and vocabulary. |
Illustrated by simple and engaging visuals. | Illustrated by tables and graphs. |
Structured in a simple way. | Structured according to a scholarly publication’s standards. |
Checked by the magazine’s editorial staff only. | Thoroughly reviewed by peer researchers. |
Featuring no or scarce references. | Featuring a full list of references. |
Article Review vs. Response Paper
Now, let’s consider the difference between an article review and a response paper:
- If you’re assigned to critique a scholarly article , you will need to compose an article review .
- If your subject of analysis is a popular article , you can respond to it with a well-crafted response paper .
The reason for such distinctions is the quality and structure of these two article types. Peer-reviewed, scholarly articles have clear-cut quality criteria, allowing you to conduct and present a structured assessment of the assigned material. Popular magazines have loose or non-existent quality criteria and don’t offer an opportunity for structured evaluation. So, they are only fit for a subjective response, in which you can summarize your reactions and emotions related to the reading material.
All in all, you can structure your response assignments as outlined in the tips below.
✔️ | Both a reaction paper and an article review will start with a content summary. |
✔️ | For scholarly material, you will present a structured review after the summary. |
✔️ | For popular magazine content, you will write a response that sums up your emotions, thoughts, and reactions that the material aroused. |
✍️ How to Write an Article Review: Step by Step
Here is a tried and tested algorithm for article review writing from our experts. We’ll consider only the critical review variety of this academic assignment. So, let’s get down to the stages you need to cover to get a stellar review.
Read the Article
As with any reviews, reports, and critiques, you must first familiarize yourself with the assigned material. It’s impossible to review something you haven’t read, so set some time for close, careful reading of the article to identify:
- The author’s main points and message.
- The arguments they use to prove their points.
- The methodology they use to approach the subject.
In terms of research type, your article will usually belong to one of three types explained below.
This type of research is the most common and highly valued in the scholarly community. It uses primary data collected by the author specifically for this article and offers original findings and insights into the discussed research area. | |
This research type examines a particular event, phenomenon, or object closely by considering its environment, details, and context. It’s a close-up of the research object that can be achieved via different observation and data collection techniques. | |
These articles address new research procedures or methods for testing hypotheses in a specific area of research. |
Summarize the Article
Now that you’ve read the text and have a general impression of the content, it’s time to summarize it for your readers. Look into the article’s text closely to determine:
- The thesis statement, or general message of the author.
- Research question, purpose, and context of research.
- Supporting points for the author’s assumptions and claims.
- Major findings and supporting evidence.
As you study the article thoroughly, make notes on the margins or write these elements out on a sheet of paper. You can also apply a different technique: read the text section by section and formulate its gist in one phrase or sentence. Once you’re done, you’ll have a summary skeleton in front of you.
Evaluate the Article
The next step of review is content evaluation. Keep in mind that various research types will require a different set of review questions. Here is a complete list of evaluation points you can include.
cover the article’s purpose comprehensively? | |
in data presentation? | |
Write the Text
After completing the critical review stage, it’s time to compose your article review.
The format of this assignment is standard – you will have an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. The introduction should present your article and summarize its content. The body will contain a structured review according to all four dimensions covered in the previous section. The concluding part will typically recap all the main points you’ve identified during your assessment.
It is essential to note that an article review is, first of all, an academic assignment. Therefore, it should follow all rules and conventions of academic composition, such as:
- No contractions . Don’t use short forms, such as “don’t,” “can’t,” “I’ll,” etc. in academic writing. You need to spell out all those words.
- Formal language and style . Avoid conversational phrasing and words that you would naturally use in blog posts or informal communication. For example, don’t use words like “pretty,” “kind of,” and “like.”
- Third-person narrative . Academic reviews should be written from the third-person point of view, avoiding statements like “I think,” “in my opinion,” and so on.
- No conversational forms . You shouldn’t turn to your readers directly in the text by addressing them with the pronoun “you.” It’s vital to keep the narrative neutral and impersonal.
- Proper abbreviation use . Consult the list of correct abbreviations, like “e.g.” or “i.e.,” for use in your academic writing. If you use informal abbreviations like “FYA” or “f.i.,” your professor will reduce the grade.
- Complete sentences . Make sure your sentences contain the subject and the predicate; avoid shortened or sketch-form phrases suitable for a draft only.
- No conjunctions at the beginning of a sentence . Remember the FANBOYS rule – don’t start a sentence with words like “and” or “but.” They often seem the right way to build a coherent narrative, but academic writing rules disfavor such usage.
- No abbreviations or figures at the beginning of a sentence . Never start a sentence with a number — spell it out if you need to use it anyway. Besides, sentences should never begin with abbreviations like “e.g.”
Finally, a vital rule for an article review is properly formatting the citations. We’ll discuss the correct use of citation styles in the following section.
When composing an article review, keep these points in mind:
- Start with a full reference to the reviewed article so the reader can locate it quickly.
- Ensure correct formatting of in-text references.
- Provide a complete list of used external sources on the last page of the review – your bibliographical entries.
You’ll need to understand the rules of your chosen citation style to meet all these requirements. Below, we’ll discuss the two most common referencing styles – APA and MLA.
Article Review in APA
When you need to compose an article review in the APA format , here is the general bibliographical entry format you should use for journal articles on your reference page:
- Author’s last name, First initial. Middle initial. (Year of Publication). Name of the article. Name of the Journal, volume (number), pp. #-#. https://doi.org/xx.xxx/yyyy
Horigian, V. E., Schmidt, R. D., & Feaster, D. J. (2021). Loneliness, mental health, and substance use among US young adults during COVID-19. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 53 (1), pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2020.1836435
Your in-text citations should follow the author-date format like this:
- If you paraphrase the source and mention the author in the text: According to Horigian et al. (2021), young adults experienced increased levels of loneliness, depression, and anxiety during the pandemic.
- If you paraphrase the source and don’t mention the author in the text: Young adults experienced increased levels of loneliness, depression, and anxiety during the pandemic (Horigian et al., 2021).
- If you quote the source: As Horigian et al. (2021) point out, there were “elevated levels of loneliness, depression, anxiety, alcohol use, and drug use among young adults during COVID-19” (p. 6).
Note that your in-text citations should include “et al.,” as in the examples above, if your article has 3 or more authors. If you have one or two authors, your in-text citations would look like this:
- One author: “According to Smith (2020), depression is…” or “Depression is … (Smith, 2020).”
- Two authors: “According to Smith and Brown (2020), anxiety means…” or “Anxiety means (Smith & Brown, 2020).”
Finally, in case you have to review a book or a website article, here are the general formats for citing these source types on your APA reference list.
Author’s last name, First initial. Middle initial. (Year). Publisher. | |
Author’s last name, First initial. Middle initial. (Year). . Name of Website. URL. |
Article Review in MLA
If your assignment requires MLA-format referencing, here’s the general format you should use for citing journal articles on your Works Cited page:
- Author’s last name, First name. “Title of an Article.” Title of the Journal , vol. #, no. #, year, pp. #-#.
Horigian, Viviana E., et al. “Loneliness, Mental Health, and Substance Use Among US Young Adults During COVID-19.” Journal of Psychoactive Drugs , vol. 53, no. 1, 2021, pp. 1-9.
In-text citations in the MLA format follow the author-page citation format and look like this:
- According to Horigian et al., young adults experienced increased levels of loneliness, depression, and anxiety during the pandemic (6).
- Young adults experienced increased levels of loneliness, depression, and anxiety during the pandemic (Horigian et al. 6).
Like in APA, the abbreviation “et al.” is only needed in MLA if your article has 3 or more authors.
If you need to cite a book or a website page, here are the general MLA formats for these types of sources.
Author’s last name, First name. Publisher, Year. | |
Author’s last name, First name. “Webpage Title.” , Date, URL. Accessed Day Month Year. |
✅ Article Review Template
Here is a handy, universal article review template to help you move on with any review assignment. We’ve tried to make it as generic as possible to guide you in the academic process.
Frequently, assignment instructions will ask you to include a full citation of your chosen text at the top of the first page of your article review. | |
In the introduction, you should summarize the background information and purpose of the research under review. In addition, consider explaining why you chose it for your assignment. | |
Next, summarize the article. If you review the original research, consider including the following points: If you review a or a book, include the following in your summary: This section should be no more than a third of your total article review. | |
Then, you should critically evaluate the article. Consider answering these questions: | |
In the , share your reasoned opinion on the reviewed piece. Was it worth reading? Did you learn any lessons from it? Would you recommend it to someone else, and why? | |
In the end, add a separate page with bibliographic citations of your reviewed article and any other sources used in your paper. |
📝 Article Review Examples
The theory is good, but practice is even better. Thus, we’ve created three brief examples to show you how to write an article review. You can study the full-text samples by following the links.
📃 Men, Women, & Money
This article review examines a famous piece, “Men, Women & Money – How the Sexes Differ with Their Finances,” published by Amy Livingston in 2020. The author of this article claims that men generally spend more money than women. She makes this conclusion from a close analysis of gender-specific expenditures across five main categories: food, clothing, cars, entertainment, and general spending patterns. Livingston also looks at men’s approach to saving to argue that counter to the common perception of women’s light-hearted attitude to money, men are those who spend more on average.
📃 When and Why Nationalism Beats Globalism
This is a review of Jonathan Heidt’s 2016 article titled “When and Why Nationalism Beats Globalism,” written as an advocacy of right-wing populism rising in many Western states. The author illustrates the case with the election of Donald Trump as the US President and the rise of right-wing rhetoric in many Western countries. These examples show how nationalist sentiment represents a reaction to global immigration and a failure of globalization.
📃 Sleep Deprivation
This is a review of the American Heart Association’s article titled “The Dangers of Sleep Deprivation.” It discusses how the national organization concerned with the American population’s cardiovascular health links the lack of high-quality sleep to far-reaching health consequences. The organization’s experts reveal how a consistent lack of sleep leads to Alzheimer’s disease development, obesity, type 2 diabetes, etc.
✏️ Article Review FAQ
A high-quality article review should summarize the assigned article’s content and offer data-backed reactions and evaluations of its quality in terms of the article’s purpose, methodology, and data used to argue the main points. It should be detailed, comprehensive, objective, and evidence-based.
The purpose of writing a review is to allow students to reflect on research quality and showcase their critical thinking and evaluation skills. Students should exhibit their mastery of close reading of research publications and their unbiased assessment.
The content of your article review will be the same in any format, with the only difference in the assignment’s formatting before submission. Ensure you have a separate title page made according to APA standards and cite sources using the parenthetical author-date referencing format.
You need to take a closer look at various dimensions of an assigned article to compose a valuable review. Study the author’s object of analysis, the purpose of their research, the chosen method, data, and findings. Evaluate all these dimensions critically to see whether the author has achieved the initial goals. Finally, offer improvement recommendations to add a critique aspect to your paper.
- Scientific Article Review: Duke University
- Book and Article Reviews: William & Mary, Writing Resources Center
- Sample Format for Reviewing a Journal Article: Boonshoft School of Medicine
- Research Paper Review – Structure and Format Guidelines: New Jersey Institute of Technology
- Article Review: University of Waterloo
- Writing Help: The Article Review: Central Michigan University Libraries
- Share to Facebook
- Share to LinkedIn
- Share to email
High school and college students often face challenges when crafting a compare-and-contrast essay. A well-written paper of this kind needs to be structured appropriately to earn you good grades. Knowing how to organize your ideas allows you to present your ideas in a coherent and logical manner This article by...
If you’re a student, you’ve heard about a formal essay: a factual, research-based paper written in 3rd person. Most students have to produce dozens of them during their educational career. Writing a formal essay may not be the easiest task. But fear not: our custom-writing team is here to guide...
Narrative essays are unlike anything you wrote throughout your academic career. Instead of writing a formal paper, you need to tell a story. Familiar elements such as evidence and arguments are replaced with exposition and character development. The importance of writing an outline for an essay like this is hard...
A précis is a brief synopsis of a written piece. It is used to summarize and analyze a text’s main points. If you need to write a précis for a research paper or the AP Lang exam, you’ve come to the right place. In this comprehensive guide by Custom-Writing.org, you’ll...
A synthesis essay requires you to work with multiple sources. You combine the information gathered from them to present a well-rounded argument on a topic. Are you looking for the ultimate guide on synthesis essay writing? You’ve come to the right place! In this guide by our custom writing team,...
Do you know how to make your essay stand out? One of the easiest ways is to start your introduction with a catchy hook. A hook is a phrase or a sentence that helps to grab the reader’s attention. After reading this article by Custom-Writing.org, you will be able to...
A critical analysis essay is an academic paper that requires a thorough examination of theoretical concepts and ideas. It includes a comparison of facts, differentiation between evidence and argument, and identification of biases. Crafting a good paper can be a daunting experience, but it will be much easier if you...
Critical thinking is the process of evaluating and analyzing information. People who use it in everyday life are open to different opinions. They rely on reason and logic when making conclusions about certain issues. A critical thinking essay shows how your thoughts change as you research your topic. This type...
Process analysis is an explanation of how something works or happens. Want to know more? Read the following article prepared by our custom writing specialists and learn about: So, let’s start digging deeper into this topic! ♻️ What Is Process Analysis? A process analysis describes and explains the succession of...
A visual analysis essay is an academic paper type that history and art students often deal with. It consists of a detailed description of an image or object. It can also include an interpretation or an argument that is supported by visual evidence. In this article, our custom writing experts...
Want to know how to write a reflection paper for college or school? To do that, you need to connect your personal experiences with theoretical knowledge. Usually, students are asked to reflect on a documentary, a text, or their experience. Sometimes one needs to write a paper about a lesson...
A character analysis is an examination of the personalities and actions of protagonists and antagonists that make up a story. It discusses their role in the story, evaluates their traits, and looks at their conflicts and experiences. You might need to write this assignment in school or college. Like any...
How to Write an Article Review: Tips and Examples
Did you know that article reviews are not just academic exercises but also a valuable skill in today's information age? In a world inundated with content, being able to dissect and evaluate articles critically can help you separate the wheat from the chaff. Whether you're a student aiming to excel in your coursework or a professional looking to stay well-informed, mastering the art of writing article reviews is an invaluable skill.
Short Description
In this article, our research paper writing service experts will start by unraveling the concept of article reviews and discussing the various types. You'll also gain insights into the art of formatting your review effectively. To ensure you're well-prepared, we'll take you through the pre-writing process, offering tips on setting the stage for your review. But it doesn't stop there. You'll find a practical example of an article review to help you grasp the concepts in action. To complete your journey, we'll guide you through the post-writing process, equipping you with essential proofreading techniques to ensure your work shines with clarity and precision!
What Is an Article Review: Grasping the Concept
A review article is a type of professional paper writing that demands a high level of in-depth analysis and a well-structured presentation of arguments. It is a critical, constructive evaluation of literature in a particular field through summary, classification, analysis, and comparison.
If you write a scientific review, you have to use database searches to portray the research. Your primary goal is to summarize everything and present a clear understanding of the topic you've been working on.
Writing Involves:
- Summarization, classification, analysis, critiques, and comparison.
- The analysis, evaluation, and comparison require the use of theories, ideas, and research relevant to the subject area of the article.
- It is also worth nothing if a review does not introduce new information, but instead presents a response to another writer's work.
- Check out other samples to gain a better understanding of how to review the article.
Types of Review
When it comes to article reviews, there's more than one way to approach the task. Understanding the various types of reviews is like having a versatile toolkit at your disposal. In this section, we'll walk you through the different dimensions of review types, each offering a unique perspective and purpose. Whether you're dissecting a scholarly article, critiquing a piece of literature, or evaluating a product, you'll discover the diverse landscape of article reviews and how to navigate it effectively.
Journal Article Review
Just like other types of reviews, a journal article review assesses the merits and shortcomings of a published work. To illustrate, consider a review of an academic paper on climate change, where the writer meticulously analyzes and interprets the article's significance within the context of environmental science.
Research Article Review
Distinguished by its focus on research methodologies, a research article review scrutinizes the techniques used in a study and evaluates them in light of the subsequent analysis and critique. For instance, when reviewing a research article on the effects of a new drug, the reviewer would delve into the methods employed to gather data and assess their reliability.
Science Article Review
In the realm of scientific literature, a science article review encompasses a wide array of subjects. Scientific publications often provide extensive background information, which can be instrumental in conducting a comprehensive analysis. For example, when reviewing an article about the latest breakthroughs in genetics, the reviewer may draw upon the background knowledge provided to facilitate a more in-depth evaluation of the publication.
Need a Hand From Professionals?
Address to Our Writers and Get Assistance in Any Questions!
Formatting an Article Review
The format of the article should always adhere to the citation style required by your professor. If you're not sure, seek clarification on the preferred format and ask him to clarify several other pointers to complete the formatting of an article review adequately.
How Many Publications Should You Review?
- In what format should you cite your articles (MLA, APA, ASA, Chicago, etc.)?
- What length should your review be?
- Should you include a summary, critique, or personal opinion in your assignment?
- Do you need to call attention to a theme or central idea within the articles?
- Does your instructor require background information?
When you know the answers to these questions, you may start writing your assignment. Below are examples of MLA and APA formats, as those are the two most common citation styles.
Using the APA Format
Articles appear most commonly in academic journals, newspapers, and websites. If you write an article review in the APA format, you will need to write bibliographical entries for the sources you use:
- Web : Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Year, Month, Date of Publication). Title. Retrieved from {link}
- Journal : Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Publication Year). Publication Title. Periodical Title, Volume(Issue), pp.-pp.
- Newspaper : Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Year, Month, Date of Publication). Publication Title. Magazine Title, pp. xx-xx.
Using MLA Format
- Web : Last, First Middle Initial. “Publication Title.” Website Title. Website Publisher, Date Month Year Published. Web. Date Month Year Accessed.
- Newspaper : Last, First M. “Publication Title.” Newspaper Title [City] Date, Month, Year Published: Page(s). Print.
- Journal : Last, First M. “Publication Title.” Journal Title Series Volume. Issue (Year Published): Page(s). Database Name. Web. Date Month Year Accessed.
Enhance your writing effortlessly with EssayPro.com , where you can order an article review or any other writing task. Our team of expert writers specializes in various fields, ensuring your work is not just summarized, but deeply analyzed and professionally presented. Ideal for students and professionals alike, EssayPro offers top-notch writing assistance tailored to your needs. Elevate your writing today with our skilled team at your article review writing service !
The Pre-Writing Process
Facing this task for the first time can really get confusing and can leave you unsure of where to begin. To create a top-notch article review, start with a few preparatory steps. Here are the two main stages from our dissertation services to get you started:
Step 1: Define the right organization for your review. Knowing the future setup of your paper will help you define how you should read the article. Here are the steps to follow:
- Summarize the article — seek out the main points, ideas, claims, and general information presented in the article.
- Define the positive points — identify the strong aspects, ideas, and insightful observations the author has made.
- Find the gaps —- determine whether or not the author has any contradictions, gaps, or inconsistencies in the article and evaluate whether or not he or she used a sufficient amount of arguments and information to support his or her ideas.
- Identify unanswered questions — finally, identify if there are any questions left unanswered after reading the piece.
Step 2: Move on and review the article. Here is a small and simple guide to help you do it right:
- Start off by looking at and assessing the title of the piece, its abstract, introductory part, headings and subheadings, opening sentences in its paragraphs, and its conclusion.
- First, read only the beginning and the ending of the piece (introduction and conclusion). These are the parts where authors include all of their key arguments and points. Therefore, if you start with reading these parts, it will give you a good sense of the author's main points.
- Finally, read the article fully.
These three steps make up most of the prewriting process. After you are done with them, you can move on to writing your own review—and we are going to guide you through the writing process as well.
Outline and Template
As you progress with reading your article, organize your thoughts into coherent sections in an outline. As you read, jot down important facts, contributions, or contradictions. Identify the shortcomings and strengths of your publication. Begin to map your outline accordingly.
If your professor does not want a summary section or a personal critique section, then you must alleviate those parts from your writing. Much like other assignments, an article review must contain an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. Thus, you might consider dividing your outline according to these sections as well as subheadings within the body. If you find yourself troubled with the pre-writing and the brainstorming process for this assignment, seek out a sample outline.
Your custom essay must contain these constituent parts:
- Pre-Title Page - Before diving into your review, start with essential details: article type, publication title, and author names with affiliations (position, department, institution, location, and email). Include corresponding author info if needed.
- Running Head - In APA format, use a concise title (under 40 characters) to ensure consistent formatting.
- Summary Page - Optional but useful. Summarize the article in 800 words, covering background, purpose, results, and methodology, avoiding verbatim text or references.
- Title Page - Include the full title, a 250-word abstract, and 4-6 keywords for discoverability.
- Introduction - Set the stage with an engaging overview of the article.
- Body - Organize your analysis with headings and subheadings.
- Works Cited/References - Properly cite all sources used in your review.
- Optional Suggested Reading Page - If permitted, suggest further readings for in-depth exploration.
- Tables and Figure Legends (if instructed by the professor) - Include visuals when requested by your professor for clarity.
Example of an Article Review
You might wonder why we've dedicated a section of this article to discuss an article review sample. Not everyone may realize it, but examining multiple well-constructed examples of review articles is a crucial step in the writing process. In the following section, our essay writing service experts will explain why.
Looking through relevant article review examples can be beneficial for you in the following ways:
- To get you introduced to the key works of experts in your field.
- To help you identify the key people engaged in a particular field of science.
- To help you define what significant discoveries and advances were made in your field.
- To help you unveil the major gaps within the existing knowledge of your field—which contributes to finding fresh solutions.
- To help you find solid references and arguments for your own review.
- To help you generate some ideas about any further field of research.
- To help you gain a better understanding of the area and become an expert in this specific field.
- To get a clear idea of how to write a good review.
View Our Writer’s Sample Before Crafting Your Own!
Why Have There Been No Great Female Artists?
Steps for Writing an Article Review
Here is a guide with critique paper format on how to write a review paper:
Step 1: Write the Title
First of all, you need to write a title that reflects the main focus of your work. Respectively, the title can be either interrogative, descriptive, or declarative.
Step 2: Cite the Article
Next, create a proper citation for the reviewed article and input it following the title. At this step, the most important thing to keep in mind is the style of citation specified by your instructor in the requirements for the paper. For example, an article citation in the MLA style should look as follows:
Author's last and first name. "The title of the article." Journal's title and issue(publication date): page(s). Print
Abraham John. "The World of Dreams." Virginia Quarterly 60.2(1991): 125-67. Print.
Step 3: Article Identification
After your citation, you need to include the identification of your reviewed article:
- Title of the article
- Title of the journal
- Year of publication
All of this information should be included in the first paragraph of your paper.
The report "Poverty increases school drop-outs" was written by Brian Faith – a Health officer – in 2000.
Step 4: Introduction
Your organization in an assignment like this is of the utmost importance. Before embarking on your writing process, you should outline your assignment or use an article review template to organize your thoughts coherently.
- If you are wondering how to start an article review, begin with an introduction that mentions the article and your thesis for the review.
- Follow up with a summary of the main points of the article.
- Highlight the positive aspects and facts presented in the publication.
- Critique the publication by identifying gaps, contradictions, disparities in the text, and unanswered questions.
Step 5: Summarize the Article
Make a summary of the article by revisiting what the author has written about. Note any relevant facts and findings from the article. Include the author's conclusions in this section.
Step 6: Critique It
Present the strengths and weaknesses you have found in the publication. Highlight the knowledge that the author has contributed to the field. Also, write about any gaps and/or contradictions you have found in the article. Take a standpoint of either supporting or not supporting the author's assertions, but back up your arguments with facts and relevant theories that are pertinent to that area of knowledge. Rubrics and templates can also be used to evaluate and grade the person who wrote the article.
Step 7: Craft a Conclusion
In this section, revisit the critical points of your piece, your findings in the article, and your critique. Also, write about the accuracy, validity, and relevance of the results of the article review. Present a way forward for future research in the field of study. Before submitting your article, keep these pointers in mind:
- As you read the article, highlight the key points. This will help you pinpoint the article's main argument and the evidence that they used to support that argument.
- While you write your review, use evidence from your sources to make a point. This is best done using direct quotations.
- Select quotes and supporting evidence adequately and use direct quotations sparingly. Take time to analyze the article adequately.
- Every time you reference a publication or use a direct quotation, use a parenthetical citation to avoid accidentally plagiarizing your article.
- Re-read your piece a day after you finish writing it. This will help you to spot grammar mistakes and to notice any flaws in your organization.
- Use a spell-checker and get a second opinion on your paper.
The Post-Writing Process: Proofread Your Work
Finally, when all of the parts of your article review are set and ready, you have one last thing to take care of — proofreading. Although students often neglect this step, proofreading is a vital part of the writing process and will help you polish your paper to ensure that there are no mistakes or inconsistencies.
To proofread your paper properly, start by reading it fully and checking the following points:
- Punctuation
- Other mistakes
Afterward, take a moment to check for any unnecessary information in your paper and, if found, consider removing it to streamline your content. Finally, double-check that you've covered at least 3-4 key points in your discussion.
And remember, if you ever need help with proofreading, rewriting your essay, or even want to buy essay , our friendly team is always here to assist you.
Need an Article REVIEW WRITTEN?
Just send us the requirements to your paper and watch one of our writers crafting an original paper for you.
What Is A Review Article?
How to write an article review, how to write an article review in apa format.
Daniel Parker
is a seasoned educational writer focusing on scholarship guidance, research papers, and various forms of academic essays including reflective and narrative essays. His expertise also extends to detailed case studies. A scholar with a background in English Literature and Education, Daniel’s work on EssayPro blog aims to support students in achieving academic excellence and securing scholarships. His hobbies include reading classic literature and participating in academic forums.
is an expert in nursing and healthcare, with a strong background in history, law, and literature. Holding advanced degrees in nursing and public health, his analytical approach and comprehensive knowledge help students navigate complex topics. On EssayPro blog, Adam provides insightful articles on everything from historical analysis to the intricacies of healthcare policies. In his downtime, he enjoys historical documentaries and volunteering at local clinics.
How to Write an Effective Article Review – Updated 2024 Guide
Purpose of an Article Review
Importance of writing an effective review, read the article thoroughly, identify the main arguments, take notes on key points.
- Evaluate the Author's Credibility
- Assess the Article's Structure and Organization
Examine the Use of Evidence and Examples
Write a concise summary of the article.
- Include the Article's Main Points
Avoid Personal Opinions in the Summary
Identify strengths and weaknesses.
- Evaluate the Article's Logic and Reasoning
- Discuss the Article's Impact and Relevance
Start with an Engaging Introduction
Provide a brief overview of the article.
- Critique the Article's Strengths and Weaknesses
Offer Suggestions for Improvement
Conclude with a summary and recommendation, check for grammar and spelling errors, ensure clarity and coherence of writing, revise for proper formatting and citations, review the overall structure and flow, make final edits and revisions, submit the article review.
Writing an article review can be a challenging task, but it is an essential skill for academics, researchers, and anyone who needs to critically evaluate published work. An article review is a written piece that provides a comprehensive analysis and evaluation of a scholarly article, book, or other published material. It goes beyond a simple summary by offering a critical assessment of the work’s strengths, weaknesses, and overall contribution to the field. In this blog post, we will explore the steps involved in writing an effective article review.
I. Introduction
The primary purpose of an article review is to provide a critical evaluation of a published work. It serves as a means of engaging with the ideas and arguments presented by the author(s) and assessing their validity, significance, and potential impact on the field. An article review allows the reviewer to analyze the work’s merits, identify its limitations, and offer constructive feedback or suggestions for further research or discussion.
Writing an effective article review is crucial for several reasons. First, it demonstrates the reviewer’s ability to critically analyze and synthesize complex information. This skill is highly valued in academic and professional settings, where critical thinking and analytical skills are essential . Second, article reviews contribute to the ongoing scholarly discourse by providing informed perspectives and critiques that can shape future research and discussions. Finally, well-written article reviews can help readers determine whether a particular work is worth reading or exploring further, making them valuable resources for researchers and scholars in the field.
II. Understanding the Article
The first step in writing an article review is to read the article carefully and thoroughly. This may seem obvious, but it is crucial to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the work before attempting to critique it. During the initial reading, focus on grasping the main arguments, key points, and the overall structure of the article. Take note of any unfamiliar concepts, terminology, or references that may require further research or clarification.
As you read the article, pay close attention to the author’s central arguments or thesis statements. Identify the main claims, hypotheses, or research questions that the article attempts to address. Understanding the core arguments is essential for evaluating the effectiveness of the author’s reasoning and the validity of their conclusions.
While reading the article, it is helpful to take notes on the key points, supporting evidence, and any critical or thought-provoking ideas presented by the author(s). These notes will serve as a reference when you begin writing the review and will help you organize your thoughts and critique more effectively.
III. Analyzing the Article
Evaluate the author’s credibility.
When analyzing an article, it is essential to consider the author’s credibility and expertise in the field. Research the author’s background, qualifications, and previous publications to assess their authority on the subject matter. This information can provide valuable context and help you determine the weight and reliability of the arguments presented in the article.
Assess the Article’s Structure and Organization
Evaluate the overall structure and organization of the article. Is the information presented in a logical and coherent manner? Does the article follow a clear progression from introduction to conclusion? Assessing the structure can help you determine whether the author has effectively communicated their ideas and arguments.
Critically examine the evidence and examples used by the author(s) to support their arguments. Are the sources credible and up-to-date? Are the examples relevant and well-chosen? Evaluating the quality and appropriateness of the evidence can help you assess the strength and validity of the author’s claims.
IV. Summarizing the Article
Before delving into your critique, it is essential to provide a concise summary of the article . This summary should briefly outline the article’s main arguments, key points, and conclusions. The goal is to give the reader a clear understanding of the article’s content without adding any personal opinions or critiques at this stage.
Include the Article’s Main Points
In your summary, be sure to include the article’s main points and the evidence or examples used to support them. This will help the reader understand the context and the basis for the author’s arguments, which is crucial for your subsequent critique.
When summarizing the article, it is important to remain objective and avoid injecting personal opinions or critiques. The summary should be a neutral representation of the article’s content, leaving the analysis and evaluation for the critique section.
V. Critiquing the Article
After providing a summary, it is time to analyze and critique the article. Begin by identifying the article’s strengths and weaknesses . Strengths may include well-reasoned arguments, thorough research, innovative ideas, or significant contributions to the field. Weaknesses could include flawed logic, lack of evidence, oversimplification of complex issues, or failure to address counterarguments.
Evaluate the Article’s Logic and Reasoning
Carefully evaluate the author’s logic and reasoning throughout the article. Are the arguments well-supported and logically consistent? Do the conclusions follow naturally from the evidence presented? Identify any logical fallacies, contradictions, or gaps in reasoning that may undermine the author’s arguments.
Discuss the Article’s Impact and Relevance
Consider the article’s potential impact and relevance within the broader context of the field. How does it contribute to existing knowledge or challenge prevailing theories? Does it open up new avenues for research or discussion? Discussing the article’s impact and relevance can help readers understand its significance and importance.
VI. Writing the Article Review
Begin your article review with an engaging introduction that captures the reader’s attention and provides context for the review. Briefly introduce the article, its author(s), and the main topic or research area. You can also include a concise thesis statement that summarizes your overall evaluation or critique of the article.
After the introduction, provide a brief overview or summary of the article. This should be a condensed version of the summary you wrote earlier, highlighting the article’s main arguments, key points, and conclusions. Keep this section concise and focused, as the main critique will follow.
Critique the Article’s Strengths and Weaknesses
In the critique section, present your analysis of the article’s strengths and weaknesses. Discuss the author’s use of evidence, the validity of their arguments, and the overall quality of their reasoning. Support your critique with specific examples and references from the article. Be sure to provide balanced criticism, acknowledging both the positive and negative aspects of the work.
In addition to critiquing the article , consider offering constructive suggestions for improvement. These suggestions could address areas where the author’s arguments were weak or where additional research or discussion is needed. Your suggestions should be specific and actionable, aimed at enhancing the quality and impact of the work.
Conclude your article review by summarizing your main points and providing an overall recommendation or final assessment of the article. This recommendation could be to read or not read the article, to use it as a reference in a specific context, or to consider it as a starting point for further research or discussion.
VII. Editing and Proofreading
After you have completed your initial draft, it is essential to carefully proofread and edit your work. Check for any grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, or typos that may have been overlooked during the writing process. These small errors can detract from the overall quality and professionalism of your review.
In addition to checking for mechanical errors , ensure that your writing is clear, concise, and coherent. Review your sentences and paragraphs for clarity, and make sure that your ideas flow logically from one point to the next. Avoid ambiguous or confusing language that could make your critique difficult to understand.
Depending on the specific requirements or guidelines for your article review, you may need to revise your work to ensure proper formatting and citation styles. Check that you have correctly cited any references or quotes from the article you are reviewing, and that your formatting (e.g., headings, spacing, font) adheres to the specified guidelines.
VIII. Finalizing the Review
Before finalizing your article review , take a step back and review the overall structure and flow of your writing. Ensure that your introduction effectively sets the stage for your critique, and that your body paragraphs logically build upon one another, leading to a well-supported conclusion.
During this final review, consider whether your critique is balanced and objective, presenting both the strengths and weaknesses of the article in a fair and impartial manner. Also, check that you have provided sufficient evidence and examples to support your analysis and that your arguments are clearly articulated.
After reviewing the overall structure and flow, make any necessary final edits and revisions to your article review. This might involve reorganizing or reworking certain sections for better clarity, strengthening your arguments with additional evidence, or refining your writing style for greater impact.
Pay close attention to your choice of words and tone, ensuring that your critique remains respectful and professional, even when addressing the article’s shortcomings. Remember, the goal is to provide a constructive and well-reasoned analysis, not to disparage or attack the author’s work.
Once you are satisfied with your article review, it is time to submit it according to the appropriate guidelines or requirements . This might involve formatting your work in a specific style, adhering to word count or page limits, or following specific submission procedures.
If your article review is intended for publication, be sure to follow the guidelines provided by the journal or publication outlet. This may include submitting your work through an online portal, adhering to specific formatting requirements, or including additional materials such as an abstract or author biography.
Congratulations! By following these steps, you have successfully written a comprehensive and effective article review. Remember, the process of critically evaluating published work is an essential skill that not only demonstrates your ability to analyze and synthesize complex information but also contributes to the ongoing scholarly discourse within your field.
Writing an article review can be a challenging task, but it is a valuable exercise that sharpens your critical thinking, analytical, and communication skills. By carefully reading and understanding the article, assessing its strengths and weaknesses, and providing a well-reasoned critique, you contribute to the advancement of knowledge and foster a deeper understanding of the subject matter.
So, embrace the opportunity to write article reviews, and use each one as a platform to engage with the ideas and arguments presented by scholars and researchers. Your thoughtful and insightful critiques can shape future research, inspire new perspectives, and ultimately drive progress within your field of study.
- RESEARCH PAPER FOR SALE
- RESEARCH PAPER WRITER
- RESEARCH PROPOSAL WRITING SERVICES
- SCHOLARSHIP ESSAY HELP
- SPEECH HELP
- STATISTICS HOMEWORK HELP
- TERM PAPER WRITING HELP
- THESIS EDITING SERVICES
- THESIS PROPOSAL WRITING SERVICE
- TRIGONOMETRY HOMEWORK HELP
- ADMISSION ESSAY WRITING HELP
- BIOLOGY PAPER WRITING SERVICE
- BOOK REPORT WRITING HELP
- BUY BOOK REVIEW
- BUY COURSEWORKS
- BUY DISCUSSION POST
- BUY TERM PAPER
- CAPSTONE PROJECT WRITING SERVICE
- COURSEWORK WRITING SERVICE
- CRITIQUE MY ESSAY
- CUSTOM RESEARCH PAPER
- CUSTOMER CONDUCT
- DISSERTATION EDITING SERVICE
- DISSERTATION WRITERS
- DO MY DISSERTATION FOR ME
- DO MY POWERPOINT PRESENTATION
- EDIT MY PAPER
- English Research Paper Writing Service
- ENGLISH RESEARCH PAPER WRITING SERVICE
- ESSAY WRITING HELP
- ESSAYS FOR SALE
- GRADUATE PAPER WRITING SERVICE
- LAW ASSIGNMENT WRITING HELP
- MARKETING ASSIGNMENT WRITING HELP
- NON-PLAGIARIZED ESSAYS
- NURSING ASSIGNMENT HELP
- PAY FOR COURSEWORK
- PAY FOR ESSAYS
- PAY FOR LITERATURE REVIEW
- PAY FOR PAPERS
- PAY FOR RESEARCH PAPERS
- PERSONAL STATEMENT EDITING SERVICE
- PERSONAL STATEMENT WRITER
- PERSUASIVE ESSAY WRITING HELP
- PERSUASIVE ESSAY WRITING SERVICES
- PHD THESIS WRITING SERVICE
- PROOFREAD MY PAPER
- PSYCHOLOGY ESSAY WRITING SERVICES
- THESIS STATEMENT HELP
- WRITE MY ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR ME
- WRITE MY CASE STUDY
- WRITE MY DISCUSSION BOARD POST
- WRITE MY LAB REPORT
- Election 2024
- Entertainment
- Newsletters
- Photography
- AP Buyline Personal Finance
- AP Buyline Shopping
- Press Releases
- Israel-Hamas War
- Russia-Ukraine War
- Global elections
- Asia Pacific
- Latin America
- Middle East
- Election results
- Google trends
- AP & Elections
- U.S. Open Tennis
- Paralympic Games
- College football
- Auto Racing
- Movie reviews
- Book reviews
- Financial Markets
- Business Highlights
- Financial wellness
- Artificial Intelligence
- Social Media
A 14-year-old boy is charged with killing 4 people at his Georgia high school. Here’s what we know
Two students view a memorial as the flags fly half-staff after a shooting Wednesday at Apalachee High School, Thursday, Sept. 5, 2024, in Winder, Ga. (AP Photo/Mike Stewart)
Flowers are displayed at a memorial outside Apalachee High School, Friday, Sept. 6, 2024, in Winder, Ga., following a shooting at the school earlier in the week. (Arvin Temkar/Atlanta Journal-Constitution via AP)
Colt Gray, charged as an adult with four counts of murder, sits in the Barrow County courthouse during his first appearance for the Wednesday shooting at Apalachee High School, Friday, Sept. 6, 2024, in Winder, Ga. (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson, Pool)
This combo of booking images provided by the Barrow County, Ga., Sheriff’s Office shows Colin Gray, left, and his son Colt Gray, who have been charged in relation to the Wednesday, Sept. 4, 2024, shootings at Apalachee High School in Winder, Ga. (Barrow County Sheriff’s Office via AP)
Mark Gorman holds a candle during a candlelight vigil for the slain students and teachers at Apalachee High School, Wednesday, Sept. 4, 2024, in Winder, Ga. (AP Photo/Mike Stewart)
Georgia Bureau of Investigation staff move through an entrance to Apalachee High School after Wednesday’s shooting, Thursday, Sept. 5, 2024, in Winder, Ga. (AP Photo/Mike Stewart)
The rental home of Colt Gray, the 14-year-old suspect who has been charged as an adult with murder in the shootings Wednesday, Sept. 4., at Apalachee High School, is shown Thursday, Sept. 5, 2024, in Winder, Ga. (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson)
- Copy Link copied
A 14-year-old boy stands charged with four counts of murder, accused of using a semiautomatic assault-style rifle to kill two students and two teachers this week at his high school in Georgia.
Colt Gray had his first hearing Friday after being charged as an adult in the latest mass shooting at a school in the U.S.
Immediately after that hearing, his father, 54-year-old Colin Gray, appeared in the same courtroom, charged with multiple offenses for allowing his son to have a weapon.
The shooting Wednesday morning at Apalachee High School in Winder, outside Atlanta, has left the father and son behind bars, families planning funerals and people wondering what happened and why.
Here is what we know and don’t know at this point.
How it happened
WHAT WE KNOW: Colt Gray was in algebra class when he left the classroom, according to classmates. One believed he was skipping class again. But Gray returned and knocked for someone to open the locked door. Students who went to the door saw something through the window and backed away. Classmate Lyela Sayarath said she saw Gray turn and then heard gunshots — “10 or 15 of them at once, back-to-back.” A school resource officer found the shooter, who surrendered at 10:26 a.m. Authorities say the suspect killed four people. Nine others were hurt, seven of them shot. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation says the suspect acted alone.
WHAT WE DON’T KNOW: Authorities have not identified a motive for the shootings. Officials also have not said where in the school the victims were shot. Eyewitness accounts indicate some were shot in a hallway and at least one in a classroom, however. It’s also not known how the suspect got to school that day, whether he took a bus or got a ride; how the gun got into the school; and where it was ahead of the shooting. Authorities say the school does not have metal detectors.
Who the victims were
WHAT WE KNOW: Authorities have identified the four people killed as students Christian Angulo and Mason Schermerhorn, both 14, and math teachers Richard Aspinwall, 39, and Cristina Irimie, 53. The eight students and one teacher who were taken to the hospital are expected to make full recoveries. Angulo’s sister Lisette described him on a GoFundMe fundraiser for his funeral as “a very good kid and very sweet and so caring.” A neighbor of Schermerhorn said he was an inquisitive boy who he watched grow up from around age 4. Irimie was a recent immigrant from Romania who also helped teach a children’s dance group. Aspinwall was also the defensive coordinator for the high school football team, an old-style football coach who loved his wife, daughters, students and football, according to the head coach.
WHAT WE DON’T KNOW: Just as we don’t know a motive for the shootings, it’s not known if the shooter targeted the victims or it was merely chance.
The suspected shooter
WHAT IS KNOWN: Colt Gray faces four counts of murder, but officials said Friday that more charges are coming. This isn’t the teen’s first interaction with authorities, who interviewed him over a social media post last year about possibly threatening to shoot up a middle school. Gray, then 13, said “he would never say such a thing, even in a joking manner,” according to a report filed by investigators. No action was taken because of inconsistent information about the social media account. Colin Gray told the investigator back then that Colt had access to unloaded guns in the house but knew “how to use them and not use them.” He also said his son had struggled since he and his wife separated and Colt was picked on in school. The two shot guns together, and the elder Gray showed the investigator a cellphone photo of the boy from a recent trip with blood on his cheeks after shooting his first deer. It was “the greatest day ever,” the father said.
WHAT IS NOT KNOWN: Not much is known about the Grays between the investigator’s visit in May 2023 and the shooting. They had lived in a neighboring county at the time of the interview but moved to Winder at some point. Investigative reports indicated when Colin Gray separated from his wife, two younger children moved with her but Colt lived with his dad. He was a recent transfer to Apalachee High School and missed a lot of classes, fellow students said.
Why the father was charged
WHAT WE KNOW: Colin Gray, who works construction, became the first parent of a school shooting suspect to be charged in Georgia, District Attorney Brad Smith said Friday. But in Michigan, two parents were previously convicted in a similar case. Gray has been charged with four counts of involuntary manslaughter, two counts of second-degree murder and eight counts of cruelty to children for knowingly allowing his son to possess a gun that authorities say was used in the shooting.
WHAT WE DON’T KNOW: Even though authorities allege Colin Gray allowed his son to have the assault-style rifle, it’s not clear how or when the boy came into possession of it. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation is declining to release additional information because of the ongoing investigation. “The shooter is alive and is facing charges and we are working on preparing a strong case that needs to go through the judicial process,” the agency said on its website.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
- Advanced Search
- Journal List
A Guide to Writing a Scientific Paper: A Focus on High School Through Graduate Level Student Research
Renee a. hesselbach.
1 NIEHS Children's Environmental Health Sciences Core Center, University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
David H. Petering
2 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Craig A. Berg
3 Curriculum and Instruction, University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Henry Tomasiewicz
Daniel weber.
This article presents a detailed guide for high school through graduate level instructors that leads students to write effective and well-organized scientific papers. Interesting research emerges from the ability to ask questions, define problems, design experiments, analyze and interpret data, and make critical connections. This process is incomplete, unless new results are communicated to others because science fundamentally requires peer review and criticism to validate or discard proposed new knowledge. Thus, a concise and clearly written research paper is a critical step in the scientific process and is important for young researchers as they are mastering how to express scientific concepts and understanding. Moreover, learning to write a research paper provides a tool to improve science literacy as indicated in the National Research Council's National Science Education Standards (1996), and A Framework for K–12 Science Education (2011), the underlying foundation for the Next Generation Science Standards currently being developed. Background information explains the importance of peer review and communicating results, along with details of each critical component, the Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results , and Discussion . Specific steps essential to helping students write clear and coherent research papers that follow a logical format, use effective communication, and develop scientific inquiry are described.
Introduction
A key part of the scientific process is communication of original results to others so that one's discoveries are passed along to the scientific community and the public for awareness and scrutiny. 1 – 3 Communication to other scientists ensures that new findings become part of a growing body of publicly available knowledge that informs how we understand the world around us. 2 It is also what fuels further research as other scientists incorporate novel findings into their thinking and experiments.
Depending upon the researcher's position, intent, and needs, communication can take different forms. The gold standard is writing scientific papers that describe original research in such a way that other scientists will be able to repeat it or to use it as a basis for their studies. 1 For some, it is expected that such articles will be published in scientific journals after they have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication. Scientists must submit their articles for examination by other scientists familiar with the area of research, who decide whether the work was conducted properly and whether the results add to the knowledge base and are conveyed well enough to merit publication. 2 If a manuscript passes the scrutiny of peer-review, it has the potential to be published. 1 For others, such as for high school or undergraduate students, publishing a research paper may not be the ultimate goal. However, regardless of whether an article is to be submitted for publication, peer review is an important step in this process. For student researchers, writing a well-organized research paper is a key step in learning how to express understanding, make critical connections, summarize data, and effectively communicate results, which are important goals for improving science literacy of the National Research Council's National Science Education Standards, 4 and A Framework for K–12 Science Education, 5 and the Next Generation Science Standards 6 currently being developed and described in The NSTA Reader's Guide to A Framework for K–12 Science Education. 7 Table 1 depicts the key skills students should develop as part of the Science as Inquiry Content Standard. Table 2 illustrates the central goals of A Framework for K–12 Science Education Scientific and Engineering Practices Dimension.
Key Skills of the Science as Inquiry National Science Education Content Standard
Identify questions and concepts that guide scientific investigation |
Design and conduct scientific investigations |
Use technology and mathematics to improve investigations and communications |
Formulate and revise scientific explanations and models using logic and evidence |
Recognize and analyze alternative explanations and models |
Communicate and defend a scientific argument |
National Research Council (1996).
Important Practices of A Framework for K–12 Science Education Scientific and Engineering Practices Dimension
Asking questions and defining problems |
Developing and using models |
Planning and carrying out investigations |
Analyzing and interpreting data |
Using mathematics and computational thinking |
Constructing explanations and designing solutions |
Engaging in argument from evidence |
Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information |
National Research Council (2011).
Scientific papers based on experimentation typically include five predominant sections: Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion . This structure is a widely accepted approach to writing a research paper, and has specific sections that parallel the scientific method. Following this structure allows the scientist to tell a clear, coherent story in a logical format, essential to effective communication. 1 , 2 In addition, using a standardized format allows the reader to find specific information quickly and easily. While readers may not have time to read the entire research paper, the predictable format allows them to focus on specific sections such as the Abstract , Introduction , and Discussion sections. Therefore, it is critical that information be placed in the appropriate and logical section of the report. 3
Guidelines for Writing a Primary Research Article
The Title sends an important message to the reader about the purpose of the paper. For example, Ethanol Effects on the Developing Zebrafish: Neurobehavior and Skeletal Morphogenesis 8 tells the reader key information about the content of the research paper. Also, an appropriate and descriptive title captures the attention of the reader. When composing the Title , students should include either the aim or conclusion of the research, the subject, and possibly the independent or dependent variables. Often, the title is created after the body of the article has been written, so that it accurately reflects the purpose and content of the article. 1 , 3
The Abstract provides a short, concise summary of the research described in the body of the article and should be able to stand alone. It provides readers with a quick overview that helps them decide whether the article may be interesting to read. Included in the Abstract are the purpose or primary objectives of the experiment and why they are important, a brief description of the methods and approach used, key findings and the significance of the results, and how this work is different from the work of others. It is important to note that the Abstract briefly explains the implications of the findings, but does not evaluate the conclusions. 1 , 3 Just as with the Title , this section needs to be written carefully and succinctly. Often this section is written last to ensure it accurately reflects the content of the paper. Generally, the optimal length of the Abstract is one paragraph between 200 and 300 words, and does not contain references or abbreviations.
All new research can be categorized by field (e.g., biology, chemistry, physics, geology) and by area within the field (e.g., biology: evolution, ecology, cell biology, anatomy, environmental health). Many areas already contain a large volume of published research. The role of the Introduction is to place the new research within the context of previous studies in the particular field and area, thereby introducing the audience to the research and motivating the audience to continue reading. 1
Usually, the writer begins by describing what is known in the area that directly relates to the subject of the article's research. Clearly, this must be done judiciously; usually there is not room to describe every bit of information that is known. Each statement needs one or more references from the scientific literature that supports its validity. Students must be reminded to cite all references to eliminate the risk of plagiarism. 2 Out of this context, the author then explains what is not known and, therefore, what the article's research seeks to find out. In doing so, the scientist provides the rationale for the research and further develops why this research is important. The final statement in the Introduction should be a clearly worded hypothesis or thesis statement, as well as a brief summary of the findings as they relate to the stated hypothesis. Keep in mind that the details of the experimental findings are presented in the Results section and are aimed at filling the void in our knowledge base that has been pointed out in the Introduction .
Materials and Methods
Research utilizes various accepted methods to obtain the results that are to be shared with others in the scientific community. The quality of the results, therefore, depends completely upon the quality of the methods that are employed and the care with which they are applied. The reader will refer to the Methods section: (a) to become confident that the experiments have been properly done, (b) as the guide for repeating the experiments, and (c) to learn how to do new methods.
It is particularly important to keep in mind item (b). Since science deals with the objective properties of the physical and biological world, it is a basic axiom that these properties are independent of the scientist who reported them. Everyone should be able to measure or observe the same properties within error, if they do the same experiment using the same materials and procedures. In science, one does the same experiment by exactly repeating the experiment that has been described in the Methods section. Therefore, someone can only repeat an experiment accurately if all the relevant details of the experimental methods are clearly described. 1 , 3
The following information is important to include under illustrative headings, and is generally presented in narrative form. A detailed list of all the materials used in the experiments and, if important, their source should be described. These include biological agents (e.g., zebrafish, brine shrimp), chemicals and their concentrations (e.g., 0.20 mg/mL nicotine), and physical equipment (e.g., four 10-gallon aquariums, one light timer, one 10-well falcon dish). The reader needs to know as much as necessary about each of the materials; however, it is important not to include extraneous information. For example, consider an experiment involving zebrafish. The type and characteristics of the zebrafish used must be clearly described so another scientist could accurately replicate the experiment, such as 4–6-month-old male and female zebrafish, the type of zebrafish used (e.g., Golden), and where they were obtained (e.g., the NIEHS Children's Environmental Health Sciences Core Center in the WATER Institute of the University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee). In addition to describing the physical set-up of the experiment, it may be helpful to include photographs or diagrams in the report to further illustrate the experimental design.
A thorough description of each procedure done in the reported experiment, and justification as to why a particular method was chosen to most effectively answer the research question should also be included. For example, if the scientist was using zebrafish to study developmental effects of nicotine, the reader needs to know details about how and when the zebrafish were exposed to the nicotine (e.g., maternal exposure, embryo injection of nicotine, exposure of developing embryo to nicotine in the water for a particular length of time during development), duration of the exposure (e.g., a certain concentration for 10 minutes at the two-cell stage, then the embryos were washed), how many were exposed, and why that method was chosen. The reader would also need to know the concentrations to which the zebrafish were exposed, how the scientist observed the effects of the chemical exposure (e.g., microscopic changes in structure, changes in swimming behavior), relevant safety and toxicity concerns, how outcomes were measured, and how the scientist determined whether the data/results were significantly different in experimental and unexposed control animals (statistical methods).
Students must take great care and effort to write a good Methods section because it is an essential component of the effective communication of scientific findings.
The Results section describes in detail the actual experiments that were undertaken in a clear and well-organized narrative. The information found in the Methods section serves as background for understanding these descriptions and does not need to be repeated. For each different experiment, the author may wish to provide a subtitle and, in addition, one or more introductory sentences that explains the reason for doing the experiment. In a sense, this information is an extension of the Introduction in that it makes the argument to the reader why it is important to do the experiment. The Introduction is more general; this text is more specific.
Once the reader understands the focus of the experiment, the writer should restate the hypothesis to be tested or the information sought in the experiment. For example, “Atrazine is routinely used as a crop pesticide. It is important to understand whether it affects organisms that are normally found in soil. We decided to use worms as a test organism because they are important members of the soil community. Because atrazine damages nerve cells, we hypothesized that exposure to atrazine will inhibit the ability of worms to do locomotor activities. In the first experiment, we tested the effect of the chemical on burrowing action.”
Then, the experiments to be done are described and the results entered. In reporting on experimental design, it is important to identify the dependent and independent variables clearly, as well as the controls. The results must be shown in a way that can be reproduced by the reader, but do not include more details than needed for an effective analysis. Generally, meaningful and significant data are gathered together into tables and figures that summarize relevant information, and appropriate statistical analyses are completed based on the data gathered. Besides presenting each of these data sources, the author also provides a written narrative of the contents of the figures and tables, as well as an analysis of the statistical significance. In the narrative, the writer also connects the results to the aims of the experiment as described above. Did the results support the initial hypothesis? Do they provide the information that was sought? Were there problems in the experiment that compromised the results? Be careful not to include an interpretation of the results; that is reserved for the Discussion section.
The writer then moves on to the next experiment. Again, the first paragraph is developed as above, except this experiment is seen in the context of the first experiment. In other words, a story is being developed. So, one commonly refers to the results of the first experiment as part of the basis for undertaking the second experiment. “In the first experiment we observed that atrazine altered burrowing activity. In order to understand how that might occur, we decided to study its impact on the basic biology of locomotion. Our hypothesis was that atrazine affected neuromuscular junctions. So, we did the following experiment..”
The Results section includes a focused critical analysis of each experiment undertaken. A hallmark of the scientist is a deep skepticism about results and conclusions. “Convince me! And then convince me again with even better experiments.” That is the constant challenge. Without this basic attitude of doubt and willingness to criticize one's own work, scientists do not get to the level of concern about experimental methods and results that is needed to ensure that the best experiments are being done and the most reproducible results are being acquired. Thus, it is important for students to state any limitations or weaknesses in their research approach and explain assumptions made upfront in this section so the validity of the research can be assessed.
The Discussion section is the where the author takes an overall view of the work presented in the article. First, the main results from the various experiments are gathered in one place to highlight the significant results so the reader can see how they fit together and successfully test the original hypotheses of the experiment. Logical connections and trends in the data are presented, as are discussions of error and other possible explanations for the findings, including an analysis of whether the experimental design was adequate. Remember, results should not be restated in the Discussion section, except insofar as it is absolutely necessary to make a point.
Second, the task is to help the reader link the present work with the larger body of knowledge that was portrayed in the Introduction . How do the results advance the field, and what are the implications? What does the research results mean? What is the relevance? 1 , 3
Lastly, the author may suggest further work that needs to be done based on the new knowledge gained from the research.
Supporting Documentation and Writing Skills
Tables and figures are included to support the content of the research paper. These provide the reader with a graphic display of information presented. Tables and figures must have illustrative and descriptive titles, legends, interval markers, and axis labels, as appropriate; should be numbered in the order that they appear in the report; and include explanations of any unusual abbreviations.
The final section of the scientific article is the Reference section. When citing sources, it is important to follow an accepted standardized format, such as CSE (Council of Science Editors), APA (American Psychological Association), MLA (Modern Language Association), or CMS (Chicago Manual of Style). References should be listed in alphabetical order and original authors cited. All sources cited in the text must be included in the Reference section. 1
When writing a scientific paper, the importance of writing concisely and accurately to clearly communicate the message should be emphasized to students. 1 – 3 Students should avoid slang and repetition, as well as abbreviations that may not be well known. 1 If an abbreviation must be used, identify the word with the abbreviation in parentheses the first time the term is used. Using appropriate and correct grammar and spelling throughout are essential elements of a well-written report. 1 , 3 Finally, when the article has been organized and formatted properly, students are encouraged to peer review to obtain constructive criticism and then to revise the manuscript appropriately. Good scientific writing, like any kind of writing, is a process that requires careful editing and revision. 1
A key dimension of NRC's A Framework for K–12 Science Education , Scientific and Engineering Practices, and the developing Next Generation Science Standards emphasizes the importance of students being able to ask questions, define problems, design experiments, analyze and interpret data, draw conclusions, and communicate results. 5 , 6 In the Science Education Partnership Award (SEPA) program at the University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, we found the guidelines presented in this article useful for high school science students because this group of students (and probably most undergraduates) often lack in understanding of, and skills to develop and write, the various components of an effective scientific paper. Students routinely need to focus more on the data collected and analyze what the results indicated in relation to the research question/hypothesis, as well as develop a detailed discussion of what they learned. Consequently, teaching students how to effectively organize and write a research report is a critical component when engaging students in scientific inquiry.
Acknowledgments
This article was supported by a Science Education Partnership Award (SEPA) grant (Award Number R25RR026299) from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health. The SEPA program at the University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee is part of the Children's Environmental Health Sciences Core Center, Community Outreach and Education Core, funded by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Award Number P30ES004184). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Put a stop to deadline pressure, and have your homework done by an expert.
How to Write An Article Review in a Few Steps?
Did you receive your first article review assignment from your professor and don’t really know what this is? Or perhaps you have a general idea about what a review article is, but you don’t know how to start writing it. Don’t worry about it too much. Most students have been in your shoes. Nobody knows how to write such an essay until they write the first one. You just have to do one simple thing: learn how to write an article review.
In other words, you need to understand exactly what an article review is. Furthermore, it’s also important to learn why this piece of writing is important. And once you take a look at how a typical review looks like, you can go ahead and try your hand at writing your very first essay. We will show you all the steps you need to take to write the paper, of course. They apply to all kinds of reviews, including the law review article and the science article review.
What Is an Article Review?
Before you learn how to start an article review, it’s important to understand what this paper is. So, what is an article review? Basically, an article review is an essay in which you analyze and summarize another piece of writing. Yes, the subject can be one of your own papers. However, most professors will assign you a specific article to review. Article review writing experience may come in handy when you’ll have to write literature review section for more complex papers.
In a research article review, you need to figure out the theme of the paper you are analyzing and then identify all the important ideas, supporting arguments and even opportunities for future research. Bottom line, you need to understand all of the main points of the paper you are about to review. It goes without saying that you need to read the subject article before writing a review article about it.
But what is peer review article? You won’t have to write such a paper in 99% of cases, but it’s good to know what it is. In a peer-reviewed article, the original article is written by an expert and reviewed by several other experts. This is done to ensure a high level of quality. But again, you probably won’t need this information during high school and college.
Why Is the Article Review Important?
You are probably wondering why you need to learn to write a journal article review. The truth is that this kind of writing is very important for a wide variety of reasons:
- It can clarify specific questions.
- It provides much-needed clarifications for vague terms or missing information.
- It helps the original author identify his mistakes and better himself.
- It improves students’ analytical skills and writing skills.
A critical review of journal article is not easy to write, but learning how to do it correctly has many benefits. Keep in mind that you will receive many such assignments in high school and in college. In other words, you absolutely must learn how to write a review article. And the first step is to look at an article review template.
Article Review Example Structure
Whether you have to write an APA article review or any other type of review, you must know how to structure it properly. Here is the typical article review format with all its sections:
- The title page.
- Your name (and the name of your coordinator, if necessary).
- The date on which the review has been written.
- An abstract. It should be anywhere between 200 and 300 words and should summarize your entire writing very concisely. Everything from the review question and the study being reviewed to the conclusions of your review should be covered. Remember, no citations in the abstract! To learn how to write an article review the proper way, you need to also learn how to write an abstract.
- The introduction. Here, you provide some background information about the topic of your research. Clearly tell your readers what the article about to be reviewed is about. Also present the overall structure of the body paragraphs so that your readers can easily understand what you will be talking about.
- The body paragraphs. We recommend three body paragraphs. Each one will discuss the main ideas you’ve outlined in the introduction.
- The conclusion. Of course, you can’t learn how to write a critical review of a journal article without learning how to write a good conclusion for it. In this paragraph, you just need to explain the purpose of the original article again and your review’s rationale. What have you uncovered? What can be changed? What needs more research?
- The citations. This is the bibliography section, written per APA or MLA requirements.
Learn How to Write a Review Article the Right Way
Of course, the easiest way to learn how to review an article is to read at least one article review sample. A good example will help you tremendously, to be honest. And the good news is that you can easily buy an example from a writing company online. This way, you can be sure that the example will be 100% original (very important if you want to use some ideas from the example of an article review in your own writing).
To help you as much as possible, we’ve put together a guide about how to write a review of an article. Here are the basic steps you need to take:
- Analyze the article. You won’t be able to learn how to write a article review unless you are willing to read the article. During this step, you have to analyze the positive aspects of the paper and identify all the contradictions, inconsistencies and gaps left by the author. If there are any questions that don’t have an answer, write them down.
- Read the article very carefully and look at its abstract, opening sentences, title, headings, intro and conclusion. Of course, take note of all the main ideas in the article.
- Create an outline that will be used for your review. Everything you feel is important should have its own heading. Keep in mind that you need to discuss at least three major aspects in the body paragraphs. You can’t learn how to review a research article until you learn how to create a good outline.
- Write the three body paragraphs first. This way, you will have an easier time writing the introduction.
- Write the introduction and don’t forget to include the article’s thesis. Don’t use the first person. End the intro with your impression of the article being reviewed. Does it contain inconsistencies? Don’t be afraid to say it.
- Write the conclusion. As we stated previously, you should summarize everything in your review and provide your readers with your honest opinion about the reviewed work.
- Write the abstract and then the bibliography section (also known as Works Cited or References).
Learning how to write article review is not as difficult as you think. You just need to work a bit on your critical writing skills. Again, a good article review example from seasoned assignment writers will help you quite a lot. Don’t forget, it’s easier to follow an example than to write blindly.
Get on top of your homework.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
Article review writing format, steps, examples and illustration PDF Compiled by Mohammed Yismaw
2021, Article review writing format, steps, examples and illustration PDF Compiled by Mohammed Yismaw
The purpose of this document is to help students and researchers understand how a review of an academic journal is conducted and reported in different fields of study. Review articles in academic journals that analyze or discuss researches previously published by others, rather than reporting new research results or findings. Summaries and critiques are two ways to write a review of a scientific journal article. Both types of writing ask you first to read and understand an article from the primary literature about your topic. The summary involves briefly but accurately stating the key points of the article for a reader who has not read the original article. The critique begins by summarizing the article and then analyzes and evaluates the author’s research. Summaries and critiques help you learn to synthesize information from different sources and are usually limited to two pages maximum.
Related Papers
Harald von Kortzfleisch , Christoph Kahle
Neue Technologien und Innovationen stellen heutzutage wichtige Schlüsselelemente der Wachstums und Erfolgssicherung von Unternehmen dar. Durch einen in Geschwindigkeit und Intensität immer schneller zunehmenden Wettbewerb nehmen Innovationen eine immer zentralere Rolle im Praxisalltag von Unternehmen ein. Dieser technische Fortschritt treibt auch in der Wissenschaft das Thema des Innovationsmanagements in den letzten Jahrzehnten immer stärker voran und wird dort ausgiebig diskutiert. Die Bedeutung von Innovationen wächst dabei ebenfalls aus der Sicht der Kunden, welche heutzutage viel differenzierter als früher Produkte und Dienste nachfragen und somit Unternehmen vor neue Herausforderungen stellen. Ãberdies stellen Innovationen heute ein entscheidendes Bindeglied zwischen Marktorientierung und erhofften Unternehmenserfolg dar. Seit einigen Jahren lässt sich eine Ãffnung der Unternehmensgrenzen für externe Quellen wie Kunden, Zulieferer, Universitäten oder teilweise auch M...
SSRN Electronic Journal
Helmut Krcmar
Dominic Lindner
Alexandra Waluszewski
Research Policy
Nuria Gonzalez Alvarez
Creativity and Innovation Management
Matti Pihlajamaa
Firms tap into user knowledge to learn about the users’ needs. While users have been recognized as a valuable source of knowledge for innovation, few studies have investigated how their knowledge is integrated into innovation processes in the context of complex products and systems (CoPS). The purpose of this study is to reveal the practices of CoPS manufacturers to facilitate user knowledge utilization for innovation. We investigate two case companies, a medical device manufacturer and an aircraft manufacturer, and report on seven managerial practices for utilizing user knowledge. We adopt the absorptive capacity model in structuring our findings and elaborate three of the model's sub-capabilities (recognition of the value of user knowledge, acquisition of user knowledge, and assimilation/transformation of user knowledge) by proposing that each is associated with a distinct managerial goal and related practices: (1) Sensitizing the organization to the innovation potential of user knowledge, (2) identifying and gaining access to suitable user knowledge, and (3) analyzing and interpreting user knowledge and integrating it into product development. Our study contributes to the innovation management literature by analyzing the capabilities required to utilize user knowledge throughout the CoPS innovation process.
Information & Management
Diffusion of digital technologies into the manufacturing industry has created new opportunities for innovation that firms must address to remain competitive. We investigate the role of customer and user knowledge in the digital innovation processes of three global B2B manufacturing companies. We find that the B2B manufacturing industry's characteristics influence how users and customers may be leveraged. Customers making the purchasing decisions are considered for knowledge about short-term changes in market needs, while users working directly with the products provide long-term guidance for digital innovation. We identify practices for acquiring, distributing, and using customer and user knowledge for digital innovation.
Journal of business market management
Patricia Sandmeier
Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation
Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation JEMI
Given the rising role of users in innovation processes and the increasing amount of research in this field the aim of this paper is to explore the limits of our understanding of the user innovation (UI) concept. In doing so, the study addresses four basic questions: (1) Why do users create and share innovation? (2) Who is the user-innovator? (3) What type of innovation do users create? (4) How do users innovate? The results of a systematic literature review identified the main research streams on user innovation, together with weaknesses of past research and perspectives for future studies.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
RELATED PAPERS
Gernot Grabher
Journal of Computer‐ …
Petra Schubert , Kathrin Möslein
Mossimo Sesom
Shahab Zare
Arthur Shulman
International Journal of Technology Management
Richard Farr
European Journal of Dental Education
Y.P. CHANDRA
Chandra Yanto
Management Science
John Roberts
Maria Antikainen
Johanna Bragge
intechopen.com
Ivona Vrdoljak Raguz
Service Science
Tuure Tuunanen
Jouni K Juntunen
Benji Decker
Eva Heiskanen
Handbook of Marketing
Jerome Hauser
Service Industries Journal
Christian Kowalkowski
Journal of Engineering Design
Anna Rönnbäck , Ola Isaksson
Journal of Management
Bettina Bastian
International Journal of Innovation Management
Harald von Kortzfleisch
Guido H Baltes
Technology Analysis & Strategic Management
Raimo Lovio
Marco Bertoni , Christian Johansson
Dominik Walcher
Managing Service Quality
Tor W. Andreassen
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Gary Schirr
System Sciences, 2004. …
Dominik Walcher , Ralf Reichwald
Edina Vadovics
Jouni Similä
Luis Cancino Muñoz
Shell Artillery
Ralf Reichwald
Journal of the Academy of …
Ian Wilkinson , Subroto Roy
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
- Find new research papers in:
- Health Sciences
- Earth Sciences
- Cognitive Science
- Mathematics
- Computer Science
- Academia ©2024
> > |
|
---|
to print. This blank worksheet is for students to complete based on articles they have read. There are sections for both a summary and a critique. |
Learning to review published articles is a valuable skill for students for several reasons. : Reviewing articles requires students to think critically and evaluate the quality and credibility of the research, arguments, and evidence presented. This skill is transferable to many aspects of academic and professional life. : Reviewing articles helps students develop research skills. They learn how to locate, access, and analyze scholarly literature, which is essential for academic success. : Students gain a deeper understanding of the scientific method and research processes. They learn how research questions are formulated, data is collected, and conclusions are drawn. : Reviewing articles often involves summarizing research findings and critiquing writing styles. This helps students improve their own academic writing skills, including summarization, synthesis, and critical analysis. : Reviewing articles enhances information literacy. Students learn how to assess the reliability of sources, distinguish between primary and secondary sources, and identify bias or misinformation. : Reviewing articles exposes students to diverse viewpoints, research methodologies, and theories within their field of study. This broadens their horizons and helps them appreciate the complexity of academic discourse. : For students engaged in research projects, the ability to review articles is crucial. It helps them identify relevant literature, build on existing research, and identify gaps in knowledge. : Students learn the importance of evidence-based decision-making. They discover how research findings can inform policy, practice, and decision-making in various fields. : Reviewing articles allows students to actively participate in scholarly discourse. They can contribute their insights, opinions, and critiques to academic discussions. : Developing skills in reviewing articles can be beneficial for students pursuing careers in academia, research, publishing, or any field that requires critical analysis and evaluation of written work. : Engaging in article reviews provides students with a taste of the peer review process, which is fundamental to academic publishing. This experience can be valuable if they decide to submit their own research for publication in the future. : As students review articles across various topics and disciplines, they gain a broader knowledge base that can enhance their interdisciplinary understanding and problem-solving abilities. : Reviewing articles involves close reading and comprehension of complex texts. This strengthens students' reading skills and their ability to extract key information from dense academic writing. : Students often need to communicate their reviews effectively, which helps them develop communication and presentation skills. : Engaging in article reviews can contribute to personal growth by fostering intellectual curiosity and a lifelong commitment to learning. Overall, learning to review published articles is a multifaceted skill that not only benefits students academically but also equips them with critical thinking, research, and communication skills that are highly valuable in a variety of career paths and life situations. |
All materials on this website are © www.studenthandouts.com unless otherwise noted. Please contact us via Facebook or Twitter with any questions. - - - - |
Note: Product links are paid affiliate links. All links are deemed relevant and are not placed merely for profit. Purchase through these links helps to keep this educational website online and free. |
14-year-old girl set 15-year-old girl on fire in Saskatoon high school: police
Evan hardy collegiate student in hospital with serious injuries.
Shock in Saskatoon as teen girl set on fire by fellow high school student
Social sharing.
A 15-year-old girl was set on fire by a fellow student at Evan Hardy Collegiate in Saskatoon on Thursday, according to police.
"The suspect we have in custody started the other victim on fire," Saskatoon Police Service Sgt. Ken Kane told reporters at a news conference Thursday afternoon. The incident happened over the noon hour.
Teachers helped extinguish the blaze, Kane said. The 15-year-old victim was transported to hospital with what are believed to be serious injuries. One teacher was also taken to hospital.
Kane said the victim's parents are with her, but there was no update on her condition.
After the incident, a school resource officer (SRO) who was already on scene for a different matter arrested a 14-year-old female suspect immediately. Other police, fire and ambulance crews arrived shortly after, Kane said.
Teen girl lit on fire by another girl at Evan Hardy Collegiate, say Saskatoon police
SROs will continue to work closely with school board officials as the investigation continues.
Kane said the suspect remains in custody and that it's unclear what charges might be laid or when that could occur.
"This investigation is obviously very early and ongoing," he said.
He said police are working with the school division to share information and "ensure staff and students are cared for."
Kane said it's also been difficult on the officer and others who responded.
"The mood in our office is quite low," he said. "This is not something we ever expected."
No class on Friday
On Thursday afternoon, Evan Hardy Collegiate sent a letter to parents saying there would be no class on Friday and a scheduled football game was cancelled. Students will be permitted to pick up any belongings and officials hope to resume regular classes as soon as possible, the letter says.
"At school we will continue to provide a safe, caring and compassionate learning environment. When school resumes, we will maintain daily schedules and routines as much as possible, as this provides a sense of safety, security and comfort. We will also have additional counselling support at the school to respond to students' needs," read the statement.
Curtis Tweet is a parent whose daughter attends Evan Hardy. He questioned why there isn't more security in the schools.
"It's just gonna get worse and worse year after year. Like how many more kids are gonna get hurt? How many more kids [are going] to die before you hire security?" Tweet asked.
"There's no safe place to be in the city. I wouldn't classify school safe anywhere because we allow this to happen."
Tweet said it's one of the worst incidents he can recall happening in Saskatoon. He plans to take his daughter to the lake in Friday to spend time with her.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Jason Warick is a reporter with CBC Saskatoon.
with files from Liam O'Connor
Related Stories
- Girl, 14, charged with attempted murder after allegedly setting classmate on fire at Sask. high school
- Asbestos leak disrupts return to class at Laval, Que., high school
- Province announces 800 new seats for Surrey high school
- Book drive helps teachers rebuild classrooms after Thompson school fire
- Alberta premier says legislation on school pronouns coming late October
The Winter cohort application deadline is November 24, 2024.
Click here to apply.
Featured Posts
Sewanee Young Writers Conference - Should You Apply?
8 Tips to Help You Win Chemagination by the American Computer Science Society
10 Online Certificate Programs for High School Students
10 Entrepreneurship Programs for Middle School Students
8 Awesome Biology Articles for High School Students
Staying current with scientific articles enriches your knowledge and gives you a competitive edge in various academic endeavors. For high school students involved in research projects, keeping up with the latest findings in biology can provide new insights and enhance the quality of their work.
Additionally, discussing recent scientific developments during college interviews or incorporating them into your Statement of Purpose can demonstrate your passion and commitment to the field.
This article explores 8 awesome biology articles tailored for high school students!
1. Science Daily
Cost : Free
ScienceDaily offers biology news that explores the latest discoveries across the various subfields of biology. This resource provides updates on groundbreaking research, such as the use of RNA editing technologies for potentially lifesaving treatments for genetic diseases and insights into the complex interactions between hornets and plants, which challenge previous assumptions about pollination processes. Each article is supported by rigorous research and presented in a way that is accessible to readers with different levels of knowledge, making complex scientific information understandable and engaging.
For those particularly interested in marine biology, ScienceDaily also covers how climate change affects marine life, offering insights from recent studies about the resilience of marine species in increasingly acidic and warmer seawaters. It discusses innovative research methods like eDNA to monitor coral reef health and the roles of different fish behaviors in marine ecosystems.
These articles provide updates on current research and include expert commentary and context, helping bridge the gap between scientific discoveries and public knowledge. As a high school student, this resource is perfect for staying informed about the latest developments in the world of biology.
2. The National High School Journal of Science
The National High School Journal of Science (NHSJS) provides a wealth of articles that delve into cutting-edge biological research topics. Their coverage spans a wide range of subjects, from genome editing's implications in agriculture to the cognitive effects of nutrition, making it an excellent resource for students interested in the latest scientific developments. The NHSJS stands out not only for its focus on high-level scientific issues but also for its accessibility to high school students, encouraging them to engage with complex topics through peer-reviewed articles that are both informative and educational.
You can explore a variety of biological topics on NHSJS, such as the role of biophysical mechanisms in apoptosis and cancer pathogenesis or the connections between the amygdala and autism. Each article provides insights into current research and discussions, often linking to broader biological themes and current events in science, making it a great resource for students looking to deepen their understanding of biology and its real-world applications.
3. New Scientist
New Scientist's biology section offers a rich and diverse array of articles that cater to both enthusiasts and professionals in the field. With its focus on recent discoveries and research in cell biology, the publication sheds light on complex biological mechanisms and their implications in health, technology, and nature. For example, articles may cover innovative studies on how cellular processes are influenced by external factors like diet or explore the role of newly discovered cellular structures and their functions.
By presenting these complex topics in an accessible manner, New Scientist informs and engages its readers, making the intricate world of biology relatable and understandable.
4. Science Journal for Kids and Teens
Science Journal for Kids and Teens offers a treasure trove of resources that align perfectly with familiar educational standards such as NGSS, AP Environmental Science, and IB Biology, ensuring the material is engaging and academically relevant. This platform allows you to dive deep into a variety of scientific and social science topics that resonate with your studies and interests.
For those interested in biology, you can explore complex topics such as the impact of parenting on brain size, with materials tailored to different reading levels and available in audio format, complemented by lessons on birds and their brain structures. Within health and medicine, discover how cognitive biases affect vaccine choices through articles enhanced with audio and comprehensive lessons on vaccines. This resource helps you explore and understand complex topics through a multidimensional learning approach.
5. Scholastic Science World
Cost : $9 per student
Scholastic Science World immerses you in the dynamic world of science, delivering engaging news and hands-on activities across various scientific fields like biology, physics, chemistry, earth science, and engineering.
Beyond traditional reading, Science World enriches understanding through videos, interactive content, and a suite of digital teaching tools designed to bring complex scientific concepts to life.
With resources like the Digital Resource Guide, which includes lesson plans, skills sheets, and interactive Google Quizzes, learning becomes more engaging and interactive. Additionally, the platform is aligned with Common Core Reading and Writing Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), ensuring that the content is educationally robust.
Nature's Biological Sciences section is a premier source for groundbreaking research across all areas of biology. It offers detailed reports and research articles on the latest advancements in fields such as genetics, botany, and ecology . The publication is renowned for its rigorous peer-review process, ensuring that each piece of research is both credible and scientifically significant.
The articles typically explore a wide range of topics, from fundamental biological processes to innovative biotechnological applications. Whether you're interested in the latest developments in neurobiology or the evolutionary implications of newly discovered species, Nature provides comprehensive insights and in-depth analysis. For high school students keen on staying at the forefront of biological research and trends, Nature’s Biological Sciences section can be incredibly enlightening.
7. Scientific American
Digital: $39 per year
Print & Digital: $79 per year
Scientific American's Biology section provides a wide-ranging exploration of the latest trends and discoveries in the field of biology. This esteemed publication features accessible yet in-depth articles that cover a spectrum of biological topics, from evolutionary biology and genetics to biotechnology and environmental science . Each piece combines rigorous scientific analysis with engaging storytelling to bring complex concepts to a broad audience.
Whether you're a student, educator, or just curious, S cientific American makes cutting-edge research understandable and relevant, highlighting how biological findings impact our lives and the world around us. Regular updates ensure readers are always informed about the newest research and debates in the scientific community.
8. The Royal Society’s Biology Letters
Biology Letters, published by the Royal Society, delivers cutting-edge research across all branches of biology through a concise format. The journal emphasizes rapid publication of brief, innovative research papers and reviews that introduce new theoretical concepts, report groundbreaking findings, and discuss novel research methodologies.
Focusing on evolutionary biology, ecology, and environmental science, it caters to a wide scientific audience by offering quick dissemination of significant research findings. Ideal for keeping abreast of the latest developments, Biology Letters encourages interdisciplinary dialogue and is accessible to a broad range of biologists.
In addition to the research that is published, Biology Letters also publishes acclaimed review articles that are free to access for all!
If you’re looking for a competitive mentored research program in subjects like data science, machine learning, political theory, biology, and chemistry, consider applying to Horizon’s Research Seminars and Labs !
This is a selective virtual research program that lets you engage in advanced research and develop a research paper on a subject of your choosing. Horizon has worked with 1000+ high school students so far and offers 600+ research specializations for you to choose from.
You can find the application link here
One other option - Lumiere Research Scholar Program!
If you’re interested in pursuing research in biology, you could also consider applying to one of the Lumiere Research Scholar Programs , selective online high school programs for students founded with researchers at Harvard and Oxford. Last year, we had over 4000 students apply for 500 spots in the program! You can find the application form here .
Also check out the Lumiere Research Inclusion Foundation , a non-profit research program for talented, low-income students. Last year, we had 150 students on full need-based financial aid!
Stephen is one of the founders of Lumiere and a Harvard College graduate. He founded Lumiere as a Ph.D. student at Harvard Business School. Lumiere is a selective research program where students work 1-1 with a research mentor to develop an independent research paper.
Image Source: ScienceDaily logo
Where to Publish a Research Paper In High School: 18 Journals and Conferences to Consider
By Alex Yang
Graduate student at Southern Methodist University
9 minute read
So you've been working super hard writing a research paper , and you’ve finally finished. Congrats! It’s a very impressive accolade already, but you might still be wondering how to publish a research paper for students. As we’ve talked about before in our Polygence blog, “ Showcasing your work and sharing it with the world is the intellectual version of ‘pics or it didn’t happen.’ ” Of course, there are lot of different ways to showcase your work , from creating a YouTube video to making a podcast. But one of the most popular ways to showcase your research is to publish your research. Publishing your research can take the great work you’ve already done and add credibility to it, and will make a stronger impression than unpublished research. Further, the process of having your work reviewed by advanced degree researchers can be a valuable experience in itself. You can receive feedback from experts and learn how to improve upon the work you’ve already done.
Before we dive into the various reputable journals and conferences to publish your work, let’s distinguish between the various academic publishing options that you have as a high school student, as there are some nuances. Quick disclaimer: this article focuses on journals and conferences as ways to showcase your work. There are also competitions where you can submit your work, and we have written guides on competing in premier competitions like Regeneron STS and competing in Regeneron ISEF .
Publishing Options for High School Students
Peer-reviewed journals.
This is rather self-explanatory, but these journals go through the peer review process, where author(s) submit their work to the journal, and the journal's editors send the work to a group of independent experts (typically grad students or other scientists with advanced degrees) in the same field or discipline. These experts are peer reviewers, who evaluate the work based on a set of predetermined criteria, including the quality of the research, the validity of the methodology, the accuracy of the data, and the originality of the findings. The peer reviewers may suggest revisions or leave comments, but ultimately the editors will decide which suggestions to give to the student.
Once you’ve received suggestions, you have the opportunity to make revisions before submitting your final product back to the journal. The editor then decides whether or not your work is published.
Non-Peer-Reviewed Journals
These are just journals that do not undergo a review process. In general, peer-reviewed journals may be seen as more credible and prestigious. However, non-peer-reviewed journals may make it easier and faster to publish your work, which can be helpful if you are pressed for time and applying to colleges soon .
Pre Print Archives
Preprint archives or servers are online repositories where student researchers can upload and share their research papers without undergoing any review process. Preprints allow students to share their findings quickly and get feedback from the scientific community, which can help improve the research while you’re waiting to hear back from journals, which typically have longer timelines and can take up to several months to publish research. Sharing your work in a preprint archive does not prohibit you from, or interfere with submitting the same work to a journal afterwards.
Research Conferences
Prefer to present your research in a presentation or verbal format? Conferences can be a great way to “publish” your research, showcase your public speaking skills, speak directly to your audience, and network with other researchers in your field.
Student-led Journals vs Graduate Student / Professor-led Journals
Some student-led journals may have peer-review, but the actual people peer-reviewing your work may be high school students. Other journals will have graduate students, PhD students, or even faculty reviewing your work. As you can imagine, there are tradeoffs to either option. With an advanced degree student reviewing your work, you can likely expect better and more accurate feedback. Plus, it’s cool to have an expert look over your work! However, this may also mean that the journal is more selective, whereas student-led journals may be easier to publish in. Nonetheless, getting feedback from anyone who’s knowledgeable can be a great way to polish your research and writing.
Strategy for Submitting to Multiple Journals
Ultimately, your paper can only be published in one peer-reviewed journal. Submitting the same paper to multiple peer-reviewed journals at the same time is not allowed, and doing so may impact its publication at any peer-reviewed journal. If your work is not accepted at one journal, however, then you are free to submit that work to your next choice and so on. Therefore, it is best to submit to journals with a strategy in mind. Consider: what journal do I ideally want to be published in? What are some back-ups if I don’t get published in my ideal journal? Preprints, like arXiv and the Research Archive of Rising Scholars, are possible places to submit your work in advance of seeking peer-reviewed publication. These are places to “stake your claim” in a research area and get feedback from the community prior to submitting your paper to its final home in a peer-reviewed journal. You can submit your work to a preprint prior to submitting at a peer-reviewed journal. However, bioRxiv, a reputable preprint server, recommends on their website that a preprint only be posted on one server, so that’s something to keep in mind as well.
Citation and Paper Formats
All of the journals listed below have specific ways that they’d like you to cite your sources, varying from styles like MLA to APA, and it’s important that you double-check the journal’s requirements for citations, titling your paper, writing your abstract, etc. Most journal websites have very detailed guides for how they want you to format your paper, so follow those closely to avoid having to wait to hear back and then resubmit your paper. If you’re looking for more guidance on citations and bibliographies check out our blog post!
18 Journals and Conferences to Publish Your Research as a High Schooler
Now that we’ve distinguished the differences between certain journals and conferences, let’s jump into some of our favorite ones. We’ve divided up our selections based on prestige and reliability, and we’ve made these selections using our experience with helping Polygence students showcase their research .
Most Prestigious Journals
Concord review.
Cost: $70 to Submit and $200 Publication Cost (if accepted)
Deadline: Fixed Deadlines in Feb 1 (Summer Issue), May 1 (Fall), August 1 (Winter), and November 1 (Spring)
Subject area: History / Social Sciences
Type of research: All types of academic articles
The Concord Review is a quarterly journal that publishes exceptional essays written by high school students on historical topics. The journal has been around since 1987 and has a great reputation, with many student winners going to great universities. Further, if your paper is published, your essays will be sent to subscribers and teachers all around the world, which is an incredible achievement.
Papers submitted tend to be around 8,000 words, so there is definitely a lot of writing involved, and the Concord Review themselves say that they are very selective, publishing only about 5% of the essays they receive.
We’ve posted our complete guide on publishing in the Concord Review here.
Journal of Emerging Investigators (JEI)
Deadline: Rolling
Subject area: STEM
Type of research: Original hypothesis-driven scientific research
JEI is an open-access publication that features scientific research papers written by middle and high school students in the fields of biological and physical sciences. The journal includes a comprehensive peer-review process, where graduate students and other professional scientists with advanced degrees will review the manuscripts and provide suggestions to improve both the project and manuscript itself. You can expect to receive feedback in 6-8 weeks.
This should be the go-to option for students that are doing hypothesis-driven, original research or research that involves original analyses of existing data (meta-analysis, analyzing publicly available datasets, etc.). This is not an appropriate fit for students writing literature reviews. Finally, a mentor or parent must submit on behalf of the student.
We’ve had many Polygence students successfully submit to JEI. Check out Hana’s research on invasive species and their effects in drought times.
STEM Fellowship Journal (SFJ)
Cost: $400 publication fee
Subject area: All Scientific Disciplines
Type of research: Conference Proceedings, Review Articles, Viewpoint Articles, Original Research
SFJ is a peer-reviewed journal published by Canadian Science Publishing that serves as a platform for scholarly research conducted by high school and university students in the STEM fields. Peer review is conducted by undergraduate, graduate student, and professional reviewers.
Depending on the kind of research article you choose to submit, SFJ provides very specific guidelines on what to include and word limits.
Other Great Journal Options
National high school journal of science (nhsjs).
Cost: $250 for publication
Deadline: Rolling
Subject area: All science disciplines
Type of research: Original research, literature review
NHSJS is a journal peer reviewed by high schoolers from around the world, with an advisory board of adult academics. Topics are STEM related, and submission types can vary from original research papers to shorter articles.
Curieux Academic Journal
Cost: $185-215
Subject area: Engineering, Humanities, and Natural Science, Mathematics, and Social Science
Type of research: Including but not limited to research papers, review articles, and humanity/social science pieces.
Curieux Academic Journal is a non-profit run by students and was founded in 2017 to publish outstanding research by high school and middle school students. Curieux publishes one issue per month (twelve per year), so there are many opportunities to get your research published.
The Young Scientists Journal
Deadline: December
Subject area: Sciences
Type of research: Original research, literature review, blog post
The Young Scientists Journal , while a popular option for students previously, has paused submissions to process a backlog. The journal is an international peer-reviewed journal run by students, and creates print issues twice a year.
The journal has also been around for a decade and has a clear track record of producing alumni who go on to work in STEM.
Here’s an example of research submitted by Polygence student Ryan to the journal.
Journal of Research High School (JRHS)
Subject area: Any academic subject including the sciences and humanities
Type of research: Original research and significant literature reviews.
JRHS is an online research journal edited by volunteer professional scientists, researchers, teachers, and professors. JRHS accepts original research and significant literature reviews in Engineering, Humanities, Natural Science, Math, and Social Sciences.
From our experience working with our students to help publish their research, this journal is currently operating with a 15-20 week turnaround time for review. This is a bit on the longer side, so be mindful of this turnaround time if you’re looking to get your work published soon.
Youth Medical Journal
Deadline: March (currently closed)
Subject area: Medical or scientific topics
Type of research: Original research, review article, blog post, magazine article
The Youth Medical Journal is an international, student-run team of 40 students looking to share medical research.
We’ve found that this journal is a good entry point for students new to research papers, but when submissions are busy, in the past they have paused submissions.
Journal of High School Science (JHSS)
Subject area: All topics
Type of research: Original research, literature review, technical notes, opinion pieces
This peer-reviewed STEAM journal publishes quarterly, with advanced degree doctors who sit on the journal’s editorial board. In addition to typical STEM subjects, the journal also accepts manuscripts related to music and theater, which is explicitly stated on their website.
Due to the current large volume of submissions, the review process takes a minimum of 4 weeks from the time of submission.
Whitman Journal of Psychology
Subject area: Psychology
Type of research: Original research, podcasts
The WWJOP is a publication run entirely by students, where research and literature reviews in the field of psychology are recognized. The journal is run out of a high school with a teacher supervisor and student staff.
The WWJOP uniquely also accepts podcast submissions, so if that’s your preferred format for showcasing your work, then this could be the journal for you!
Cost: $180 submission fee
Subject area: Humanities
Type of research: Essay submission
The Schola is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that showcases essays on various humanities and social sciences topics authored by high school students worldwide. They feature a diverse range of subjects such as philosophy, history, art history, English, economics, public policy, and sociology.
Editors at Schola are academics who teach and do research in the humanities and social sciences
Critical Debates in Humanities, Science and Global Justice
Cost: $10 author fee
Subject area: Ethics and frontiers of science, Biology and ecosystems, Technology and Innovation, Medical research and disease, Peace and civil society, Global citizenship, identity and democracy, Structural violence and society, Psychology, Education, AI, Sociology, Computer Science, Neuroscience, Cultural politics, Politics and Justice, Computer science and math as related to policy, Public policy, Human rights, Language, Identity and Culture, Art and activism
Critical Debates is an international academic journal for critical discourse in humanities, science and contemporary global issues for emerging young scholars
International Youth Neuroscience Association Journal
Subject area: Neuroscience
Type of research: Research papers
Although this student peer-reviewed journal is not currently accepting submissions, we’ve had students recently publish here.
Here’s an example of Nevenka’s research that was published in the November 2022 issue of the journal.
Preprint Archives to Share Your Work In
Subject area: STEM, Quantitative Finance, Economics
arXiv is an open access archive supported by Cornell University, where more than 2 million scholarly articles in a wide variety of topics have been compiled. arXiv articles are not peer-reviewed, so you will not receive any feedback on your work from experts. However, your article does go through a moderation process where your work is classified into a topic area and checked for scholarly value. This process is rather quick however and according to arXiv you can expect your article to be available on the website in about 6 hours.
Although there’s no peer review process, that means the submission standards are not as rigorous and you can get your article posted very quickly, so submitting to arXiv or other preprint archives can be something you do before trying to get published in a journal.
One slight inconvenience of submitting to arXiv is that you must be endorsed by a current arXiv author, which can typically be a mentor or teacher or professor that you have. Here’s an example of a Polygence student submitting their work to arXiv, with Albert’s research on Hamiltonian Cycles.
Subject area: Biology
Type of research: Original research
bioRxiv is a preprint server for biology research, where again the research is not peer-reviewed but undergoes a check to make sure that the material is relevant and appropriate.
bioRxiv has a bit of a longer posting time, taking around 48 hours, but that’s still very quick. bioRxiv also allows for you to submit revised versions of your research if you decide to make changes.
Research Archive of Rising Scholars (RARS)
Subject area: STEM and Humanities
Type of research: Original research, review articles, poems, short stories, scripts
Research Archive of Rising Scholars is Polygence’s own preprint server! We were inspired by arXiv so we created a repository for articles and other creative submissions in STEM and the Humanities.
We launched RARS in 2022 and we’re excited to offer a space for budding scholars as they look to publish their work in journals. Compared to other preprint archives, RARS also accepts a wider range of submission types, including poems, short stories, and scripts.
Conferences to Participate In
Symposium of rising scholars.
Deadline: Twice a year - February and July
Polygence’s very own Symposium of Rising Scholars is a bi-annual academic conference where students present and share their research with their peers and experts. The Symposium also includes a College Admissions Panel and Keynote Speech. In our 8th edition of the Symposium this past March, we had 60 students presenting live, approximately 70 students presenting asynchronously, and over 100 audience members. The keynote speaker was Chang-rae Lee, award-winning novelist and professor at Stanford University.
We’re looking to have our 9th Symposium in Fall of 2023, and you can express your interest now. If you’re interested to see what our Polygence scholars have presented in the past for the Symposium, you can check out their scholar pages here.
Junior Science and Humanities Symposium (JSHS)
Deadline: Typically in November, so for 2024’s competition look to submit in Fall 2023
Subject area: STEM topics
JSHS is a Department of Defense sponsored program and competition that consists of first submitting a written report of your research. If your submission is selected, you’ll be able to participate in the regional symposium, where you can present in oral format or poster format. A select group from the regional symposium will then qualify for the national symposium.
One of the great things about JSHS compared to the journals mentioned above is that you’re allowed to work in teams and you don’t have to be a solo author. This can make the experience more fun for you and your teammates, and allow you to combine your strengths for your submission.
For young writers undertaking a high school research project and understanding how to publish a research paper for students is crucial. Knowing how to identify the right research question and understanding where to publish your research paper are key steps in this journey.
Related Content:
Top 8 Business Journals to Publish Your Research
Why Teens Should Attend the National Student Leadership Conference (NSLC)
How to Brainstorm Your Way to Perfect Research Topic Ideas
Top 20 Most Competitive Summer Programs for High School Students
Research Opportunities for High School Students
Want to start a project of your own?
Click below to get matched with one of our expert mentors who can help take your project off the ground!
Writing on Social Media: a Review of Research in the High School Classroom
- Original Paper
- Published: 09 September 2019
- Volume 64 , pages 57–69, ( 2020 )
Cite this article
- Sarah Galvin ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2015-9946 1 &
- Christine Greenhow 1
3810 Accesses
25 Citations
26 Altmetric
Explore all metrics
Students today spend more time writing on social media than they do in formal classrooms and have developed distinct and complex literacies separate from traditional writing curricula. Although several studies have explored teens’ informal literacy practices online, research investigating how these spaces may inform or be effectively utilized in the classroom remains inconclusive. This systematic literature review identifies and critically evaluates the existing knowledge base on how social media have been integrated in high school writing instruction, with particular emphasis on which factors improved student learning and which factors created barriers to student learning. Social media platforms were found to be potentially authentic learning spaces, yet sometimes low student participation hindered effective implementation. Specific teaching strategies, such as modeling and scaffolding instruction, and directions for future research are described.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save.
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
Similar content being viewed by others
Toward Social Media Based Writing
Social Media-Based Language Learning: Insights from Research and Practice
Writing in the secondary-level disciplines: a systematic review of context, cognition, and content, explore related subjects.
- Artificial Intelligence
- Digital Education and Educational Technology
Adams Becker, S., Pasquini, L. A., & Zentner, A. (2017). 2017 digital literacy impact study: An NMC horizon project strategic brief. The New Media Consortium, 3 , 5.
Google Scholar
Alghasab, M., & Handley, Z. (2017). Capturing (non-)collaboration in wiki-mediated collaborative writing activities: The need to examine discussion posts and editing acts in tandem. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30 (7), 664–691.
Alvermann, D. E. (2008). Why bother theorizing adolescents’ online literacies for classroom practice and research? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52 (1), 8–19.
American Educational Research Association (AERA). (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35 (6), 33–40.
Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media & technology 2018 . Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. Retrieved August 30, 2019 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/ .
Annamalai, N., & Tan, K. E. (2015). Exploring two teachers’ engagement with their students in an online writing environment. The EUROCALL Review, 23 (2), 58–73.
Annamalai, N., Eng, T. K., Abdullah, A., & Sivagurunathan, S. (2015). Exploring the interactions on an online narrative writing platform. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 12 , 103–129.
Batsila, M., & Tsihouridis, C. (2016). “Once upon a time there was. . .” A digital world for junior high school learners. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11 (3), 42–50.
Black, R. W. (2009). English-language learners, fan communities, and 21st-century skills. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52 (8), 688–697.
Canella, G. (2017). Social movement documentary practices: Digital storytelling, social media and organizing. Digital Creativity, 28 (1), 24–37.
Challob, A. I., Bakar, N. A., & Latif, H. (2016). Collaborative blended learning writing environment: Effects on EFL students’ writing apprehension and writing performance. English Language Teaching, 9 (6), 229–241.
Chang, B., & Lu, F. (2018). Social media facilitated English prewriting activity design and evaluation. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27 (1), 33–42.
Chen, H. I. (2013). Identity practices of multilingual writers in social networking spaces. Language Learning & Technology, 17 (2), 143–170.
Chen, L., Ho, S. S., & Lwin, M. O. (2016). A meta-analysis of factors predicting cyberbullying perpetuation and victimization: From the social cognitive and media effects approach. New Media & Society, 19 , 1194–1213.
Chromey, K. J., Duchsherer, A., Pruett, J., & Vareberg, K. (2016). Double-edged sword: Social media use in the classroom. Educational Media International, 53 (1), 1–12.
Chu, S. K. W., Capio, C. M., van Aalst, J. C. W., & Cheng, E. W. L. (2017). Evaluating the use of social media tool for collaborative group writing of secondary school students in Hong Kong. Computers & Education, 110 , 170–180.
Chugh, R., & Ruhi, U. (2018). Social media in higher education: A literature review of Facebook. Education and Information Technologies, 23 , 605–616.
Curwood, J., Magnifico, A., & Lammers, J. (2013). Writing in the wild: Writers’ motivation in fan-based affinity spaces. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56 (8), 677–685.
Davies, J. (2012). Facework on Facebook as a new literacy practice. Computers & Education, 59 , 19–29.
Demirbilek, M., & Talan, T. (2018). The effect of social media multitasking on classroom performance. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19 (2), 117–129.
Ellison, N. B., & Boyd, D. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of internet studies (pp. 151–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Froldova, V. (2016). Paper-pen peer-correction versus wiki-based peer correction. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 4 (1), 140–153.
Fullwood, C., James, B. M., & Chen-Wilson, C. (2016). Self-concept clarity and online self-presentation in adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 19 (12), 716–720.
Gee, J. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies . New York, NY: Routledge.
Giunchiglia, F., Zeni, M., Gobbi, E., Bignotti, E., & Bison, I. (2018). Mobile social media usage and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 82 , 177–185.
Gleason, B. (2018). Thinking in hashtags: Exploring teenagers’ new literacies practices on twitter, Learning . Media and Technology, 43 (2), 165–180.
Glesne, C. (2016). Becoming qualitative researchers (5th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
Greenhow, C. & Robelia, E. (2009a) Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34 (2), 119–140.
Greenhow, C. & Robelia, E. (2009b). Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 14 , 1130–1161.
Greenhow, C. & Gleason, B. (2012). Twitteracy: Tweeting as a new literacy practice. The Educational Forum, 76 , 463–477.
Greenhow, C. & Askari, E. (2017). Learning and teaching with social network sites: A decade of research in K-12 related education. Education and Information Technologies, 22 (2), 623–645.
Greenhow, C., Robelia, E., & Hughes, J. (2009). Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38 (4), 246–259.
Greenhow, C., Menzer, M. & Gibbins, T. (2015). Re-thinking scientific literacy: Arguing science issues in a niche facebook application. Computers & Human Behavior, 53 , 593–604.
Hu, X., Cheong, C. W., & Chu, S. K.-W. (2018). Developing a multidimensional framework for analyzing student comments in wikis. Educational Technology & Society, 21 (4), 26–38.
Humphreys, A. (2016). Social Media . New York: Oxford University Press.
Itō, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., et al. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media . Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Kelly, Y., Zilanawala, A., Booker, C., & Sacker, A. (2018). Social media use and adolescent mental health: Findings from the UK millennium cohort study. EClinicalMedicine, 6 , 59–68.
Kidd, T. T., & Carpenter, B. S. (2014). Rethinking educational spaces: A review of literature on urban youth and social media. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 23 (2), 189–208.
Lam, Y. W., Hew, K. F., & Chiu, K. F. (2018). Improving argumentative writing: Effects of blended learning approach and gamification. Language Learning & Technology, 22 (1), 97–118.
Lammers, J. C., & Marsh, V. L. (2015). Going public: An adolescent’s networked writing on Fanfiction.net. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59 (3), 277–285.
Levy, B. L., Journell, W., He, Y., & Towns, B. (2015). Students blogging about politics: A study of students’ political engagement and a teacher’s pedagogy during a semester-long political blog assignment. Computers & Education, 88 , 64–71.
Majid, A. H. A., & Stapa, S. H. (2017). The use of scaffolding technique via Facebook in improving descriptive writing among ESL learners. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 23 (4), 77–88.
Manca, S., & Grion, V. (2017). Engaging students in school participatory practice through Facebook: The story of a failure. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48 , 1153–1163.
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2013). Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 29 (6), 487–504.
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Is Facebook still a suitable technology-enhanced learning environment? An updated critical review of the literature from 2012 to 2015. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32 (6), 503–528.
Matzat, U., & Vrieling, E. M. (2016). Self-regulated learning and social media – A ‘natural alliance’? Evidence on students’ self-regulation of learning, social media use, and student–teacher relationship. Learning, Media and Technology, 41 (1), 73–99.
Mihailidis, P. (2018). Civic media literacies: Re-imagining engagement for civic intentionality. Learning, Media and Technology, 43 (2), 152–164.
Mills, K. A. (2010). A review of the “digital turn” in the new literacy studies. Review of Educational Review, 80 , 246–271.
Mirra, N., & Garcia, A. (2017). Civic participation reimagined: Youth interrogation and innovation in the multimodal public sphere. Review of Research in Education, 41 (1), 136–158.
Mohammad, M., Ghazali, N., & Hasim, H. (2018). Secondary school students’ perceptions on the use of Google+ towards improving ESL writing skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13 (9), 224–238.
Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D. G & The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Public Library of Science Medicine, 6 (7).
Nikitkov, A., & Sainty, B. (2014). The role of social media in influencing career success. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 22 (4), 273–294.
Padgett, E. R., & Curwood, J. S. (2016). A figment of their imagination: Adolescent poetic literacy in an online affinity space. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59 (4), 397–407.
Rehm, M., Manca, S., Brandon, C., Greenhow, C. (2019). Beyond disciplinary boundaries: Mapping educational science in the discourse on social media. Teachers College Record, 121 (14). Available online first at: https://www.tcrecord.org . Accessed 9/3/2019.
Rideout, V., & Robb, M. B. (2018). Social media, social life: Teens reveal their experiences . San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media. Retrieved August 30, 2019 from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/uploads/research/2018_cs_socialmediasociallife_fullreport-final-release_2_lowres.pdf .
Rutten, M., Ros, A., Kuijpers, M., & Kreijns, K. (2016). Usefulness of social network sites for adolescents’ development of online career skills. Educational Technology & Society, 19 (4), 140–150.
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Saunders, J. M., Ash, G. E., Salazar, I., Pruitt, R., Wallach, D., Breed, E., et al. (2017). “We’re already somebody”: High school students’ practicing critical media literacy IRL (in real life). Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60 , 515–526.
Sormunen, E., Tanni, M., & Alamettälä, T. (2014). Students’ group work strategies in source-based writing assignments. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65 (6), 1217–1231.
Stewart, O. G. (2015). A critical review of the literature of social media’s affordances in the classroom. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12 , 481–501.
Stoddart, A., Chan, J. Y., & Liu, G. (2016). Enhancing successful outcomes of wiki-based collaborative writing: A state-of-the-art review of facilitation frameworks. Interactive Learning Environments, 24 (1), 142–157.
Street, B. (2003). What's "new" in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5 (2), 77–91.
Street, B. (2009). Multiple literacies and multiliteracies. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, & M. Nystrand (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of writing development (pp. 137–150). London: SAGE.
Tess, P. A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)—A literature review. Computers in Education, 29 , A60–A68.
Vie, S. (2015). What’s going on?: Challenges and opportunities for social media use in the writing classroom. Journal of Faculty Development, 29 (2), 33–44.
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Michigan State University, 513C Erickson Hall, 62 Farm Lane, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
Sarah Galvin & Christine Greenhow
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Sarah Galvin .
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Galvin, S., Greenhow, C. Writing on Social Media: a Review of Research in the High School Classroom. TechTrends 64 , 57–69 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00428-9
Download citation
Published : 09 September 2019
Issue Date : January 2020
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00428-9
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Digital literacy
- High school students
- Secondary education
- Social media
- Find a journal
- Publish with us
- Track your research
- Share full article
Advertisement
There have been three mass shootings in the U.S. this year.
Here is how The New York Times tallies this type of shooting.
By Adeel Hassan
- Sept. 5, 2024
The shooting at a high school in Winder, Ga., in which a gunman killed two teachers and two students, and wounded nine more people was the third mass shooting in the United States this year. It is also the deadliest school shooting in Georgia’s history.
The most recent mass shooting happened in Chicago over Labor Day weekend. Four people were killed in each of the two earlier attacks.
By The New York Times’s count, a mass shooting has occurred when four or more people — not including the shooter — have been killed by gunfire in a public place, and no other crime is involved. Our count of mass shootings is based on data from both the Gun Violence Archive and the Violence Project. We use data from both sources in order to make sure our database is as current and comprehensive as possible.
Mass shootings since 1999
Incidents where four or more people were killed in a public place and not connected to another crime.
Here are the other mass shootings that have occurred in the United States this year:
Fordyce, Ark. : A gunman killed four people and wounded nine on June 21 at the Mad Butcher grocery store in a town of 3,400 people, about 70 miles south of Little Rock. Two police officers were injured in the attack, and the shooter was also wounded.
Forest Park, Ill. : A man fatally shot four passengers on Monday as they slept on an L train in the Chicago suburb, according to the authorities.
Adeel Hassan is a reporter and editor on the National Desk. He is a founding member of Race/Related , and much of his work focuses on identity and discrimination. He started the Morning Briefing for NYT Now and was its inaugural writer. He also served as an editor on the International Desk. More about Adeel Hassan
- WordPress.org
- Documentation
- Learn WordPress
- Members Newsfeed
23 Review Activities for High School: Engaging Students in Learning
- High School
With the ongoing academic challenges, finding creative ways to engage high school students in the review process is essential. The following 23 review activities aim to help educators enhance subject retention and create an engaging learning environment.
1.Jeopardy: Create a classroom version of this popular game show, using questions related to the lesson or subject.
2.Flashcards: Have students create flashcards with key terms, concepts or questions, and then partner with classmates to review.
3.Peer Teaching: Assign students in pairs or small groups to teach a specific topic or concept to their peers.
4.Mind Maps: Encourage students to create mind maps detailing connections between various concepts in the subject matter.
5.Round Robin: Have students form a circle and take turns summarizing key points from the lesson.
6.Trivia Tournament: Organize a trivia contest featuring questions about material covered in class.
7.Group Debate: Break the class into groups and assign opposing sides of an issue related to the lesson. Allow time for preparation before hosting a debate.
8.Journal Reflections: Ask students to write about how they feel about a particular lesson, what they learned, and where they can improve.
9.Speed Dating Style Reviews: Divide students into two lines facing each other. Assign a topic for discussion and rotate partners after one minute.
10.Concept Posters: Have students design posters that illustrate specific concepts or lessons taught in class.
11.Silent Gallery Walk: Hang student-created concept posters around the room and allow them to quietly walk around and take notes on their classmates’ ideas.
12.Exit Ticket: Before departing class, require students to write down one thing they learned and one question they have about the material covered in that session.
13.Bingo Review Game: Create bingo cards filled with key terms or questions from the lesson, then call out definitions or answers, prompting students to mark their cards accordingly.
14.Jigsaw: Divide the class into groups, assign a specific topic to each group, and have them research and present their findings to the class.
15.Pop Quiz Relay: Organize students into teams. Ask questions that require the team to work together to answer correctly in a relay race format.
16.Memory Chain: Have students stand in a line and challenge them to repeat important points made earlier by the teacher or classmates by building on what the person before them said.
17.Slam Dunk Summary: Instruct students to write a concise summary of the lesson using only ten words or less.
18.Comic Strip Review: Encourage creativity by inviting students to create a comic strip summarizing the main points of a lesson.
19.Four Corners Game: Label each corner of the room with answer choices (A, B, C, D) and ask students multiple-choice questions, prompting them to move to their chosen answers.
20.Kahoot! Quiz: Use online tools like Kahoot! for engaging review quizzes.
21.Skits: Assign small groups different topics from the material being reviewed and have them produce skits depicting key concepts.
22.Speed Quizzing: Conduct rapid-fire questioning rounds where students compete for points based on speed and accuracy of responses.
23.Thumbs Up/Thumbs Down: As you discuss key concepts from your lessons, ask students to give a thumbs up or down depending on their understanding of each concept.
Incorporating these fun review activities into your high school curriculum can lead to more engaged learners and improved academic performance. Be sure to diversify these activities so that every student’s learning style is catered to for maximum effectiveness.
Related Articles
Literature forms an essential part of a high school education, helping students…
Introduction: Choosing a future career is undoubtedly a daunting task for teenagers.…
Introduction: Teaching high school students can be both challenging and rewarding. To…
Pedagogue is a social media network where educators can learn and grow. It's a safe space where they can share advice, strategies, tools, hacks, resources, etc., and work together to improve their teaching skills and the academic performance of the students in their charge.
If you want to collaborate with educators from around the globe, facilitate remote learning, etc., sign up for a free account today and start making connections.
Pedagogue is Free Now, and Free Forever!
- New? Start Here
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Registration
Don't you have an account? Register Now! it's really simple and you can start enjoying all the benefits!
We just sent you an Email. Please Open it up to activate your account.
I allow this website to collect and store submitted data.
- Skip to main content
- Keyboard shortcuts for audio player
Planet Money
- Planet Money Podcast
- The Indicator Podcast
- Planet Money Newsletter Archive
- Planet Money Summer School
- LISTEN & FOLLOW
- Apple Podcasts
- Amazon Music
Your support helps make our show possible and unlocks access to our sponsor-free feed.
What can we learn from millions of high school yearbook photos?
Sofia Shchukina
Imagine you’re about to get your high school yearbook picture taken and you really want to stand out. What would you wear to distinguish yourself from your classmates? Would bright pink lipstick, a cartoon print tie, or a blue steel pout do the trick? Perhaps all of those things in combination?
Economists can now answer this question using AI – and not only for you, but for every single person who graduated high school between 1930 and 2010!
In a recent paper titled " Image(s) ," economists Hans-Joachim Voth and David Yanagizawa-Drott analyzed 14.5 million high school yearbook photos from all over the U.S. Their AI tool categorized each photo based on what people were wearing in it, like “suit”, “necklace”, or “glasses.” The researchers then used the AI outputs to analyze how fashion had changed over time.
Images have been used to study fashion before, but researchers have rarely been able to process so many photos and also classify them by the items of clothing worn in one go. By doing so, Voth and Yanagizawa-Drott have accomplished something no one has before: a comprehensive, data-driven analysis of the evolution of style, at least for graduating American high schoolers. The breadth of their data allowed them to document many different trends, some of which we already knew about, but also some that were really quite surprising.
An economist’s guide to fashion
So how did yearbook fashion evolve over time? If you were a yearbook photographer working in the 1950s, you would have taken picture after picture of clean-shaven young men in suits and ties with neatly trimmed hair. Young women were less predictable: many were starting to experiment with jewelry, short haircuts, and low necklines.
Fast-forward to the 1970s, and we land in a completely different fashion era. Young men become more adventurous with their clothing choices. Some grow their hair long, others don bow-ties or necklaces. Many young women opt for long hippie-style hair, and earrings start becoming more popular.
Among the fashion innovators of the time was Steve Jobs, who opted for a tux, bow tie, and long hair for his yearbook photo (yes, his photo was part of the study’s sample!). This look had rarely appeared in yearbook pictures before Jobs, but became popular soon after he wore it.
These fashion insights aren’t entirely novel, but rediscovering them with this new AI tool was important. By confirming things we already suspected to be true, like the fact that most young men opted for similar straight-laced looks for their yearbook photos in the fifties (suit, tie, collared shirt, short hair, no glasses, no jewelry, no facial hair), or the radical shift in fashion during the counterculture movement in the late sixties, Voth and Yanagizawa-Drott were able to show that their AI tool was correctly calibrated. Next, they moved onto documenting undiscovered patterns.
One style trait they studied was individualism: how much each student’s style differed from that of their classmates. They found that, in the thirties, young women were much more likely to dress differently from their peers relative to young men. But over time, this pattern switched. Young men started dressing in ways that made them stand out from their classmates more often, and young women did so less often. By the 2010s, men’s styles were more individualistic than women’s.
The opposite trend happened for persistence, another style trait the economists studied. Persistence measured how similarly each student dressed compared to people who had graduated from their high school 20 years ago. In the thirties, young men were considerably more likely to dress like their dads had for their yearbook photos, but by the 2010s it was young women who were more likely to dress like their moms.
The paper doesn’t explain why these shifts happened because you can’t really infer that from the data. But the authors provided us with some of their guesses. One reason could have been that it became more socially acceptable for men to experiment with fashion, which increased individualism. At the same time, women were entering the labor force in greater numbers and becoming more financially independent, which perhaps made it less important for young women to dress in ways that made them stand out to attract potential partners.
Another interesting discovery was how styles evolved in different regions. In the fifties, individualism and persistence were similar all over the country. That’s not to say that everyone was dressing the same, but rather that high school seniors were just as likely to stand out from their classmates or to dress like their parents did regardless of whether they were from New York, Alabama, or Texas.
But this began to change during the seventies. Generally speaking, high school seniors in the North became much more likely to dress differently from both their classmates and their parents than high school seniors in the South. They were also more likely to be style innovators, wearing looks that no one had seen before. By the nineties, levels of individualism and persistence in the North and South were completely different. These trends seemed to align with the political leanings of the regions (a more liberal North, a more conservative South), though the paper didn’t mention this correlation.
The economics of culture
“How is this economics?” is a question you might be wondering. What could fashion trends possibly tell us about the economy?
It turns out that they can tell us a lot. There’s a long tradition of economics turning to fashion analysis going back over a century. Economists have come up with concepts like the “snob effect” (when high demand for a product makes it appear less elite) and a “Veblen good” (when a high price tag makes a product appear prestigious, and therefore more desirable) to explain surprising purchase patterns, and have even created mathematical models to understand how fashion cycles work (for more on Veblen goods, listen to this episode of Planet Money ).
In fact, the economic analysis of fashion often falls into a broader subfield of economics called cultural economics, which looks at the relationship between culture and economic outcomes. Since culture is notoriously difficult to define, cultural economists ended up studying everything from fashion and media to technology and institutions to social norms and values like trust and competitiveness.
For instance, one of the most surprising findings in this field came from a study which found that modern gender norms might have been influenced by the adoption of the plow . Plows are heavy and require much more strength to use than other early farming instruments like hoes and digging sticks. So, in societies that used the plow, men had a natural advantage in farmwork. This contributed to a gendered division of labor – men started disproportionately working in the fields while women worked in the home. And this division of labor in turn influenced beliefs about the appropriate roles of men and women in society.
By contrast, this didn’t happen as much in societies which didn’t adopt the plow. Men had no natural advantage in using other farming tools, so everyone there was involved in farmwork. There was no reason to think of work outside the home as “men’s work”, so gender norms regarding work developed differently too. Amazingly, economists found that these historical differences affect gender norms to this day. It turns out that societies that did not adopt the plow still have higher gender equality and higher female labor force participation!
A new frontier for economics
Returning to our original paper, what can we learn from millions of high school yearbook photos? To start, Voth and Yanagizawa-Drott’s paper shows the potential of using images to study how culture changes. Turning photos into a huge dataset that covers the entire country allows us to precisely track where change starts, how it spreads, and which communities resist it. Voth and Yanagizawa-Drott’s analysis gave us a new way of studying the counterculture movement of the sixties, for instance.
But mostly, we’re still just beginning to understand what we can learn from this work. Image(s) provided a proof-of-concept: it showed that it is possible to turn images into data by having AI identify different elements within each picture. And proof-of-concept studies tend to open more doors than they close.
Perhaps future research will be able to connect the stylistic shifts which Voth and Yanagizawa-Drott discovered to specific social, political, or economic developments and arrive at a better understanding of our history. Perhaps there will be commercial interest in such approaches, which could allow fashion brands to learn more about what people are wearing than they were ever able to know before. And it’s also likely that researchers will apply this method to study many other questions in cultural economics and other fields.
One thing is clear, however: as the number of images we see and interact with each day grows exponentially larger (thanks to the usual culprits – social media and the ever-expanding number of screens that we use all the time), our ability to learn from those images will increase too. It remains to be seen what else we might discover.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Start your review by referring to the title and author of the article, the title of the journal, and the year of publication in the first paragraph. For example: The article, "Condom use will increase the spread of AIDS," was written by Anthony Zimmerman, a Catholic priest. 4. Write the introduction.
Article Review vs. Response Paper . Now, let's consider the difference between an article review and a response paper: If you're assigned to critique a scholarly article, you will need to compose an article review.; If your subject of analysis is a popular article, you can respond to it with a well-crafted response paper.; The reason for such distinctions is the quality and structure of ...
A review article is a type of professional paper writing that demands a high level of in-depth analysis and a well-structured presentation of arguments. It is a critical, constructive evaluation of literature in a particular field through summary, classification, analysis, and comparison. ... The report "Poverty increases school drop-outs" was ...
Read the Article Thoroughly. The first step in writing an article review is to read the article carefully and thoroughly. This may seem obvious, but it is crucial to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the work before attempting to critique it. During the initial reading, focus on grasping the main arguments, key points, and the overall ...
Aspinwall was also the defensive coordinator for the high school football team, an old-style football coach who loved his wife, daughters, students and football, according to the head coach. WHAT WE DON'T KNOW: Just as we don't know a motive for the shootings, it's not known if the shooter targeted the victims or it was merely chance.
Related article Georgia high school shooting suspect referenced Parkland massacre in writings found in his bedroom, source says. David Phenix, one of the injured teachers who was shot in the foot ...
The teen suspected in the deadly mass shooting at a Georgia high school and his father had initial hearings in court Friday morning. Follow for live news updates.
This article presents a detailed guide for high school through graduate level instructors that leads students to write effective and well-organized scientific papers. Interesting research emerges from the ability to ask questions, define problems, design experiments, analyze and interpret data, and make critical connections.
How to Write an Article Review - Lesson
Here are the basic steps you need to take: Analyze the article. You won't be able to learn how to write a article review unless you are willing to read the article. During this step, you have to analyze the positive aspects of the paper and identify all the contradictions, inconsistencies and gaps left by the author.
Lyela Sayarath was in her second period Algebra 1 class in Winder, Georgia, Wednesday morning when the quiet boy sitting next to her got up and left the class, the door closing and automatically ...
In another case of deadly gunfire at a school, the victim, a 15-year-old student, was airlifted to a trauma center, where he later died. A 16-year-old suspect was in custody on Friday.
WINDER, Ga. - The teen suspected in the shooting at Apalachee High School and his father both appeared in court on Friday in connection with charges related to the attack that killed four people ...
(PDF) Article review writing format, steps, examples and ...
This blank worksheet is for students to complete based on articles they have read. There are sections for both a summary and a critique. Learning to review published articles is a valuable skill for students for several reasons. Critical Thinking: Reviewing articles requires students to think critically and evaluate the quality and credibility ...
Asbestos leak disrupts return to class at Laval, Que., high school; Changing school start and end time could address school bus issues, report says; Province announces 800 new seats for Surrey ...
As a high school student, this resource is perfect for staying informed about the latest developments in the world of biology. 2. The National High School Journal of Science. The National High School Journal of Science (NHSJS) provides a wealth of articles that delve into cutting-edge biological research topics.
Type of research: Including but not limited to research papers, review articles, and humanity/social science pieces. Curieux Academic Journal is a non-profit run by students and was founded in 2017 to publish outstanding research by high school and middle school students. Curieux publishes one issue per month (twelve per year), so there are ...
The F.B.I. said the teenager denied making threats. His father told investigators that he had hunting guns in the house, but said that his son did not have unsupervised access to them.
The school shooting at Apalachee High School was the 23rd time this year a school shooting has resulted in injuries or deaths, according to data compiled by Education Week, a news organization ...
Methods. A single author (MP) searched PubMed and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed articles published at any time in English. Search terms included academic, school, university, stress, mental health, depression, anxiety, youth, young people, resilience, stress management, stress education, substance use, sleep, drop-out, physical health with a combination of any and/or all of the preceding terms.
Young people are writing online prolifically. Seventy-three percent of teens use multiple social media daily, accessing two or more platforms (Rideout and Robb 2018). In fact, 45% of teenagers are connected to the internet almost constantly, with another 44% logging on a few times each day (Anderson and Jiang 2018).
Authorities searching the home of the 14-year-old accused of killing four people at a Georgia high school this week found documents that they believe he wrote referencing past school shootings, a ...
Here is how The New York Times tallies this type of shooting. By Adeel Hassan The shooting at a high school in Winder, Ga., in which a gunman killed two teachers and two students, and wounded nine ...
Because high schools are typically larger and have students drawn from a wider catchment area, these students have an opportunity to redefine themselves in high school by making new friends and joining many new clubs and activities. For them, they have been able to negotiate the early adolescent years with little lasting negative outcomes.
The following 23 review activities aim to help educators enhance subject retention and create an engaging learning environment. 1.Jeopardy: Create a classroom version of this popular game show, using questions related to the lesson or subject. 2.Flashcards: Have students create flashcards with key terms, concepts or questions, and then partner ...
Review article. First published online September 2, 2024. Shoulder Injury Incidence and Epidemiology in Youth, High School, and Collegiate Fastpitch Softball Players: A Systematic Review and Future Research Perspectives ... Oliver GD, Saper MG, Drogosz M, et al. Epidemiology of shoulder and elbow injuries among US high school softball players ...
In a recent paper titled "Image(s)," economists Hans-Joachim Voth and David Yanagizawa-Drott analyzed 14.5 million high school yearbook photos from all over the U.S. Their AI tool categorized each ...
Between the Columbine High shooting in 1999 and the one at Apalachee 25 years later, children have committed at least 195 school shootings, according to a Post database that tracks gun violence on ...
The 14-year-old Apalachee High School student charged in connection with a shooting that left two students and two teachers dead did not enter a plea during his first appearance in court Friday.